Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastric ultrasound contrast agent for demonstrating small gastric subepithelial masses

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the role of transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastric contrast agent (TUS-OCCA) for detection and characterization of small gastric subepithelial masses (≤3 cm) by comparison with endosonography (EUS).

Methods

Ninety-five patients with small gastric subepithelial masses detected by gastroscopy examination were enrolled. For each patient, TUS-OCCA was performed prior to EUS by a skilled examiner. TUS-OCCA diagnoses were compared with those of EUS.

Results

TUS-OCCA had a detection rate of 94% (89 of 95) in visualizing small gastric subepithelial masses previously detected by gastroscopy. The sizes of 6 undetected masses ranged from 7 to 12 mm (4 located at the fundus, 2 at the cardia). All of six patients whose lesions were undetected by TUS-OCCA were obese. The findings of gastric subepithelial masses demonstrated by TUS-OCCA were similar to that shown on EUS.

Conclusions

TUS-OCCA can provide useful information about small gastric subepithelial masses, especially for the patients who are not obese. It can be used to follow gastric submucosal tumors that are not excised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Gastroenterological Association Institute (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute medical position statement on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2215–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim MY, Jung HY, Choi KD, et al. (2011) Natural history of asymptomatic small gastric subepithelial tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 45(4):330–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zheng Z, Yu Y, Lu M, et al. (2011) Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison to endoscopic ultrasonography with respect to histopathology. Am J Surg 202(5):605–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xue N, Huang P, Aronow WS, et al. (2011) Predicting lymph node status in patients with early gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Arch Med Sci 7(3):457–464

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang P, Li S, Aronow WS, et al. (2011) Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography evaluation of preoperative Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma. Arch Med Sci 7(2):287–293

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi H, Yu XH, Guo XZ, et al. (2012) Double contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography for evaluation of gastric lesions. World J Gastroenterol 18(31):4136–4144

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li S, Huang P, Wang Z, et al. (2012) Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 33(7):E218–E224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Z, Guo J, Ren W, et al. (2013) A gastric calcifying fibrous pseudotumor detected by transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastrointestinal ultrasound contrast agent. Ultraschall Med 34:1–3. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1350396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park SH, Kim GH, Park do Y, et al. (2011) Endosonographic findings of gastric ectopic pancreas: a single center experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(9):1441–1446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo J, Liu Z, Sun S, et al. (2013) Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound 2(3):125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goto O, Kambe H, Niimi K, et al. (2012) Discrepancy in diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumor among esophagogastroduodenoscopy, CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography: a retrospective analysis of 93 consecutive cases. Abdom Imaging 37(6):1074–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okten RS, Kacar S, Kucukay F, et al. (2012) Gastric subepithelial masses: evaluation of multidetector CT (multiplanar reconstruction and virtual gastroscopy) versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 37(4):519–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kongkam P, Devereaux BM, Ponnudurai R, et al. (2013) Endoscopic ultrasound forum summary from the Asian Pacific Digestive Week 2012. Endosc Ultrasound 2:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giovannini M (2012) Report of EUS presentations during the 20th UEGW Meeting in Amsterdam. Endosc Ultrasound 1:169–172

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maconi G, Bianchi Porro G (2006) Ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract: examination procedures and new technical developments. Berlin: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  16. Polkowski M, Palucki J, Butruk E (2002) Transabdominal ultrasound for visualizing gastric submucosal tumors diagnosed by endosonography: can surveillance be simplified? Endoscopy 34:979–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Futagami K, Hata J, Haruma K, et al. (2001) Extracorporeal ultrasound is an effective diagnostic alternative to endoscopic ultrasound for gastric submucosal tumours. Scand J Gastroenterol 36:1222–1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maconi G, Radice E, Bareggi E, et al. (2009) Hydrosonography of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Roentgenol 193(3):700–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lund PJ, Fritz TA, Unger EC, et al. (1992) Cellulose as a gastrointestinal US contrast agent. Radiology 185:783–788

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leung WK, Wu MS, Kakugawa Y, et al. (2008) Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. Lancet Oncol 9(3):279–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakajima S (2012) Gastric cancer screening in Japan, now and tomorrow. Nihon Rinsho 70(10):1686–1693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee KS, Oh DK, Han MA, et al. (2011) Gastric cancer screening in Korea: report on the national cancer screening program in 2008. Cancer Res Treat 43(2):83–88

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeong ID, Jung SW, Bang SJ, et al. (2011) Endoscopic enucleation for gastric subepithelial tumors originating in the muscularis propria layer. Surg Endosc 25(2):468–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Ren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Guo, J., Sun, S. et al. Evaluation of transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastric ultrasound contrast agent for demonstrating small gastric subepithelial masses. Abdom Imaging 39, 424–431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0059-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0059-8

Keywords

Navigation