Abstract
With the advent of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), a whole new spectrum of diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures appears. Virtual hysterosalpingography (VHSG) is a novel non-invasive modality for assessing the uterus and female reproductive system that combines hysterosalpingography technique with MDCT technologies. Nowadays, 64-row VHSG offers an excellent diagnostic performance, in concordance with the development of new reproductive interventions and the need of accurate diagnostic procedures. In this article, we review the VHSG technique and describe normal and pathologic findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krysiewicz S (1992) Infertility in women: diagnostic evaluation with hysterosalpingography and other imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:253–261
Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, et al. (2000) Multislice CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. RadioGraphics 20:1787–1806
Boiselle PM, Reynolds KF, Ernst A (2002) Multiplanar and three-dimensional imaging of the central airways with multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:301–308
Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Baronio M, et al. (2009) 64-Row multidetector CT virtual hysterosalpingography. Abdom Imaging 34(1):121–133
Carrascosa P, Baronio M, Capuñay C, et al. (2008) Multidetector computed tomography virtual hysterosalpingography in the investigation of the uterus and fallopian tubes. Eur J Radiol 67(3):531–535
Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Mariano B, et al. (2008) Virtual hysteroscopy by multidetector computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 33(4):381–387
Carrascosa P, Baronio M, Capuñay C, et al. (2008) Clinical use of 64-row multislice computed tomography hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of female factor infertility. Fertil Steril 90(5):1953–1958
Troiano RN, McCarthy SM (2004) Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233(1):19–34
Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, et al. (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12(10):2277–2281
Braun P, Grau VF, Pons RM, et al. (2005) Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformation correctly? A retrospective study. Eur J Radiol 53:274–279
Akaeda T, Isaka K, Nakaji T, et al. (2005) Clinical application of virtual hysteroscopy by CO(2)-multidetector-row computed tomography to submucosal myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:261–266
Hysterosalpingography. http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?PG=hysterosalp
Silberzweig JE, Khorsandi AS, Caldon M, et al. (2008) Gadolinium for hysterosalpingography. J Reprod Med 53(1):15–19
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank Dr. Graciela Fernandez Alonso for her assistance in editing this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carrascosa, P., Capuñay, C., Vallejos, J. et al. Virtual hysterosalpingography: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients. Abdom Imaging 36, 1–14 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9616-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9616-6