Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of water enema computed tomography: an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of colon cancer

Colon cancer: computed tomography using a water enema

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of water enema computed tomography (WECT) for the diagnosis of colon cancer.

Methods

A total of 191 patients referred for clinically suspected colon cancer were prospectively evaluated by WECT in a multicenter trial. Examination was contrast enhanced helical CT after colon filling through a rectal tube. For all the cases, final diagnosis was obtained by colonoscopy and/or surgery. CT data were interpreted both locally and at a centralized site by a specialized and general radiologist.

Results

Seventy-one patients were diagnosed with colon cancer. Overall, WECT sensitivity and specificity were 98.6 and 95.0%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 92.1 and 99.1%, respectively. In a subgroup of 33 patients with unclean bowel, the sensitivity and specificity of WECT were 95.0 and 92.3%, respectively. The correlation between local radiologists and the specialized radiologist was excellent (Kappa = 0.87) as was the correlation between the general radiologist and the specialist (Kappa = 0.92).

Conclusion

This prospective analysis demonstrates that WECT is an effective, safe, and simple imaging technique for the diagnosis of colon cancer and can be proposed when a strong clinical suspicion of colon cancer is present, especially in frail patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahsan H, Neugut AI, Garbowski GC et al. (1998) Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps and increased risk for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 128:900–905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith RA, Cokkinidies V, Eyre HJ (2003) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 53(1):27–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Conférence de Consensus (1998) Prévention, dépistage et prise encharge des cancers du colon. Haute Autorité de Santé. www.HAS.org

  4. Hugh TJ, Kinsella AR, Poston GJ (1997) Management strategies for colorectal metastases. Surg Oncol 6(1):19–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poston GJ (2004) Surgical strategies for colorectal liver metastases. Surg Endosc 13:125–136

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh JM, Terdiman JP (2003) Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA 289(10):1288–1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS et al. (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227(2):378–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aufort S, Charra L, Lesnik A, Bruel JM, Taourel P (2005) Multidetector CT of bowel obstruction: value of post-processing. Eur Radiol 15(11):2323–2329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23): 2191–2200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14):1713–1719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. The Lancet 365(9456):305–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Angelli G, Macarini L, Lupo L et al. (1990) Rectal carcinoma: CT staging with water as contrast medium. Radiology 177:511–514

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gossios KJ, Tsianos EV, Kontogiannis DS et al. (1992) Water as contrast medium for computed tomography study of colonic wall lesions. Gastrointest Radiol. 17:125–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gazelle GS, Gaa J, Saini S, Shellito P (1995) Staging of colon carcinoma using water enema CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:87–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caseiro-Alves F, Gonçalo M, Cruz L et al. (1998) Water enema computed tomography (WE-CT) in the local staging of low colorectal neoplasms: comparison with transrectal ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 23:370–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M (1999) Evaluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma. Eur Radiol 9:78–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pilleul F, Bansac-Lamblin A, Monneuse O et al. (2006) Water enema computed tomography: diagnostic tool in suspicion of colorectal tumor. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30(2):231–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ridereau-Zins C, Aubé C, Leblay F et al. (2003) Feasibility and initial results of water enema computed tomography (WE-CT). Eur Radiol 13(1):CO193 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bruel JM, Gallix B, Achard C, Pierredon MA, Molina E (2003) Multidetector CT and MRI in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. J Radiol 84:499–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kealey SM, Dodd JD, Mac Eneaney PM, Gibney RG, Malone DE (2004) Minimal preparation computed tomography instead of barium enema/colonoscopy for suspected colon cancer in frail elderly patients: an outcome analysis study. Clin Radiol 59(1):44–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng CS, Doyle TC, Pinto EM, et al. (2002) Caecal carcinomas in the elderly: useful signs in minimal preparation CT. Clin Radiol 57(5):359–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Anthony Bailleul from the clinical research centre of the University Hospital of Angers for the data collection.

Conflict of interest

Regarding our work, no conflict of interest between the author and co-authors has arisen in the past or is presently existent. No financial arrangement has biased our work and no outside interests have influenced our results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Aubé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridereau-Zins, C., Aubé, C., Luet, D. et al. Assessment of water enema computed tomography: an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of colon cancer. Abdom Imaging 35, 407–413 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9536-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9536-5

Keywords

Navigation