Skip to main content
Log in

Vascular involvement in periampullary tumors: MDCT, EUS, and CDU

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In patients affected by periampullary tumors, surgical resection represents the only treatment with curative intent. Preoperative evaluation of vascular involvement is necessary to avoid surgical treatments unable of curative intent resection. The aim of our update article is to assess the performance of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in the evaluation of vascular involvement of major peripancreatic vessels, in periampullary tumors, analyzing the current and past literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sahani D, Kadavigere R, Saokar A, et al. (2005) Cystic pancreatic lesions: a simple imaging-based classification system for guiding management. Radiographics 25:1471–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brugge WR (2004) Evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions with EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 59:698–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammel P, Levy P, Voitot H, et al. (1995) Preoperative cyst fluid analysis is useful for the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastroenterology 108:1230–1235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schima W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Kölblinger C, et al. (2007) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 17:638–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. House MG, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. (2004) Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography. J Gastrointest Surg 8(3):280–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramage JK, Davies A, Ardill J, et al. on behalf of UKNETwork for neuroendocrine tumors (2005) Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gut 54:iv1–iv16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Perzin KH, Bridge MF (1981) Adenomas of the small intestine: a clinicopathologic review of 51 cases and study of their relationship to carcinoma. Cancer 48:799–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Treitschke F, Beger HG (1999) Local resection of benign periampullary tumors. Ann Oncol 10(Suppl 4):212–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noda Y, Watanabe H, Iida M, et al. (1992) Histologic follow-up of ampullary adenomas in patients with familial adenomatosis . Cancer 70:1847–1856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seifer E, Schulte F, Stolte M (1992) Adenoma and carcinoma of the duodenum and papilla of Vater: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Gastroenterol 87:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, et al. (1999) Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med 341:1368–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazaridis K, Gores G (2005) Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 128:1655–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Satoi S, Yamamoto H, Takay S, et al. (2007) Clinical impact of multidetector row computed tomography on patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 34(2):175–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fishman EK (2001) Imaging pancreatic cancer: the role of multidetetor CT with three-dimensional CT angiography. Pancreatology 1:610–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA, et al. (2003) Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row C. Radiology 229:81–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson SW, Zajick D, Lucey BC, et al. (2007) 64-detector row computed tomography: an improved tool for evaluating the biliary and pancreatic ducts? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36(6):258–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aschoff AJ, Görich J, Sokiranski R, et al. (1999) Pancreas: does hyoscyamine butylbromide increase the diagnostic value of helical CT? Radiology 210(3):861–864

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schueller G, Schima W, Schueller-Weidekamm C, et al. (2006) Multidetector CT of pancreas: effects of contrast material flow rate and individualized scan delay on enhancement of pancreas and tumor contrast. Radiology 241(2):441–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fenchel S, Fleiter TR, Aschoff AJ, et al. (2001) Effect of iodine concentration on contrast enhancement in multislice helical CT of the abdomen. Radiology 221:119

    Google Scholar 

  20. Diehl SJ, Lehmann KJ, Sadlick M, et al. (1998) Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability. Radiology 206:373–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Horton KM, Hruban RH, Yeo C, et al. (2006) Multi-detector row CT of pancreatic islet cell tumors. Radiographics 26:453–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Imbriaco M, Smeraldo D, Liuzzi R, et al. (2006) Multislice CT with single-phase technique in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. Radiol Med (Torino) 111(2):159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gusmini S, Nicoletti R, Martinenghi C, et al. (2007) Arterial vs pancreatic phase: which is the best choice in the evaluation of pancreatic endocrine tumours with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)? Radiol Med (Torino) 112(7):999–1012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Sou H, et al. (2006) MDCT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: optimal imaging phases and multiplanar reformatted imaging. Am J Roentgenol 187(6):1513–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahani DV, Kadavigere R, Blake M, et al. (2006) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas: multi-detector row CT with 2D curved reformations—correlation with MRCP. Radiology 238(2):560–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson SW, Zajick D, Lucey BC, et al. (2007) 64-detector row computed tomography: an improved tool for evaluating the biliary and pancreatic ducts? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36(6):258–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, et al. (2004) MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. Am J Roentgenol 182(2):419–425

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barthet M (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound teaching and learning. Minerva Med 98(4):247–251. Review

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen CH, Tseng LJ, Yang CC, et al. (2001) Preoperative evaluation of periampullary tumors by endoscopic sonography, transabdominal sonography, and computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 29(6):313–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bao PQ, Johnson JC, Lindsey EH, et al. (2008) Endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography predictors of pancreatic cancer resectability. J Gastrointest Surg 12(1):10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S, Desai S, et al. (2007) A prospective evaluation of an algorithm incorporating routine preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in suspected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11(7):813–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bahra M, Jacob D (2008) Surgical palliation of advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 177:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yusuf TE, Harewood GC, Clain JE, et al. (2004) Knowledge of indications for EUS among gastroenterologists and non-gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 60(4):575–579. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 61(2):356

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kern A, Dobrowolski F, Kersting S, et al. (2008) Color Doppler imaging predicts portal invasion by pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15(4):1137–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Alempijević T, Kovacević N, Tomić D, et al. (2006) Significance of color Doppler ultrasonography in the assessment of pancreatic carcinoma vascular invasion. Vojnosanit Pregl 63(10):857–860. Serbian

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Angeli E, Vanzulli A, Castrucci M, et al. (1997) Value of abdominal sonography and MR Imaging at 0.5T in preoperative detection of pancreatic insulinoma: a comparison with dynamic CT and angiography. Abdom Imaging 22:295–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Miura F, Takada T, Amano H, et al. (2006) Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 8(5):337–342

    Google Scholar 

  38. Arcidiacono PG, Carrara S (2004) Endoscopic ultrasonography: impact in diagnosis, staging and management of pancreatic tumors. J Pancreatol 5:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gandolfi L, Torresan F, Solmi L, et al. (2003) The role of ultrasound in biliary and pancreatic diseases. Eur J Ultrasound 16(3):141–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. (1997) Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 168(6):1439–1443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Raptopoulos V, Steer ML, Sheiman RG, et al. (1997) The use of helical CT and CT angiography to predict vascular involvement from pancreatic cancer: correlation with findings at surgery. Am J Roentgenol 168(4):971–977

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Li H, Zeng MS, Zhou KR, et al. (2006) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: signs of vascular invasion determined by multi-detector row CT. Br J Radiol 79(947):880–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Li H, Zeng MS, Zhou KR, et al. (2005) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the different CT criteria for peripancreatic major arterial and venous invasion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29(2):170–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lepanto L, Arzoumanian Y, Gianfelice D, et al. (2002) Helical CT with CT angiography in assessing periampullary neoplasms: identification of vascular invasion. Radiology 222(2):347–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Manak E, Merkel S, Klein P, et al. (2007) Resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment using multidetector-row computed tomography with multiplanar reformations. Abdom Imaging (Epub ahead of print)

  46. DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, et al. (2004) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 141(10):753–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hunt GC, Faigel DO (2002) Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 55(2):232–237. Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dewitt J, Devereaux BM, Lehman GA, et al. (2006) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(6):717–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Angeli E, Venturini M, Vanzulli A, et al. (1997) Color Doppler imaging in the assessment of vascular involvement by pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 168(1):193–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fusai G, Warnaar N, Sabin CA, et al. (2008) Outcome of R1 resection in patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Corrado Soldati, MD, for his valuable assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Gusmini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gusmini, S., Nicoletti, R., Martinenghi, C. et al. Vascular involvement in periampullary tumors: MDCT, EUS, and CDU. Abdom Imaging 34, 514–522 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9439-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9439-x

Keywords

Navigation