Skip to main content
Log in

Ulcerative colitis: value of MR imaging

  • INVITED UPDATE
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent technologic advances have greatly improved the quality of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by allowing the identification of abnormalities in inflammatory bowel disease. Thus far, the role of MRI has been extensively investigated in Crohn disease (CD) and, to a minor extent, in ulcerative colitis (UC), likely due to intrinsic differences between these two diseases. In UC the inflammatory lesions, unlike CD, are confined to the colon, have a predictable spreading, and affect only the inner wall layer; thus endoscopy alone can assess the extent and severity of disease in most cases. However, preliminary studies have demonstrated that MRI also can be a reliable diagnostic tool for UC because it is useful for integrating clinical and endoscopic data. MRI can be valuable in distinguishing CD from UC in uncertain cases by assessing the sparing of the distal ileum and the continuity of colonic involvement. Moreover, MRI can provide important information if endoscopy is incomplete, e.g., due to tight strictures, or contraindicated, e.g., in severely acute disease, due to a high risk of perforation. MRI can detect most of the typical findings of the diseases, such as wall thickening, mural stratification, loss of haustrations, and several complications including fibrotic or neoplastic strictures. In addition, MRI can be extremely valuable in assessing disease activity by monitoring the degree of wall gadolinium enhancement and T2 signal at the level of the affected bowel segments, thus influencing pharmacologic and surgical planning. In the next few years, MRI will likely become the imaging modality of choice in the clinical management of this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DP Jewell (1993) Ulcerative colitis MH Sleisenger JS Foerdtran (Eds) Gastrointestinal disease EditionNumber4 Saunders Philadelphia 1305–1330

    Google Scholar 

  2. RH Riddell (2000) Patology of idiopatic inflammatory bowel disease JB Kirsner (Eds) Inflammatory bowel disease EditionNumber5th WB Saunders Philadelphia 427–447

    Google Scholar 

  3. BH Lasner (2000) Clinical features, course, laboratory findings, and complications in ulcerative colitis JB Kirsner (Eds) Inflammatory bowel disease EditionNumber5th WB Saunders Philadelphia 305–314

    Google Scholar 

  4. JF Debatin MA Patak (1999) ArticleTitleMRI of the small and large bowel Eur Radiol 9 1523–1534 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300050878 Occurrence Handle10525859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DJ Lomas (1999) ArticleTitleThe potential of MR for small bowel imaging Imaging 11 161–169

    Google Scholar 

  6. F Maccioni (2002) ArticleTitleCurrent status of gastrointestinal MRI Abdom Imaging 27 384–393 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00261-001-0119-3 Occurrence Handle12066236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JP Shoenut RC Semelka R Silverman et al. (1993) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging in inflammatory bowel disease J Clin Gastroenterol 17 73–78 Occurrence Handle8409303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. U Kettritz K Isaaks DM Warshauer et al. (1995) ArticleTitleCrohn disease. Pilot study comparing MRI of the abdomen with clinical evaluation J Clin Gastroenterol 21 249–253 Occurrence Handle8648064

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O Ernst T Asselah X Cablan et al. (1998) ArticleTitleBreath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging of Crohn’s disease AJR 170 127–128 Occurrence Handle9423615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SM Madsen HS Thomsen P Munkholm et al. (1998) ArticleTitleActive Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis evaluated by low-field magnetic resonance imaging Scand J Gastroenterol 33 1193– 1200 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00365529850172566 Occurrence Handle9867099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. F Maccioni A Viscido L Broglia et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEvaluation of Crohn disease activity with MRI Abdom Imaging 25 219–228 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002610000004 Occurrence Handle10823437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. A Rieber A Aschoff K Nussle et al. (2000) ArticleTitleMRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis Eur Radiol 10 1377–1382 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300000354 Occurrence Handle10997423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. N Gourtsoyiannis N Papanikolaou J Grammatikakis et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences Eur Radiol 11 908–913 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300000805 Occurrence Handle11419161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DM Koh Y Miao RI Chinn et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease AJR 177 1325–1332 Occurrence Handle11717076

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. F Maccioni A Viscido M Marini et al. (2002) ArticleTitleMRI evaluation of Crohn’s disease of the small and large bowel with the use of negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agents Abdom Imaging 27 384–393 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00261-001-0119-3 Occurrence Handle12066236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. RN Low CP Sebrechts DA Politoske et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCrohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single shot fast spin echo and gadolinium enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging Radiology 222 652–660 Occurrence Handle11867781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. A Giovagnoni M Misericordia F Terilli et al. (1993) ArticleTitleMR imaging of ulcerative colitis Abdom Imaging 18 371–375 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00201786 Occurrence Handle8220041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. F Maccioni 2004 MRI of colitis A Chapman Radiology and imaging of the colon Springer-Verlag, New York 20 201 214

  19. A Giovagnoni A Fabbri F Maccioni (2002) ArticleTitleOral contrast agent in MRI of the gastrointestinal tract Abdom Imaging 27 367–375 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00261-001-0117-5 Occurrence Handle12066234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A Laghi C Catalano R Iannaccone et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePolyethylene glycol solution as an oral contrast agent for MR Imaging of the small bowel AJR 177 1333–1334 Occurrence Handle11717077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JK Lee RC Semelka (1998) ArticleTitleMR imaging of the small bowel using the HASTE sequence AJR 170 1457–1463 Occurrence Handle9609153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. F Maccioni 2004 MRI of colitis A Chapman Radiology and imaging of the colon Springer-Verlag, New York 20 201 214

  23. LE Philpotts JP Heiken MA Westcott et al. (1994) ArticleTitleColitis: use of CT findings in differential diagnosis Radiology 190 445–449 Occurrence Handle8284397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. RM Gore (1994) Cross sectional imaging of the colon RM Gore MS Levine I Laufer (Eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology WB Saunders Philadelphia 1052–1063

    Google Scholar 

  25. RM Gore EJ Balthazar GG Ghahremani FH Miller (1996) ArticleTitleCT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease AJR 167 3–15 Occurrence Handle8659415

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gore RM, Ghahremani GG, Miller FH. Inflammatory bowel disease: radiologic diagnosis. In: Balfe DM, Levie MS, eds. Syllabus of Radiological Society of North America categorical course in gastrointestinal radiology produced by RSNA publications. RSNA 1997:95–110

  27. VHM Klein B Wein G Adam et al. (1995) ArticleTitleComputed tomography of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis Fortschr Roentgenstr 163 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  28. SM Muldowney DM Balfe A Hammerman et al. (1995) ArticleTitle“Acute” fat deposition in bowel wall submucosa: CT appearance J Comput Assist Tomogr 19 390–393 Occurrence Handle7790548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. B Jones EK Fishman SR Hamilton et al. (1986) ArticleTitleSubmucosal accumulation of fat in inflammatory bowel disease: CT/pathologic correlation J Comput Assist Tomogr 10 759–763 Occurrence Handle3745545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maccioni F, Colaiacomo MC, Bruni A, et al. Role of MR Imaging in the clinical management of patients with Ulcerative colitis [abstract]. Presented at the Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the RSNA; 2003

  31. SC Truelove AS Pena (1976) ArticleTitleCourse and prognosis of Crohn’s disease Gut 17 192–198 Occurrence Handle1269986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. E Kangas M Matikainen J Mattila (1994) ArticleTitleIs “indeterminate colitis” Crohn’s disease in the long-term follow-up? Int Surg 79 120–125 Occurrence Handle7928146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. AB Price (1978) ArticleTitleOverlap in the spectrum of non-specific inflammatory bowel disease “colitis indeterminate.” J Clin Pathol 31 567–574 Occurrence Handle670413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. M Rioux J Gagnon (1997) ArticleTitleImaging modalities in the puzzling world of inflammatory bowel disease Abdom Imaging 22 173–174 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002619900165 Occurrence Handle9013528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Maccioni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maccioni, F., Colaiacomo, M.C. & Parlanti, S. Ulcerative colitis: value of MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 30, 584–592 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0284-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0284-2

Keywords

Navigation