Abstract
Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous tumors (IPMTs) are increasingly being described and represent a challenge for the physician. Recent imaging modalities, especially computed tomography and magnetic resonance, allow for a correct diagnosis, but IPMTs can manifest with different degrees of cellular atypia so it is very important to be able to establish the biological behavior of the lesion. Sixty-five patients were included in this study: 29 of them underwent surgery, and the other 36 were followed with cross-sectional imaging. Among patients who underwent surgery, 11 had benign lesions and 18 had malignant lesions. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the diagnosis of malignancy for all the cross-sectional imaging techniques were 61%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Among patients who were followed and had a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic diagnosis of branch duct IPMT with imaging features indicative of benignity, only two showed modifications over the follow-up period. Even considering some important biases (small number of patients and relatively short follow-up), interesting conclusions can be drawn: the imaging diagnosis of malignancy can be trusted, whereas that of benignity cannot be relied upon, but if the signs of malignancy are absent, the slow growth of the lesions justifies watchful follow-up in the correct clinical setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ohhashi K, Murakami Y, et al. (1982) Four cases of mucous producing pancreatic cancer on specific findings of the papilla of Vater. Prog Dig Endosc 20:348–351
Itai Y, Ohhashi K, Nagai H et al. (1986) “Ductectatic” mucinous cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Radiology 161:697–700
Taouli B, Vilgrain V, O’Toole D, et al. (2002) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: features with multimodality imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26: 223–231
Solcia E, Capella C, Klöppel G, et al. Tumors of the exocrine pancreas. In: Solcia E, Capella C, Klöppel G, eds. Tumors of the pancreas, volume 20. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1997:53–64
Procacci C, Megibow AJ, Carbognin G, et al. (1999) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 19:1447–1463
Procacci C, Carbognin G, Biasiutti C, et al. (2001) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: spectrum of CT and MR findings with pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 11:1939–1951
Lichtenstein DR, Carr-Locke DL (1995) Mucin-secreting tumors of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 5:237–258
Loftus EV Jr, Olivares-Pakzad BA, et al. (1996) Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: clinicopathologic features, outcome, and nomenclature. Members of the Pancreas Clinic and Pancreatic Surgeons of Mayo Clinic. Gastroenterology 110:1909–1918
Madura JA, Wiebke EA, Howard TJ, et al. (1997) Mucin-hypersecreting intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas: a precursor to cystic pancreatic malignancies. Surgery 122:786–793
Nakagohri T, Kenmochi T, Kainuma O, et al. (1999) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Am J Surg 178:344–347
Navarro F, Michel J, Bauret P, et al. (1999) Management of intraductal papillary mucinous tumours of the pancreas. Eur J Surg 165:43–48
Traverso LW (2002) Surgical treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: the aggressive approach. J Gastrointest Surg 6:662–663
Terris B, Ponsot P, Paye F, et al. (2000) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas confined to secondary ducts show less aggressive pathologic features as compared with those involving the main pancreatic duct. Am J Surg Pathol 24:1372–1377
Yamao K, Ohashi K, Nakamura T, et al. (2000) The prognosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 47:1129–1134
Megibow AJ, Lombardo FP, Guarise A, et al. (2001) Cystic pancreatic masses: cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up. Abdom Imaging 26:640–647
Fernandez-del Castillo C (2002) Surgical treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: the conservative approach. J Gastrointest Surg 6:660–661
Matsumoto T, Aramaki M, Yada K, et al. (2003) Optimal management of the branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 36:261–265
Procacci C, Carbognin G, Accordini S, et al. (2001) CT features of malignant mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas. Eur Radiol 11:1626–1630
Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Shimizu S, et al. (1999) Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the pancreas: a clinical review of 13 benign and four malignant tumours. Eur J Surg 165:223–229
Fukukura Y, Fujiyoshi F, Sasaki M, et al. (2000) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: thin-section helical CT findings. AJR 174:441–447
Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Vullierme MP, et al. (2000) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: helical CT with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 217:757–764
Yamaguchi K, Sugitani A, Chijiiwa K, et al. (2001) Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas: assessing the grade of malignancy from natural history. Am Surg 67:400–406
Procacci C, Carbognin G, Biasiutti C, et al. (2001) Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: imaging findings. Radiol Med 102:23–31
Irie H, Yoshimitsu K, Aibe H, et al. (2004) Natural history of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of branch duct type. Follow-up study by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:117–122
Handrich SJ, Hough DM, Fletcher JG, et al. (2005) The natural history of the incidentally discovered small simple pancreatic cyst: long-term follow-up and clinical implications. AJR 184:20–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9700-6
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carbognin, G., Zamboni, G., Pinali, L. et al. Branch duct IPMTs: value of cross-sectional imaging in the assessment of biological behavior and follow-up. Abdom Imaging 31, 320–325 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0127-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0127-1