Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

All-in-one interictal presurgical imaging in patients with epilepsy: single-session EEG/PET/(f)MRI

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy, resection of the epileptic focus can lead to freedom from seizures or significant improvement in well-selected candidates. Localization of the epileptic focus with multimodal concordance is crucial for a good postoperative outcome. Beyond the detection of epileptogenic lesions on structural MRI and focal hypometabolism on FDG PET, EEG-based Electric Source Imaging (ESI) and simultaneous EEG and functional MRI (EEG-fMRI) are increasingly applied for mapping epileptic activity. We here report presurgical multimodal interictal imaging using a hybrid PET/MR scanner for single-session FDG PET, MRI, EEG-fMRI and ESI.

Methods

This quadrimodal imaging procedure was performed in a single session in 12 patients using a high-density (256 electrodes) MR-compatible EEG system and a hybrid PET/MR scanner. EEG was used to exclude subclinical seizures during uptake of the PET tracer, to compute ESI on interictal epileptiform discharges and to guide fMRI analysis for mapping haemodynamic changes correlated with interictal epileptiform activity.

Results

The whole multimodal recording was performed in less than 2 hours with good patient comfort and data quality. Clinically contributory examinations with at least two modalities were obtained in nine patients and with all modalities in five patients.

Conclusion

This single-session quadrimodal imaging procedure provided reliable and contributory interictal clinical data. This procedure avoids multiple scanning sessions and is associated with less radiation exposure than PET-CT. Moreover, it guarantees the same medication level and medical condition for all modalities. The procedure improves workflow and could reduce the duration and cost of presurgical epilepsy evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spencer S, Huh L. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(6):525–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Von Oertzen J, Urbach H, Jungbluth S, Kurthen M, Reuber M, Fernandez G, et al. Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(6):643–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan JS. Imaging in the surgical treatment of epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6(10):537–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner J, Weber B, Urbach H, Elger CE, Huppertz HJ. Morphometric MRI analysis improves detection of focal cortical dysplasia type II. Brain J Neurol. 2011;134(Pt 10):2844–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chassoux F, Rodrigo S, Semah F, Beuvon F, Landre E, Devaux B, et al. FDG-PET improves surgical outcome in negative MRI Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasias. Neurology. 2010;75(24):2168–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Paesschen W, Dupont P, Sunaert S, Goffin K, Van Laere K. The use of SPECT and PET in routine clinical practice in epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20(2):194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carne RP, O’Brien TJ, Kilpatrick CJ, MacGregor LR, Hicks RJ, Murphy MA, et al. MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome. Brain J Neurol. 2004;127(Pt 10):2276–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kagawa K, Chugani DC, Asano E, Juhasz C, Muzik O, Shah A, et al. Epilepsy surgery outcome in children with tuberous sclerosis complex evaluated with alpha-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan positron emission tomography (PET). J Child Neurol. 2005;20(5):429–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kargiotis O, Lascano AM, Garibotto V, Spinelli L, Genetti M, Wissmeyer M, et al. Localization of the epileptogenic tuber with electric source imaging in patients with tuberous sclerosis. Epilepsy Res. 2014;108(2):267–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar A, Juhasz C, Asano E, Sood S, Muzik O, Chugani HT. Objective detection of epileptic foci by 18F-FDG PET in children undergoing epilepsy surgery. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(12):1901–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pittau F, Grouiller F, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM, Vulliemoz S. The role of functional neuroimaging in pre-surgical epilepsy evaluation. Front Neurol. 2014;5:31.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brodbeck V, Spinelli L, Lascano AM, Wissmeier M, Vargas MI, Vulliemoz S, et al. Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients. Brain J Neurol. 2011;134(Pt 10):2887–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Megevand P, Spinelli L, Genetti M, Brodbeck V, Momjian S, Schaller K, et al. Electric source imaging of interictal activity accurately localises the seizure onset zone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(1):38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grouiller F, Thornton RC, Groening K, Spinelli L, Duncan JS, Schaller K, et al. With or without spikes: localization of focal epileptic activity by simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain J Neurol. 2011;134(Pt 10):2867–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pittau F, Dubeau F, Gotman J. Contribution of EEG-fMRI to the definition of the epileptic focus. Neurology. 2012;78(19):1479–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thornton R, Vulliemoz S, Rodionov R, Carmichael DW, Chaudhary UJ, Diehl B, et al. Epileptic networks in focal cortical dysplasia revealed using electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(5):822–37.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thornton R, Laufs H, Rodionov R, Cannadathu S, Carmichael DW, Vulliemoz S, et al. EEG correlated functional MRI and postoperative outcome in focal epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(8):922–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garibotto V, Heinzer S, Vulliemoz S, Guignard R, Wissmeyer M, Seeck M, et al. Clinical applications of hybrid PET/MRI in neuroimaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38(1):e13–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lemieux L, Allen PJ, Franconi F, Symms MR, Fish DR. Recording of EEG during fMRI experiments: patient safety. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38(6):943–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferree TC, Luu P, Russell GS, Tucker DM. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(3):536–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandelkow H, Halder P, Boesiger P, Brandeis D. Synchronization facilitates removal of MRI artefacts from concurrent EEG recordings and increases usable bandwidth. Neuroimage. 2006;32(3):1120–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulz V, Torres-Espallardo I, Renisch S, Hu Z, Ojha N, Bornert P, et al. Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(1):138–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72(2):184–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brunet D, Murray MM, Michel CM. Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:813870.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Murray MM, Michel CM, Martuzzi R, Gonzalez Andino SL. Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. Neuroimage. 2004;21(2):527–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guggisberg AG, Dalal SS, Zumer JM, Wong DD, Dubovik S, Michel CM, et al. Localization of cortico-peripheral coherence with electroencephalography. Neuroimage. 2011;57(4):1348–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brodbeck V, Lascano AM, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM. Accuracy of EEG source imaging of epileptic spikes in patients with large brain lesions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(4):679–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brodbeck V, Spinelli L, Lascano AM, Pollo C, Schaller K, Vargas MI, et al. Electrical source imaging for presurgical focus localization in epilepsy patients with normal MRI. Epilepsia. 2010;51(4):583–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Michel CM, Lantz G, Spinelli L, De Peralta RG, Landis T, Seeck M. 128-channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: clinical yield and localization precision. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21(2):71–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siniatchkin M, Groening K, Moehring J, Moeller F, Boor R, Brodbeck V, et al. Neuronal networks in children with continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep. Brain J Neurol. 2010;133(9):2798–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lantz G, Spinelli L, Seeck M, de Peralta Menendez RG, Sottas CC, Michel CM. Propagation of interictal epileptiform activity can lead to erroneous source localizations: a 128-channel EEG mapping study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;20(5):311–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Allen PJ, Josephs O, Turner R. A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2000;12(2):230–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Allen PJ, Polizzi G, Krakow K, Fish DR, Lemieux L. Identification of EEG events in the MR scanner: the problem of pulse artifact and a method for its subtraction. Neuroimage. 1998;8(3):229–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995;7(6):1129–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Alkawadri R, So NK, Van Ness PC, Alexopoulos AV. Cingulate epilepsy: report of 3 electroclinical subtypes with surgical outcomes. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(8):995–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Catana C, Drzezga A, Heiss WD, Rosen BR. PET/MRI for neurologic applications. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(12):1916–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Salamon N, Kung J, Shaw SJ, Koo J, Koh S, Wu JY, et al. FDG-PET/MRI coregistration improves detection of cortical dysplasia in patients with epilepsy. Neurology. 2008;71(20):1594–601.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martinez-Moller A, Nekolla SG. Attenuation correction for PET/MR: problems, novel approaches and practical solutions. Z Med Phys. 2012;22(4):299–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bailey DL, Barthel H, Beuthin-Baumann B, Beyer T, Bisdas S, Boellaard R, et al. Combined PET/MR: Where are we now? Summary report of the second international workshop on PET/MR imaging April 8-12, 2013, Tubingen, Germany. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16(3):295–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dickson JC, O’Meara C, Barnes A. A comparison of CT- and MR-based attenuation correction in neurological PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(6):1176–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Genetti M, Grouiller F, Vulliemoz S, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM, et al. Noninvasive language mapping in patients with epilepsy or brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(4):555–65; discussion 65.

  42. Lascano AM, Grouiller F, Genetti M, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Schaller K, et al. Surgically relevant localization of the central sulcus with high-density somatosensory-evoked potentials compared with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(5):517–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jacobs J, Kobayashi E, Boor R, Muhle H, Stephan W, Hawco C, et al. Hemodynamic responses to interictal epileptiform discharges in children with symptomatic epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2007;48(11):2068–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Noth U, Laufs H, Stoermer R, Deichmann R. Simultaneous electroencephalography-functional MRI at 3 T: an analysis of safety risks imposed by performing anatomical reference scans with the EEG equipment in place. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2012;35(3):561–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Luo Q, Glover GH. Influence of dense-array EEG cap on fMRI signal. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(3):807–15.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chu CJ. High density EEG – what do we have to lose? Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;126(3):433–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation for Scientific Research (grant nos. 33CM30-140332 and 320030-141165 and 146633), the Gertrude von Meissner Foundation and by the Centre for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM) of the Universities and Hospitals of Geneva and Lausanne, and the EPFL.

Conflicts of interest

S.H. and B.D. are Philips clinical scientists hired to run the scanner together with the hospital staff. They provided valuable technical assistance and are included in the authors’ list. However, the data analysis and interpretation were performed by the authors with pure academic affiliations with complete independence and without any conflicts of interest with respect to Philips Healthcare. The industrial company had no influence on the writing of this paper. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge Vulliemoz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grouiller, F., Delattre, B.M.A., Pittau, F. et al. All-in-one interictal presurgical imaging in patients with epilepsy: single-session EEG/PET/(f)MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42, 1133–1143 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3045-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3045-2

Keywords

Navigation