Skip to main content
Log in

The regulatory background of nuclear cardiology in Europe: a survey by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology

  • Occasional survey
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nuclear cardiology is a well-validated, non-invasive imaging modality that is highly cost-effective as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. However, the number of procedures in Europe is very far from that which would be expected on the basis of epidemiological data, particularly when comparison is made with the USA. As a preliminary step for future action aimed at improving and increasing nuclear cardiology practice in Europe, the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology performed a survey to identify the regulatory issues and the training components pertaining to the practice of nuclear cardiology.

Methods

a questionnaire was sent to 31 national nuclear medicine societies and to 40 national cardiology societies. The main areas covered by the survey were: (1) the license requirements, (2) the theoretical and practical aspects of training and (3) supervision of the stress test during a nuclear cardiology study.

Results

The results show that, in a setting of wide heterogeneity of national regulations, education and professional practice, nuclear medicine is a restricted and closely regulated specialty. This situation guarantees the quality and safe use of radionuclides; at the same time, however, it limits integration of nuclear medicine into the clinical arena.

Conclusion

Cardiologists should become more involved in nuclear cardiology, to further stimulate the use of this powerful diagnostic and prognostic imaging modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACC/AHA/ASNC. Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging—Executive Summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1318–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, Part 1. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:G5–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: Part 2. J Nucl Cardiology 1999;6:G49–G84

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mowatt G, Vale L, Brazzelli M, Hernandez R, Murray A, Scott N, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. (http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/Scintigraphy_Assessment_Report.pdf)

  5. Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1587–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Union Européene des Medécins Spécialistes, Section of Nuclear Medicine, European Board of Nuclear Medicine, Syllabus for postgraduate specialisation in Nuclear Medicine, 2002 Update (http://www.eanm.org)

  7. Nuclear Cardiology in Europe. National Variation in Education and Legislation (http://www.ecnc-nuclearcardiology.org/index.php)

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Susanna Wiener, PhD, for her invaluable assistance in all phases of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Marcassa.

Additional information

On behalf of the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology

Appendix: survey structure

Appendix: survey structure

  1. 1.

    Is nuclear medicine a specialty by itself?

  2. 2.
    1. a)

      What is the training to become a nuclear medicine specialist?

    2. b)

      Is there specific training for nuclear cardiology?

  3. 3.

    Who is allowed to practice nuclear medicine?

  4. 4.
    1. a)

      Is a licence required to order and/or to inject radiopharmaceuticals?

    2. b)

      Do specialists other than NM specialists have the possibility:

      to obtain a full licence?

      to obtain a restricted licence?

      to engage in restricted practice?

  5. 5.

    Is it possible to acquire the specialty of nuclear medicine as a second specialty?

  6. 6.

    Is a physician required to be present at the performance of a stress test?

  7. 7.

    Are nuclear medicine specialists allowed to perform stress tests on patients?

    If yes, is specific training required?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcassa, C., Bischof Delaloye, A., Cuocolo, A. et al. The regulatory background of nuclear cardiology in Europe: a survey by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 1508–1512 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0211-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0211-6

Keywords

Navigation