Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of wire localisation for non-palpable breast lesions on visualisation of the sentinel node

  • Original article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In our clinic, patients with occult breast lesions are treated with a sentinel node biopsy combined with wire-guided tumour excision. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the influence of the sequence of wire localisation and sentinel node procedure on visualisation of the sentinel node.

Methods

A total of 136 patients had a wire-guided tumour excision combined with a sentinel node procedure. Sixty-six patients had guide wire localisation prior to the sentinel node procedure. Seventy patients had sentinel node visualisation before insertion of the guide wire.

Results

The sentinel node was visualised in 41 (62%) of the patients who first underwent guide wire localisation. In the group of patients who underwent visualisation of the sentinel node before placement of the guide wire, the sentinel node was visualised in 62 (89%). This is a significant difference in visualisation (p<0.001).

Conclusion

This study shows that guide wire localisation prior to the sentinel node procedure negatively influences visualisation of the sentinel node.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kopans DB, DeLuca S. A modified needle-hookwire technique to simplify preoperative localization of occult breast lesions. Radiology 1980;134:781

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 1977;39:456–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandrucci S, Casalegno PS, Percival P, Mistrangelo M, Bombardieri E, Bertoglio S. Sentinel lymph node mapping for breast cancer: a review of the literature relative to 4791 procedures. Tumori 1999;85:425–434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reintgen D, Giuliano A, Cox CE. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: an overview. Breast J 2000;6:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman SM, Krag D, McNally RK, Moor BB, Weaver DL, Klein P. Limitation in gamma probe localization of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients with large excisional biopsy.J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haigh PI, Hansen NM, Qi K, Giuliano AE. Biopsy method and excision volume do not affect success rate of subsequent sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:21–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ege GN, Nold JB, Eng RR, Durakovic A, Conklin JJ. Effects of a metastatic (13762) and nonmetastatic (R3230AC) mammary adenocarcinoma on radiocolloid localisation in regional lymph nodes in Fischer 344 rats. J Reticuloendothel Soc 1983;34:449–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Scoggins CR, Carlson DJ, Laidley AL, El-Eid SE, et al. Factors predicting failure to identify a sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Surgery 2005;138:56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergkvist L, Frisell J. Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:1221–1224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, Van Diest PJ, Boom RP, Meijer S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998;3:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heuser T, Rink T, Weller E, Fitz H, Zippel HH, Kreienberg R, et al. Impact of the axillary nodal status on sentinel node mapping in breast cancer and its relevance for technical proceeding. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001;67:125–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pelosi E, Ala A, Bello M, Douroukas A, Migliaretti G, Berardengo E, et al. Impact of axillary nodal metastases on lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node identification rate in patients with early stage breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:937–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeung HW, Cody III HS, Turlakow A, Riedel ER, Fey J, Gonen M, et al. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer patients: a comparison between 1-day and 2-day protocols. J Nucl Med 2001;42:420–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCarter MD, Yeung H, Yeh S, Fey J, Borgen PI, Cody HS III. Localization of the sentinel node in breast cancer: identical results with same-day and day-before isotope injection. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:682–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chok SH, Chow LW, Wong KH, Cheng KC, Ho WY. Breast sentinel lymph node biopsy using radioisotope injection: is one-day better than two-day protocol? Am Surg 2003;69:358–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergqvist L, Strand SE, Persson BBR. Particle sizing and biokinetics of interstitial lymphoscintigraphic agents. Semin Nucl Med 1983;13:9–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Kroon BBR. Anatomy and physiology of lymphatic drainage of the breast from the perspective of sentinel node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:399–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barros A, Cardoso MA, Sheng PY, Costa PA, Pelizon C. Radioguided localisation of non-palpable breast lesions and simultaneous sentinel lymph node mapping. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:1561–1565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Cicco C, Trifiro G, Intra M, Marotta G, Ciprian A, Frasson A, et al. Optimised nuclear medicine method for tumour marking and sentinel node detection in occult primary breast lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nadeem R, Chagla LS, Harris O, Desmond S, Thind R, Titterrell C, et al. Occult breast lesions: a comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL). Breast 2005;14:283–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Barrowclough for critical reviewing our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. H. de Klerk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jansen, J.E., Bekker, J., de Haas, M.J. et al. The influence of wire localisation for non-palpable breast lesions on visualisation of the sentinel node. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 1296–1300 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0119-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0119-1

Keywords

Navigation