Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

18F-DOPA positron emission tomography for the detection of glomus tumours

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 18F-DOPA whole-body positron emission tomography (18F-DOPA PET) as a biochemical imaging approach for the detection of glomus tumours. 18F-DOPA PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in ten consecutive patients with proven mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase subunit D (SDHD) gene predisposing to the development of glomus tumours and other paragangliomas. 18F-DOPA PET and MRI were performed according to standard protocols. Both methods were assessed under blinded conditions by two experienced specialists in nuclear medicine (PET) and diagnostic radiology (MRI). Afterwards the results were compared. A total of 15 lesions (four solitary and four multifocal tumours, the latter including 11 lesions) were detected by 18F-DOPA PET. Under blinded conditions, 18F-DOPA PET and MRI revealed full agreement in seven patients, partial agreement in two and complete disagreement in one. Eleven of the 15 presumed tumours diagnosed by 18F-DOPA PET were confirmed by MRI. The correlation of 18F-DOPA PET and MRI confirmed three further lesions previously only detected by PET. All of them were smaller than 1 cm and had the signal characteristics of lymph nodes. For one small lesion diagnosed by PET, no morphological MRI correlate could be found even retrospectively. No tumour was detected by MRI that was negative on 18F-DOPA PET. All tumours diagnosed by MRI showed a hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images and a distinct enhancement of contrast medium on T1-weighted images. The mean tumour size was 1.5±0.5 cm. 18F-DOPA PET seems to be a highly sensitive metabolic imaging procedure for the detection of glomus tumours and may have potential as a screening method for glomus tumours in patients with SDHD gene mutations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a, b.
Fig. 2a–c.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Riede UN, Saeger W. Paraganglionäres System. In: Riede UN, Schaefer HW, eds. Allgemeine und spezielle Pathologie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1993:989–991.

  2. Tischler A, Dichter MA. Neuroendocrine neoplasm and their cells of origin. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:919–925.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gruffermann S, Gillman MW, Pasternack LR, Peterson CL, Young WG. Familial carotid body tumors: case report and epidemiologic review. Cancer 1980; 46:2116–2122.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Capella C, Riva C, Cornaggia M, Chiaravalli AM, Frigerio B. Histopathology, cytology and cytochemistry of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas including chemodectomas. Pathol Res Pract 1988; 183:176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parkin JL. Familial multiple glomus tumors and pheochromocytomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90:60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann HPH, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al. Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1459–1466.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Neumann HPH, Berger DP, Sigmund G, Blum U, Schmidt D, Parmer RJ, Volk B, Kirste G. Pheochromocytomas, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, and von Hippel-Lindau disease. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1531–1538.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baysal BE, Ferell RE, Willet-Brozick JE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paragangliomas. Science 2000; 287:848–851.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Held P, Breit A. Comparison of CT and MRI methods in diagnosis of tumors of the para- and retropharyngeal space and temporal bone [in German]. Bildgebung 1994; 61:263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoefnagel CA. Metaiodobenzylguanidine and somatostatin in oncology: role in the management of neural crest tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21:561–581.

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Gils APG, van der Mey AGL, Hoogma RPLM, Falke THM, Moolenar AJ, Pauwels EKJ, van Kroonenburgh MJPG. Iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in patients with chemodectomas of the head and neck region. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:1147–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Gils APG, van Erkel AR, Falke THM, Pauwels EKJ. Magnetic resonance imaging or metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy for the demonstration of paragangliomas? Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21:239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reuland P, Overkamp D, Aicher KP, Bien S, Müller Schauenburg W, Feine U. Catecholamine secreting glomus tumor detected by iodine-123-MIBG scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:463–465.

  14. Weissmann AF, Gonzales CE, Shapiro B, Shulkin B, Francis IR, Leach K. Multiple chemodectomas—carotid body tumor masked by salivary gland uptake on I-123 MIBG scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med 1994; 19:527–531.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kwekkeboom DJ, van Urk H, Pauw BKH, Lamberts SWJ, Kooij PPM, Hoogma RPLM, Krenning EP. Octreotide scintigraphy for the detection of paragangliomas. J Nucl Med 1993; 34:873–878.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schumacher A, Jonas M, Rummeny E, Schmid SH, Scheld HH, Schober O. Rezidivnachweis eines Glomus-Caroticum-Tumors mit der Somatostatin-Rezeptor-Szintigraphie. Nuklearmedizin 1996; 35:38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Carasquillo JA, Chen CC, Li ST, Goldstein DS. [18F]Fluorodopamine positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning for diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. Hypertension 2001; 38:6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoegerle S, Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Koehler G, Waller CF, Scheruebl H, Moser E, Nitzsche E. Whole-body 18F-DOPA PET for detection of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. Radiology 2001; 220:373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoegerle S, Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Brink I, Moser E, Nitzsche E.18F-DOPA positron emission tomography for tumour detection in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and elevated calcitonin levels. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoegerle S, Nitzsche E, Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Manz T, Brink I, Reincke M, Moser E, Neumann HPH. Pheochromocytomas: detection with18F-DOPA whole-body PET—initial results. Radiology 2002; 222:507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gimm O, Armanios M, Dziema H, Neumann HPH, Eng C. Somatic and occult germ-line mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in nonfamilial pheochromocytoma. Cancer Res 2000; 60:6822–6825.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aguiar RCT, Cox G, Pomeroy SL, Dahia PLM. Analysis of the SDHD gene, the susceptibility gene for familial paraganglioma syndrome (PGL1), in pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:2890–2894.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luxen A, Perlmutter M, Bida GT, et al. Remote, semiautomated production of 6-[F-18]fluoro-l-dopa for human studies with PET. J Appl Radiat Isot 1990; 41:275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mix M, Nitzsche EU. PISAC: a post-injection method for segmented attenuation correction in whole-body PET. J Nucl Med 1999; 40 Sl:A297P.

  25. Reinig JW, Doppmann JL, Dwyer AJ, Johnson AR, Knop RH. Adrenal masses differentiated by MR. Radiology 1986; 158:81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dunnick NR. Adrenal imaging: current status. Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:927–936.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mann W, Gilsbach J, Die chirurgische Therapie von großen Glomus jugulare Tumoren. HNO 1984; 32:249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Farrior J. Surgical management of glomus tumors: endocrine-active tumors of the skull base. South Med J 1988; 81:1121–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jackson CG, Harris PF, Glasscock ME, Fritsch M, Dimitrov E, Johnson GD, Poe DS. Diagnosis and management of paraganglioma of the skull base. Am J Surg 1990; 159:389–393.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Albert-Ludwigs University, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany

    Stefan Hoegerle, Ingo Brink & Ernst Moser

  2. Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany

    Nadir Ghanem & Carsten Altehoefer

  3. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany

    Hartmut P. H. Neumann

  4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany

    Joerg Schipper

Authors
  1. Stefan Hoegerle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadir Ghanem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carsten Altehoefer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joerg Schipper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ingo Brink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ernst Moser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hartmut P. H. Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst Moser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoegerle, S., Ghanem, N., Altehoefer, C. et al. 18F-DOPA positron emission tomography for the detection of glomus tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30, 689–694 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1115-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1115-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation