Skip to main content
Log in

Should SPET attenuation correction be more widely employed in routine clinical practice?

  • Controversies
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Dunn RF, Wolff L, Wagner S, Botvinick EH. The inconsistent pattern of thallium defects: a clue to the false positive perfusion scintigram. Am J Cardiol 1981; 48:224–232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, Beller GA, Latour Y, Reeves F. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging (perfusion and ECG-gated SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:69–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. King MA, Tsui BMW, Pan T. Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. Part 1. Impact of attenuation maps and methods of estimating attenuation maps. J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 32:55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ficaro E, Fessler J, Shreve P, Kritzman J, Rose P, Corbett J. Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography: diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected Tc-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1996; 93:463–473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prvulovich EM, Lonn AH, Bomanji JB, Jarritt PH, Ell PJ. Effect of attenuation correction on myocardial thallium-201 distribution in patients with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med 1997; 24:266–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kluge R, Sattler B, Seese A, Knapp WH. Attenuation correction by simultaneous emission-transmission myocardial single- photon emission tomography using technetium-99mlabelled radiotracer: impact on diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Nucl Med 1997; 24:1107–1114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Links JM, Becker LC, Rigo P, Taillefer R, Hanelin L, Anstett F, Burckhardt D, Mixon L. Combined corrections for attenuation, depth-dependent blur, and motion in cardiac SPECT: a multicenter trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2000; 7:414–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ficaro E, Duvernoy C, Karabajakian M, Corbett J. Evaluation of attenuation corrected SPECT perfusion imaging in patients with multi-vessel disease. Circulation 1997; 96:I-308.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duvernoy CS, Ficaro EP, Karabajakian MZ, Rose PA, Corbett JR. Improved detection of left main coronary artery disease with attenuation-corrected SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2000; 7:639–648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsunari I, Boning G, Ziegler SI, Nekolla SG, Stollfus JC, Kosa I, Ficaro EP, Schwaiger M. Attenuation-corrected 99mTctetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography in the detection of viable myocardium: Comparison with positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:927–935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallowitsch HJ, Unterweger O, Mikosch P, Kresnik E, Sykora J, Grimm G, Lind P. Attenuation-correction improves the detection of viable myocardium by thallium-201 cardiac tomography in patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26:459–466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roelants V, Vander Borght T, Walrand S, George J, Bernard X, De Coster P, Vanoverschelde JL, Melin J. Impact of attenuation correction on gated Tc-99m MIBI SPECT for wall thickening analysis in the evaluation of myocardial viability. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:74P.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Train KF, Garcia EV, Maddahi J, Areeda J, Cooke CD, Kiat H, Silagan G, Folks R, Friedman J, Matzer L, Germano G, Bateman T, Ziffer J, DePuey EG, Fink-Bennett D, Cloninger K, Berman DS. Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial tomograms. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:609–618.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Follansbee W, Heller GV, Cullom SJ. A multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 1999; 99:2742–2749.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vidal R, Buvat I, Darcourt J, Megneco O, Designes P, Baudouy M, Bussiere F. Impact of attenuation correction by simultaneous emission/transmission tomography on visual assessment of 201Tl myocardial perfusions images. J Nucl Med 1999; 40:1301–1309.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart R, Ponto R, Dickinson C, Meakem L, Chava R, Juni J. In-vivo validation of simultaneous transmission-emission protocol (STEP) for Tc99m-sestamibi SPECT - quantitative comparison with N-13-ammonia PET. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25:217A.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ficaro EP, Cullom SJ, Graham LS, DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Transmission-emission tomographic systems to be used for attenuation correction. In: DePuey EG, ed. Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. Part 1. J Nucl Cardiol 2001; 8:G51-G58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward P. Ficaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ficaro, E.P. Should SPET attenuation correction be more widely employed in routine clinical practice?. Eur J Nucl Med 29, 409–412 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-001-0759-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-001-0759-0

Navigation