Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of inversion recovery fast spin-echo (FSE) with T2-weighted fat-saturated FSE and T1-weighted MR imaging in bone marrow lesion detection

  • ARTICLE
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To prospectively compare inversion recovery (IR) fast spin-echo (FSE) with T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) and T2-weighted chemical-shift fat-saturated (FS) FSE magnetic resonance sequences in the detection of bone marrow abnormality. Design. Twenty-nine sets of T1-weighted SE [400–640/10–20 (TR/TE)], T2-weighted FS-FSE [2400–3800/91–112/8 (TR/TE/ETL)], and IR-FSE [3700–6000/12–14/170/8 (TR/TE/T1/ETL)] images were acquired with a 1.5-T magnet in 27 patients with bone marrow lesions. The visibility, margination, and extent of 41 lesions, image quality, contrast, and artifacts were qualitatively and quantitatively compared. Results. The lesions were more conspicuous on the IR-FSE than on the T1-weighted SE and T2-weighed FS-FSE images. The extent of lesions was similar for all three sequences. Image quality was better and there were fewer motion artifacts on the T1-weighted images. The mean lesion contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher on the T1-weighted images (p<0.05). Conclusion. The IR-FSE sequence is highly sensitive for detecting bone marrow pathology, with scan time comparable to the T1-weighted SE and T2-weighted FS-FSE sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pui, M., Chang, S. Comparison of inversion recovery fast spin-echo (FSE) with T2-weighted fat-saturated FSE and T1-weighted MR imaging in bone marrow lesion detection. Skeletal Radiol 25, 149–152 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050052

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050052

Navigation