Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlation between Hounsfield unit derived from head, thorax, abdomen, spine and pelvis CT and t-scores from DXA

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 28 September 2021

Abstract

Objectives

CT examination can potentially be utilised for early detection of bone density changes with no additional procedure and radiation dose. We hypothesise that the Hounsfield unit (HU) measured from CT images is correlated to the t-scores derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in multiple anatomic regions.

Materials & methods

Data were obtained retrospectively from all patients who underwent both CT examinations – brain (frontal bone), thorax (T7), abdomen (L3), spine (T7 & L3) or pelvis (left hip) – and DXA between 2014 and 2018 in our centre. To ensure comparability, the period between CT and DXA studies must not exceed one year. Correlations between HU values and t-scores were calculated using Pearson’s correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine threshold HU values for predicting osteoporosis.

Results

The inclusion criteria were met by 1043 CT examinations (136 head, 537 thorax, 159 lumbar and 151 left hip). The left hip consistently provided the most robust correlations (r = 0.664–0.708, p < 0.001) and the best AUC (0.875–0.893). Meanwhile, thorax T7 and lumbar L3 showed average correlations (range of r values is 0.497–0.679, p < 0.001, AUC range = 0.680–0.783, 95% CI 0.561–0.922, all p < 0.02) and moderate AUC (0.680–0.783). Frontal bone shows low correlation and weak AUC with r < 0.5, AUC = 0.538–0.655, all p > 0.05.

Conclusion

HU values derived from the hip, T7 and L3 provided a good to moderate correlation to t-scores with a good prediction for osteoporosis. The suggested optimal thresholds may be used in clinical settings after external validations are performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edwards MH, Dennison EM, Aihie Sayer A, Fielding R, Cooper C. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older age. Bone. 2015;80:126–30.

  2. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. FASIOFIO. "Facts And Statistics | International Osteoporosis Foundation". 2018. Iofbonehealth.Org. https://www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-statistics. 2018. Available from: https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/facts-statistics/epidemiology-of-osteoporosis-and-fragility-fractures.

  4. Mithal A, Bansal B, Kyer CS, Ebeling P. The Asia-Pacific regional audit-epidemiology, costs, and burden of osteoporosis in India 2013: a report of international Osteoporosis Foundation. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(4):449–54. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.137485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Raisz LG. Clinical practice. Screening for osteoporosis. New England J Med. 2005;353(2):164–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp042092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan CY, Subramaniam S, Chin K-Y, Ima-Nirwana S, Muhammad N, Fairus A, et al. Levels of Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices Regarding Osteoporosis and the Associations with Bone Mineral Density among Populations More Than 40 Years Old in Malaysia. Intl J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(21)4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214115.

  7. Chan C, Mohamed N, Ima-Nirwana S, Chin K-Y. A Review of Knowledge, Belief and Practice Regarding Osteoporosis among Adolescents and Young Adults. Intl J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8)1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081727.

  8. Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(8):588–95. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Patrick S, Birur NP, Gurushanth K, Raghavan AS, Gurudath S. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: an in vitro study. Indian J Dental Res: Off Public Indian Soc Dental Res. 2017;28(1):66–70. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_415_16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph JS, Paul AA, Wellington KH. Use of computed tomography for assessing bone mineral density. Neurosurgical Focus FOC. 2014;37(1):E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.5.FOCUS1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Majumdar SR, Leslie WD. Conventional computed tomography imaging and bone mineral density: opportunistic screening or “Incidentaloporosis”? Annals Internal Med. 2013;158(8):630–1. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Batawil N, Sabiq S. Hounsfield unit for the diagnosis of bone mineral density disease: a proof of concept study. Radiography. 2016;22(2):e93–e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Na MK, Won YD, Kim CH, Kim JM, Cheong JH, Ryu JI, et al. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening via the measurement of frontal skull Hounsfield units derived from brain computed tomography images. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197336-e. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bone Mass Measurement. Pub. No. 18–7877-E. 2018. Available from: https://www.bones.nih.gov/sites/bones/files/pdfs/bonemassmeasure-508.pdf.

  15. Romme EA, Murchison JT, Phang KF, Jansen FH, Rutten EP, Wouters EF, et al. Bone attenuation on routine chest CT correlates with bone mineral density on DXA in patients with COPD. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(11):2338–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SY, Kwon SS, Kim HS, Yoo JH, Kim J, Kim JY, et al. Reliability and validity of lower extremity computed tomography as a screening tool for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(4):1387–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-3013-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet (London, England). 2002;359(9321):1929–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08761-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lentle BC, Prior JC. Osteoporosis: what a clinician expects to learn from a Patient’s bone density examination. Radiology. 2003;228(3):620–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2283020093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mao SS, Li D, Syed YS, Gao Y, Luo Y, Flores F, et al. Thoracic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can sensitively monitor bone mineral metabolism: comparison of thoracic QCT vs lumbar QCT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in detection of age-relative change in bone mineral density. Academic Radiol. 2017;24(12):1582–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel PS, Lee JJ. Normative Vertebral Hounsfield Unit Values And Correlation With Bone Mineral Density. J Clin Exp Orthopaedics 02:14. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-8416.100014.

  21. Sheu Y, Cauley JA, Wheeler VW, Patrick AL, Bunker CH, Ensrud KE, et al. Age-related decline in bone density among ethnically diverse older men. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2011;22(2):599–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1330-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Silva IM, Freitas DQ, Ambrosano GM, Bóscolo FN, Almeida SM. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Brazilian Oral Res. 2012;26(6):550–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242012000600011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Won Y, Na M, Kim C, Kim J, Cheong J, Ryu JI, et al. The frontal skull Hounsfield unit value can predict ventricular enlargement in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:10178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28471-1.

  24. Kim YW, Kim JH, Yoon SH, Lee JH, Lee CH, Shin CS, et al. Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(1):329–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3724-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nam HS, Shin MH, Zmuda JM, Leung PC, Barrett-Connor E, Orwoll ES, et al. Race/ethnic differences in bone mineral densities in older men. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(12):2115–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1188-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SJ, Binkley N, Lubner MG, Bruce RJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(3):1131–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3318-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zou D, Li W, Deng C, Du G, Xu N. The use of CT Hounsfield unit values to identify the undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. European Spine J: Off Public European Spine Soc European Spinal Deformity Soc European Section Cervical Spine Res Soc. 2019;28(8):1758–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5776-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li YL, Wong KH, Law MW, Fang BX, Lau VW, Vardhanabuti VV, et al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis in abdominal computed tomography for Chinese population. Archives Osteoporosis. 2018;13(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0492-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pickhardt PJ, Lauder T, Pooler BD, Muñoz Del Rio A, Rosas H, Bruce RJ, et al. Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(1):147–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3224-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pompe E, Willemink MJ, Dijkhuis GR, Verhaar HJ, Mohamed Hoesein FA, de Jong PA. Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT. European Radiol. 2015;25(2):283–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3408-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lim HK, Ha HI, Park SY, Lee K. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of CT Hounsfield unit histogram analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting osteoporosis of the femur. European Radiol. 2019;29(4):1831–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5728-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim YS, Lee S, Sung YK, Lee BG. Assessment of osteoporosis using pelvic diagnostic computed tomography. J Bone Mineral Metab. 2016;34(4):457–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-015-0684-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Christensen DL, Nappo KE, Wolfe JA, Wade SM, Brooks DI, Potter BK, et al. Proximal femur Hounsfield units on CT colonoscopy correlate with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(4):850–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000000480

  34. Nam HS, Kweon SS, Choi JS, Zmuda JM, Leung PC, Lui LY, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in bone mineral density among older women. J Bone Min Metab. 2013;31(2):190–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-012-0402-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Subramaniam S, Chan C-Y, Soelaiman I-N, Mohamed N, Muhammad N, Ahmad F, et al. Development of osteoporosis screening algorithm for population aged 50 years and above in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072526.

  36. Subramaniam S, Chan C-Y, Soelaiman I-N, Mohamed N, Muhammad N, Ahmad F, et al. Prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis among the Chinese population in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Appl Sci. 2019;9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091820.

  37. Subramaniam S, Chan C-Y, Soelaiman I-N, Mohamed N, Muhammad N, Ahmad F, et al. The performance of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) in identifying the risk of osteoporosis among Malaysian population aged 40 years and above. Arch Osteoporos. 2019;14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0666-2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noorazrul Yahya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 24.3 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 The characteristics of the study patients from CT scan (n = 1043)
Table 2 The HU values based on BMD categories (based on number of examinations)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amin, M.F.M., Zakaria, W.M.W. & Yahya, N. Correlation between Hounsfield unit derived from head, thorax, abdomen, spine and pelvis CT and t-scores from DXA. Skeletal Radiol 50, 2525–2535 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03801-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03801-z

Keywords

Navigation