Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Slow-growing buttock mass after failure of incorporation of autologous fat transfer for gluteal augmentation: ultrasound and MRI features

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gluteal augmentation procedures are gaining popularity and encompass a variety of surgical techniques and methods of graft preparation. While surgical history remains essential for diagnosis, the radiologist must avoid pitfalls and rely on imaging features to recognize both the expected appearance and complications of gluteal augmentation procedures. We report a case of a slowly growing buttock mass after gluteal augmentation with autologous fat transfer 1 year after surgery. The potential diagnostic imaging pitfalls and characteristics on ultrasound and contrast-enhanced MRI are discussed. Multiplicity of fat-containing lesions depicted on large field-of-view images and granulated appearance of the intralesional fat on MRI should allow the radiologist to recognize the appearance of failed fat graft incorporation that can present as a slowly growing encapsulated collection with layered fat and fluid contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mofid MM, Teitelbaum S, Suissa D, Ramirez-Montañana A, Astarita DC, Mendieta C, et al. Report on mortality from gluteal fat grafting: recommendations from the ASERF Task Force. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(7):796–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts TL, Toledo LS, Badin AZ. Augmentation of the buttocks by micro fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J. 2001;21(4):311–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sinno S, Chang JB, Brownstone ND, Saadeh PB, Wall S. Determining the safety and efficacy of gluteal augmentation: a systematic review of outcomes and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(4):1151–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin DJ, Wong TT, Ciavarra GA, Kazam JK. Adventures and misadventures in plastic surgery and soft-tissue implants. RadioGraphics. 2017;37(7):2145–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic surgery statistics report [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2018/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2018.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2019.

  6. Toledo LS. Gluteal augmentation with fat grafting: the Brazilian buttock technique: 30 years’ experience. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(2):253–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Woman dies after butt lift procedure at South Florida Surgical Center [Internet]. NBC 6 South Florida. Available from: http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Woman-Dies-After-Butt-Lift-Procedure-at-South-Florida-Surgical-Center-509768461.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2019.

  8. The alarming way that Brazilian butt lifts have been killing patients [Internet]. HuffPost. 2018. Available from: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/brazilian-butt-lift-risks_n_5b6c39c1e4b0530743c77cf6. Accessed 14 Nov 2019.

  9. Mendieta CG. Gluteal reshaping. Aesthet Surg J. 2007;27(6):641–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chia CT, Theodorou SJ, Dayan E, Tabbal G, Del Vecchio D. “Brazilian butt lift” under local anesthesia: a novel technique addressing safety concerns. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(6):1468–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghavami A, Villanueva NL. Gluteal augmentation and contouring with autologous fat transfer: part I. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(2):249–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu M, Cohen SR, Hicok KC, Shanahan RK, Strem BM, Yu JC, et al. Comparison of three different fat graft preparation methods: gravity separation, centrifugation, and simultaneous washing with filtration in a closed system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(4):873–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mashiko T, Yoshimura K. How does fat survive and remodel after grafting? Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(2):181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin J-Y, Wang C, Pu LLQ. Can we standardize the techniques for fat grafting? Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(2):199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cansancao AL, Condé-Green A, David JA, Vidigal RA. Subcutaneous-only gluteal fat grafting: a prospective study of the long-term results with ultrasound analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(2):447–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burkholz KJ, Roberts CC, Lidner TK. Posttraumatic pseudolipoma (fat necrosis) mimicking atypical lipoma or liposarcoma on MRI. Radiol Case Rep. 2015;2(2):56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Canteli B, Saez F, de los Ríos A, Alvarez C. Fat necrosis. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25(3):305–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson P, Farrant JM, Bourke G, Merchant W, McKie S, Horgan KJ. Ultrasound and MRI findings in appendicular and truncal fat necrosis. Skelet Radiol. 2008;37(3):217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morel-Lavallée VAF. Decollements traumatiques de la peau et des couches sous-jacentes. Arch Gen Med. 1863;1:300–32.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hak DJ, Olson SA, Matta JM. Diagnosis and management of closed internal degloving injuries associated with pelvic and acetabular fractures: the Morel-Lavallée lesion. J Trauma. 1997;42(6):1046–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonilla-Yoon I, Masih S, Patel DB, White EA, Levine BD, Chow K, et al. The Morel-Lavallée lesion: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging features, and treatment options. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21(1):35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zecha PJ, Missotten FEM. Pseudocyst formation after abdominoplasty – extravasations of Morel-Lavallée. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(6):500–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keramidas EG, Rodopoulou S, Khan U. Pseudo-cyst formation after abdominoplasty combined with liposuction: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Plast Surg. 2006;28(6):400–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scaranelo AM, Davanço RAS. Pseudocyst formation after abdominal liposuction—extravasations of Morel–Lavallée on MR images. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(6):849–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dawre S, Lamba S. H S, Gupta S, Gupta AK. The Morel-Lavallee lesion: a review and a proposed algorithmic approach. Eur J Plast Surg. 2012;35(7):489–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ersek RA, Schade K. Subcutaneous pseudobursa secondary to suction and surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(3):442–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Khan UD. Seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a retrospective clinical review following three different techniques. Eur J Plast Surg. 2012;35(4):299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scolaro JA, Chao T, Zamorano DP. The Morel-Lavallée lesion: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(10):667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kottmeier SA, Wilson SC, Born CT, Hanks GA, Iannacone WM, DeLong WG. Surgical management of soft tissue lesions associated with pelvic ring injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(329):46–53.

  30. Mellado JM, Bencardino JT. Morel-Lavallée lesion: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005;13(4):775–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mellado JM, del Palomar LP, Díaz L, Ramos A, Saurí A. Long-standing Morel-Lavallée lesions of the trochanteric region and proximal thigh: MRI features in five patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(5):1289–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vassalou EE, Zibis AH, Raoulis VA, Tsifountoudis IP, Karantanas AH. Morel-Lavallée lesions of the knee: MRI findings compared with cadaveric study findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(5):W234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tejwani SG, Cohen SB, Bradley JP. Management of Morel-Lavallee lesion of the knee: twenty-seven cases in the national football league. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1162–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Neal C, Jacobson JA, Brandon C, Kalume-Brigido M, Morag Y, Girish G. Sonography of Morel-Lavallée lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(7):1077–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hudson DA, Knottenbelt JD, Krige JE. Closed degloving injuries: results following conservative surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(5):853–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dodwad SNM, Niedermeier SR, Yu E, Ferguson TA, Klineberg EO, Khan SN. The Morel-Lavallée lesion revisited: management in spinopelvic dissociation. Spine J. 2015;15(6):e45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Khashper A, Zheng J, Nahal A, Discepola F. Imaging characteristics of spindle cell lipoma and its variants. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(5):591–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ, Peterson JJ, Sundaram M, Murphey MD, O’Connor MI. Imaging characteristics of spindle cell Lipoma. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(5):1251–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fletcher CD, Martin-Bates E. Spindle cell lipoma: a clinicopathological study with some original observations. Histopathology. 1987;11(8):803–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Barile A, Zugaro L, Catalucci A, Caulo M, Di Cesare E, Splendiani A, et al. Soft tissue liposarcoma: histological subtypes, MRI and CT findings. Radiol Med. 2002;104(3):140–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkat Masarapu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masarapu, V., Wang, P.S. & Gorbachova, T. Slow-growing buttock mass after failure of incorporation of autologous fat transfer for gluteal augmentation: ultrasound and MRI features. Skeletal Radiol 49, 1669–1675 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03487-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03487-9

Keywords

Navigation