Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency of knee ultrasound for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of knee ultrasound for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.

Materials and methods

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies that used ultrasound for diagnosing ACL and PCL injuries. Bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling was used to evaluate diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed by assessing studies conducted using the ultrasound technique (functional ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound) for diagnosing ACL injury. We performed meta-regression analyses for a potential source of heterogeneity.

Results

Eleven (938 ultrasound/878 patients) and six articles (281 ultrasound/237 patients) were included for ACL and PCL injuries respectively. The summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic for ACL and PCL injuries were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–0.93) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.49–1.00), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.73–1.00), and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.98) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00) respectively. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference between sensitivity (p = 0.63) and specificity (p = 0.72) of functional and conventional ultrasound. Among the various potential covariates, patient enrollment, patient position, and ultrasound performer were associated with heterogeneity in terms of sensitivity, and proportion of the ACL injury was associated with heterogeneity in terms of specificity.

Conclusion

Knee ultrasound demonstrates high diagnostic performance for ACL and PCL injuries, particularly when performed by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Future prospective studies to compare the cost- and time-effectiveness between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging and to determine the optimal ultrasound parameters are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knutson T, Bothwell J, Durbin R. Evaluation and management of traumatic knee injuries in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2015;33(2):345–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parwaiz H, Teo AQ, Servant C. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: a persistently difficult diagnosis. Knee. 2016;23(1):116–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LaPrade CM, Civitarese DM, Rasmussen MT, LaPrade RF. Emerging updates on the posterior cruciate ligament: a review of the current literature. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(12):3077–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bronstein RD, Schaffer JC. Physical examination of knee ligament injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(4):280–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Decary S, Ouellet P, Vendittoli PA, Roy JS, Desmeules F. Diagnostic validity of physical examination tests for common knee disorders: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2017;23:143–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinto A, Pinto F, Faggian A, Rubini G, Caranci F, Macarini L, et al. Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, PRISMA-DTA Group, et al. preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA. 2018;319(4):388–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim KW, Lee J, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers. I. General guidance and tips. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16(6):1175–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers. II. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16(6):1188–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Suh CH, Park SH. Successful publication of systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(1):5–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.

  14. Deville WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(9):882–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller TT. Sonography of injury of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31(3):149–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang CY, Wang HK, Hsu CY, Shieh JY, Wang TG, Jiang CC. Role of sonographic examination in traumatic knee internal derangement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(8):984–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cho KH, Lee DC, Chhem RK, Kim SD, Bouffard JA, Cardinal E, et al. Normal and acutely torn posterior cruciate ligament of the knee at US evaluation: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2001;219(2):375–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedl W, Glaser F. Dynamic sonography in the diagnosis of ligament and meniscal injuries of the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110(3):132–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fuchs S, Chylarecki C. Sonographic evaluation of ACL rupture signs compared to arthroscopic findings in acutely injured knees. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(2):149–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gebhard F, Authenrieth M, Strecker W, Kinzl L, Hehl G. Ultrasound evaluation of gravity induced anterior drawer following anterior cruciate ligament lesion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(3):166–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grzelak P, Podgorski MT, Stefanczyk L, Domzalski M. Ultrasonographic test for complete anterior cruciate ligament injury. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(2):143–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsu CC, Tsai WC, Chen CP, Yeh WL, Tang SF, Kuo JK. Ultrasonographic examination of the normal and injured posterior cruciate ligament. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;33(6):277–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan Z, Faruqui Z, Ogyunbiyi O, Rosset G, Iqbal J. Ultrasound assessment of internal derangement of the knee. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72(1):72–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar S, Kumar A, Kumar S, Kumar P. Functional ultrasonography in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament injury as compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52(6):638–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mautner K, Sussman WI, Nanos K, Blazuk J, Brigham C, Sarros E. Validity of indirect ultrasound findings in acute anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. J Ultrasound Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Palm HG, Bergenthal G, Ehry P, Schwarz W, Schmidt R, Friemert B. Functional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a field study. Knee. 2009;16(6):441–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ptasznik R, Feller J, Bartlett J, Fitt G, Mitchell A, Hennessy O. The value of sonography in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(6):1461–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Skovgaard Larsen LP, Rasmussen OS. Diagnosis of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee by sonography. Eur J Ultrasound. 2000;12(2):163–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sorrentino F, Iovane A, Nicosia A, Candela F, Midiri M, Lagalla R. Role of high-resolution ultrasonography without and with real-time spatial compound imaging in evaluating the injured posterior cruciate ligament: preliminary study. Radiol Med. 2009;114(2):312–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki S, Kasahara K, Futami T, Iwasaki R, Ueo T, Yamamuro T. Ultrasound diagnosis of pathology of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110(4):200–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang CY, Shih TTF, Wang HK, Chiu YN, Wang TG. The accuracy of ultrasonographic examination of injured posterior cruciate ligament. J Med Ultrasound. 2009;17(4):187–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang LY, Yang TH, Huang YC, Chou WY, Huang CC, Wang CJ. Evaluating posterior cruciate ligament injury by using two-dimensional ultrasonography and sonoelastography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(10):3108–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. James EW, Williams BT, LaPrade RF. Stress radiography for the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(9):2644–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Perera NS, Joel J, Bunola JA. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: delay to diagnosis. Injury. 2013;44(12):1862–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee SH, Yun SJ. Diagnosis of simultaneous acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament using point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(3):335–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsai WH, Chiang YP, Lew RJ. Sonographic examination of knee ligaments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(8):e77–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ultrasound guidelines: emergency, point-of-care and clinical ultrasound guidelines in medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(5):e27–54.

  39. Wang J, Wu H, Dong F, Li B, Wei Z, Peng Q, et al. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;18(4):579–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the 2018 Inje University research grant (Grant No. 20180096).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, 1342 Dongil-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01757, Republic of Korea

    Sun Hwa Lee

  2. Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05278, Republic of Korea

    Seong Jong Yun

Authors
  1. Sun Hwa Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seong Jong Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Jong Yun.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was not required because this study was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.H., Yun, S.J. Efficiency of knee ultrasound for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 48, 1599–1610 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03225-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03225-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation