Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The aponeurotic expansion of the supraspinatus tendon: anatomy and prevalence in a series of 150 shoulder MRIs

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To describe the aponeurotic expansion of the supraspinatus tendon with anatomic correlations and determine its prevalence in a series of patients imaged with MRI.

Materials and methods

In the first part of this HIPAA-compliant and IRB-approved study, we retrospectively reviewed 150 consecutive MRI studies of the shoulder obtained on a 1.5-T system. The aponeurotic expansion at the level of the bicipital groove was classified as: not visualized (type 0), flat-shaped (type 1), oval-shaped and less than 50 % the size of the adjacent long head of the biceps section (type 2A), or oval-shaped and more than 50 % the size of the adjacent long head of the biceps section (type 2B). In the second part of this study, we examined both shoulders of 25 cadavers with ultrasound. When aponeurotic expansion was seen at US, a dissection was performed to characterize its origin and termination.

Results

An aponeurotic expansion of the supraspinatus located anterior and lateral to the long head of the biceps in its groove was clearly demonstrated in 49 % of the shoulders with MRI. According to our classification, its shape was type 1 in 35 %, type 2A in 10 % and type 2B in 4 %. This structure was also identified in 28 of 50 cadaveric shoulders with ultrasound and confirmed at dissection in 10 cadavers (20 shoulders). This structure originated from the most anterior and superficial aspect of the supraspinatus tendon and inserted distally on the pectoralis major tendon.

Conclusion

The aponeurotic expansion of the supraspinatus tendon can be identified with MRI or ultrasound in about half of the shoulders. It courses anteriorly and laterally to the long head of the biceps tendon, outside its synovial sheath.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheah K, Bredella MA, Warner JJ, Halpern EF, Palmer WE. Transverse thickening along the articular surface of the rotator cuff consistent with the rotator cable: identification with MR arthrography and relevance in rotator cuff evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(3):679–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gheno R, Zoner CS, Buck FM, et al. Accessory head of biceps brachii muscle: anatomy, histology, and MRI in cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):W80–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goh CK, Peh WC. Pictorial essay: pitfalls in magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Can Assoc Radiol J J Assoc Can Radiol. 2012;63(4):247–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brodie CG. Note on the transverse-humeral, coraco-acromial, and coraco-humeral ligaments, &c. J Anat Physiol. 1890;24(Pt 2):247–52.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark JM, Harryman 2nd DT. Tendons, ligaments, and capsule of the rotator cuff. Gross and microscopic anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(5):713–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beall DP, Williamson EE, Ly JQ, et al. Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(3):633–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buck FM, Grehn H, Hilbe M, Pfirrmann CW, Manzanell S, Hodler J. Degeneration of the long biceps tendon: comparison of MRI with gross anatomy and histology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(5):1367–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morag Y, Jacobson JA, Shields G, et al. MR arthrography of rotator interval, long head of the biceps brachii, and biceps pulley of the shoulder. Radiology. 2005;235(1):21–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buck FM, Dietrich TJ, Resnick D, Jost B, Pfirrmann CW. Long biceps tendon: normal position, shape, and orientation in its groove in neutral position and external and internal rotation. Radiology. 2011;261(3):872–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradbury SA, Hoshino K. An improved embalming procedure for long-lasting preservation of the cadaver for anatomical study. Acta Anat. 1978;101(2):97–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thiel W. Die Konservierung ganzer Leichen in naturlichen Farben. Ann Anat. 1992;174(3):185–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiel W. Erganzung fur die Konservierung ganzer Leichen nach W. Thiel. Ann Anat. 2002;184(3):267–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammad RB, Mohamed A. Unilateral four-headed pectoralis muscle major. Mcgill J Med. 2006;9(1):28–30.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MacDonald K, Bridger J, Cash C, Parkin I. Transverse humeral ligament: does it exist? Clin Anat. 2007;20(6):663–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dierickx C, Ceccarelli E, Conti M, Vanlommel J, Castagna A. Variations of the intra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon: a classification of embryologically explained variations. J Should Elb Surg. 2009;18(4):556–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez-Niedenfuhr M, Vazquez T, Choi D, Parkin I, Sanudo JR. Supernumerary humeral heads of the biceps brachii muscle revisited. Clin Anat. 2003;16(3):197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asvat R, Candler P, Sarmiento EE. High incidence of the third head of biceps brachii in South African populations. J Anat. 1993;182(Pt 1):101–4.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Santo Neto H, Camilli JA, Andrade JC, Meciano Filho J, Marques MJ. On the incidence of the biceps brachii third head in Brazilian white and blacks. Ann Anat. 1998;180(1):69–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Le Double AF. Traité des variations musculaires de l’homme et de leur signification au point de vue de l’anthropologie zoologique. Paris: Schleicher frères; 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Testut L. Les anomalies musculaires chez l’homme expliquées par l’anatomie comparée, leur importance en anthropologie. Paris: Masson; 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kosugi K, Shibata S, Yamashita H. Supernumerary head of biceps brachii and branching pattern of the musculocutaneus nerve in Japanese. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992;14(2):175–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vahlensieck M, Pollack M, Lang P, Grampp S, Genant HK. Two segments of the supraspinous muscle: cause of high signal intensity at MR imaging? Radiology. 1993;186(2):449–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mochizuki T, Sugaya H, Uomizu M, et al. Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):962–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roh MS, Wang VM, April EW, Pollock RG, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL. Anterior and posterior musculotendinous anatomy of the supraspinatus. J Should Elb Surg. 2000;9(5):436–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gagey N, Gagey O, Bastian G, Lassau JP. The fibrous frame of the supraspinatus muscle. Correlations between anatomy and MRI findings. Surg Radiol Anat. 1990;12(4):291–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burkhart SS, Esch JC, Jolson RS. The rotator crescent and rotator cable: an anatomic description of the shoulder’s “suspension bridge”. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(6):611–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Thomas P. Moser & Nathalie J. Bureau

  2. Radiologie Laënnec, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Étienne Cardinal

  3. Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France

    Raphaël Guillin

  4. Pathology Department, Hôpital du Centre-de-la-Mauricie, Shawinigan, QC, Canada

    Pascale Lanneville

  5. Anatomy Department, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada

    Detlev Grabs

Authors
  1. Thomas P. Moser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Étienne Cardinal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nathalie J. Bureau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raphaël Guillin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pascale Lanneville
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Detlev Grabs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas P. Moser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moser, T.P., Cardinal, É., Bureau, N.J. et al. The aponeurotic expansion of the supraspinatus tendon: anatomy and prevalence in a series of 150 shoulder MRIs. Skeletal Radiol 44, 223–231 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1993-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1993-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation