Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of MRI abnormalities of the sacroiliac joints and their ability to predict axial spondyloarthritis: a retrospective pilot study on 110 patients

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess sacroiliac joint (SIJ) modifications on MRI and their ability to predict axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) with the purpose of identifying parameters for future prospective studies.

Methods

Retrospective study was carried out of 110 consecutive patients referred for SIJ MRI with coronal, axial short TI inversion recovery (STIR), and axial T1 sequences over 6 months. Factors associated with SpA, including MRI SIJ modifications (fat deposition, structural abnormalities on T1-weighted images, and bone marrow edema [BME] on STIR sequences) and age were explored using multivariate logistic regression. The reference diagnosis was made 1–1.5 years later based on clinical, radiological, and biological findings, according to Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with SpA (female/male: 19/9, age 41 ± 13 years). Abnormal findings were found in up to 21 % of patients without SpA (including 11 % with BME), versus 64 % of SpA patients (50 % with BME). A threshold age of 42.6 years was found to discriminate SpA patients (ROC AUC: 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.59–0.81). BME location in the sacral (OR: 7.07 [1.05, 47.6], p = 0.044) and both sacral and iliac areas (OR: 36.0 [5.61, 231], p = 0.0002), as well as age (OR: 0.95 [0.92, 0.98], p = 0.0019) were found to be independent predictors of SpA. 83.6 % of patients were effectively diagnosed using BME location and patient age in a classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm (sensitivity: 61 %, specificity: 91 %, PPV: 71 %, NPV: 87 %).

Conclusion

The BME location combined with the patient’s age (threshold 42.6 years) could help predict SpA. Further studies are required before these features can be used by radiologists to boost their confidence in reporting SIJ MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khan MA, van der Linden SM. Ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthropathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1990;16(3):551–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goie The HS, Steven MM, van der Linden SM, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison of the Rome, New York and modified New York criteria in patients with a positive clinical history screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1985;24(3):242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(10):1520–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rudwaleit M, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):770–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aydin SZ, Maksymowych WP, Bennett AN, McGonagle D, Emery P, Marzo-Ortega H. Validation of the ASAS criteria and definition of a positive MRI of the sacroiliac joint in an inception cohort of axial spondyloarthritis followed up for 8 years. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(1):56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber U, Zubler V, Pedersen SJ, et al. Development and validation of an MRI reference criterion for defining a positive SIJ MRI in spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(6):977–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zanetti M, Bruder E, Romero J, Hodler J. Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology. 2000;215(3):835–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu L, Hayashi D, Roemer FW, Felson DT, Guermazi A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Subchondral Bone Marrow Lesions in Association with Osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;42(2):105–18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rudwaleit M, Braun J, Sieper J. ASAS classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis. Z Rheumatol. 2009;68(7):591–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landis JR. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Breiman LFJ, Olshen R, Stone C. Classification and regression trees. Belmont: Wadsworth; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weber U, Lambert RG, Ostergaard M, Hodler J, Pedersen SJ, Maksymowych WP. The diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in spondylarthritis: an international multicenter evaluation of one hundred eighty-seven subjects. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(10):3048–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McLauchlan GJ, Gardner DL. Sacral and iliac articular cartilage thickness and cellularity: relationship to subchondral bone end-plate thickness and cancellous bone density. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;41(4):375–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bollow M, Hermann KG, Biedermann T, Sieper J, Schontube M, Braun J. Very early spondyloarthritis: where the inflammation in the sacroiliac joints starts. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(11):1644–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bollow M, Biedermann T, Kannenberg J, et al. Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to detect sacroiliitis in HLA-B27 positive and negative children with juvenile arthritides. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(3):556–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Madsen KB, Egund N, Jurik AG. Grading of inflammatory disease activity in the sacroiliac joints with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between short-tau inversion recovery and gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences. J Rheumatol. 2009;37(2):393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber U, Lambert RG, Pedersen SJ, Hodler J, Ostergaard M, Maksymowych WP. Assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliac joints enhances diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early spondylarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(12):1763–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber U PS, Hodler J, Ostergaard M, Lambert RG, Maksymowych WP Does fat infiltration in sacroiliac joint contribute to the diagnostic utility of MRI in ankylosing spondylitis? Arthrtis Rheum. 2009;(Suppl 10):54.

  20. Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Egund N, et al. Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol. 2003;44(2):218–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weber U, Pedersen SJ, Ostergaard M, Rufibach K, Lambert RG, Maksymowych WP. Can erosions on MRI of the sacroiliac joints be reliably detected in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?—A cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(3):R124.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Cyteval.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larbi, A., Viala, P., Molinari, N. et al. Assessment of MRI abnormalities of the sacroiliac joints and their ability to predict axial spondyloarthritis: a retrospective pilot study on 110 patients. Skeletal Radiol 43, 351–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1789-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1789-y

Keywords

Navigation