Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the validity, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reproducibility of a digital templating system, the Mdesk™ in preoperative templating in cemented and reverse hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Materials and methods
Validity was evaluated by comparing the planned cup size, stem size, CCD angles, and neck length with the components used in 129 patients operated with cemented and reverse hybrid THA. The reliability was measured by comparing the templating results of two surgeons with each other (interobserver) and the results of two templatings carried out by first surgeon (intraobserver). The leg length discrepancy was measured before and after the operation to assess the templating ability to correct it.
Results
The Mdesk™ system showed good validity (kappa value ranged from 0.64 to 0.96), especially when one size over and under the planned size were included. No difference between cemented and cementless stems was found. The interobserver reliability ranged from fair (kappa 0.23) to substantial (kappa 0.61) while the intraobserver reproducibility ranged from substantial (kappa 0.70) to excellent (kappa 0.82). Templating and intraoperative measures succeeded to restore the leg length.
Conclusions
The Mdesk™ system has comparable validity and reliability with other templating systems used in clinical practice. We recommend that the same surgeon who does the preoperative radiographic templating to also perform the operation. Further studies are required to evaluate the results of succeeded templating in the long run.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1998;80-B:382.
Blackley HR, Howell GE, Rorabeck CH. Planning and management of the difficult primary hip replacement: preoperative planning and technical considerations. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:3–11.
Bono JB. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2004;86:118.
Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:455.
Knight JL, Atwater RD. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7(Suppl):403–9.
Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR. Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:507–13.
Gonzalez Della Valle A, Slullitel G, Piccaluga F, Salvati EA. The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:51–8.
Suh KT, Cheon SJ, Kim DW. Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:40–4.
Davila JA, Kransdorf MJ, Duffy GP. Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:390–3.
Olsen M, Gamble P, Chiu M, Tumia N, Boyle Schemitsch EH. Assessment of accuracy and reliability in preoperative templating for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(3):445–9.
Gamble P, de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Winemaer M. The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(4):529–32.
Iorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Hartman A, Healy WL. A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. Is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(2):175–9.
Steinberg EL, Shash N, Menahem A, Dekel S. Preoperative planning of total hip replacement using the TraumaCad™ system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1429–32.
Zhao X, Zhu ZA, Zhao J, Li MQ, Wang G, Yu DG, et al. The utility of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with Crowe type II and III dysplastic hips. Int Orthop. 2011;35:631–8.
Efe T, El-Zayat BF, Heyse TJ, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Schmitt J. Precision of preoperative digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:616–21.
Horneij E, Holmström E, Hemborg B, Isberg PE, Ekdahl C. Interrater reliability and between-days repeatability of eight physical performance tests. Adv Physiother. 2002;4:146–60.
Rheault W, Albright B, Byers C, Franta M, Johnson A, Skowronek M. Intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;15:147–50.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Lindell O, Eriksson L, Strender L-E. The reliability of a 10-test package for patients with prolonged back and neck pain: could an examiner without formal medical education be used without loss of quality? A methodological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:31.
Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1979. p. 246.
Müller ME. Total hip replacement: planning, technique and complications. In: Surgical management of degenerative arthritis of the lower limb. Philadelphia: Lea and Faber 1975; 90–113.
Crooijmans H, Laumen A, van Pul C, van Mourik J. A new digital preoperative planning method for total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(4):909–16.
The B, Diercks R, van Ooijen P, Van Horn JR. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:78–84.
Kosashvili Y, Shasha N, Olschewski E, Safir O, White L, Gross A, et al. Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2009;52(1):6–11.
Della Valle GA, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati EA. The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2008;32:289–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bertz, A., Indrekvam, K., Ahmed, M. et al. Validity and reliability of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty using a digital templating system. Skeletal Radiol 41, 1245–1249 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1431-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1431-4