Skip to main content
Log in

MRI-based volumetric assessment of joint effusion in knee osteoarthritis using proton density-weighted fat-suppressed and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed sequences

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Loeuille D, Chary-Valckenaere I, Champigneulle J, Rat AC, Toussaint F, Pinzano-Watrin A, et al. Macroscopic and microscopic features of synovial membrane inflammation in the osteoarthritic knee: correlating magnetic resonance imaging findings with disease severity. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3492–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez-Madrid F, Karvonen RL, Teitge RA, Miller PR, An T, Negendank WG. Synovial thickening detected by MR imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee confirmed by biopsy as synovitis. Magn Reson Imaging. 1995;13:177–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill CL, Gale DG, Chaisson CE, Skinner K, Kazis L, Gale ME, et al. Knee effusions, popliteal cysts, and synovial thickening: association with knee pain in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1330–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayral X, Pickering EH, Woodworth TG, Mackillop N, Dougados M. Synovitis: a potential predictive factor of structural progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis – results of a 1 year longitudinal arthroscopic study in 422 patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:361–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PF, Miaux Y, White D, et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12:177–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunter DJ, Lo GH, Gale D, Grainger AJ, Guermazi A, Conaghan PG. The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:206–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roemer FW, Javaid MK, Guermazi A, Thomas M, Kiran A, Keen R, et al. Anatomical distribution of synovitis in knee osteoarthritis and its association with joint effusion assessed on non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:1269–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roemer FW, Guermazi A, Felson DT, Niu J, Nevitt MC, Crema MD, et al. Baseline effusion but not synovitis predicts cartilage loss over 30 months in subjects without tibiofemoral osteoarthritis—results from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;59:S72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fotinos-Hoyer AK, Guermazi A, Jara H, Eckstein F, Ozonoff A, Khard H, et al. Assessment of synovitis in the osteoarthritic knee: comparison between manual segmentation, semi-automated segmentation and semiquantitative assessment using contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010;64(2):604–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ostergaard M. Different approaches to synovial membrane volume determination by magnetic resonance imaging: manual versus automated segmentation. Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36:1166–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;31:1116–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmid MR, Hodler J, Vienne P, Binkert CA, Zanetti M. Bone marrow abnormalities of foot and ankle: STIR versus T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;224:463–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Correlation. In: Principles of biostatistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury, 2000. pp 398–414

  14. Li W, Abram F, Pelletier JP, Raynauld JP, Dorais M, d’Anjou MA, et al. Fully automated system for the quantification of human osteoarthritic knee joint effusion volume using magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy KP, Szopinski KT, Cohan RH, Mermillod B, Ellis JH. Occurrence of adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast material and management of patients at increased risk: a survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Fellowship Directors. Acad Radiol. 1999;6:656–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loeuille D, Rat AC, Goebel JC, Champigneulle J, Blum A, Netter P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis: which method best reflects synovial membrane inflammation? Correlations with clinical, macroscopic and microscopic features. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17(9):1186–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker K, Grainger A, Niu J, Clancy M, Guermazi A, Crema M, et al. Relation of synovitis to knee pain using contrast-enhanced MRIs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1779–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterfy CG, Gold G, Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Dardzinski B, Stevens R. MRI protocols for whole-organ assessment of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(Suppl A):A95–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Lovgreen-Nielsen P, Volck B, Sonne-Holm S, Lorenzen I. Quantification of synovitis by MRI: correlation between dynamic and static gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and microscopic and macroscopic signs of synovial inflammation. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;16:743–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The study was supported by a grant of the “Private Practice for Musculoskeletal MRI” Ulmer Landstr. 315, 86391 Stadtbergen, Germany. The funding source did not have any role in the present publication.

Dr. Guermazi has received consultancies, speaking fees, and/or honoraria (less than $10,000 each) from Facet Solutions, Genzyme, and Stryker, and (more than $10,000) from Merck Serono, and is the President of Boston Imaging Core Lab (BICL). He receives research funding from General Electric Healthcare. Dr. Roemer is Vice President and a shareholder of BICL. Dr. Crema is a shareholder of BICL.

None of the other authors have declared any possible conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank W. Roemer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Habib, S., Guermazi, A., Ozonoff, A. et al. MRI-based volumetric assessment of joint effusion in knee osteoarthritis using proton density-weighted fat-suppressed and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed sequences. Skeletal Radiol 40, 1581–1585 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1200-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1200-9

Keywords

Navigation