Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of MR-arthrography and MDCT-arthrography for detection of labral and articular cartilage hip pathology

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the diagnostic ability of MR arthrography (MRa) and MDCT arthrography (CTa) in depicting surgically proven hip labral tears and articular cartilage degradation.

Materials and methods

Labral pathology and articular cartilage were prospectively evaluated with MRa and CTa in 14 hips of 10 patients. The findings were evaluated by two independent observers (a musculoskeletal fellow and one senior musculoskeletal radiologist). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value were determined using arthroscopic and open surgery findings as the standard of reference. Interobserver agreement was recorded. All images were assessed for the presence of a labral tear (according to Czerny classification) and for cartilage erosion using a 3 point scale for both methods: 1 = complete visualization-sharp edges, 2 = blurred edges fissuring-partial defects, 3 = exposed bone. The same classification was applied surgically.

Results

Disagreement between the senior observer and the fellow observer was recorded in three cases of labral tearing with MRa and six with CTa. Disagreement was also found in four cases of cartilage erosion with both MRa and CTa. The percent sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value for correctly assessing the labral tear were as follows for MRa/CTa, respectively: 100/15, 50/13, 90/14, and 90/13 (P < 0.05). The same values for cartilage assessment were 63/66, 33/40, 50/57 and 55/66 (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Interobserver reproducibility with MRa is very good for labral tearing assessment. MRa is better for assessing labral tears. CTa shows better, but not statistically significant, demonstration of the articular cartilage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–e
Fig. 2a–d
Fig. 3a, b
Fig. 4a–d
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmid MR, Nötzli HP, Zanetti M, Wyss TF, Hodler J. Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. Radiology. 2003;226:382–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Toomayan GA, Holman WR, Major NM, Kozlowicz SM, Vail TP. Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:449–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jessel RH, Zilkens C, Tiderius C, Dudda M, Mamisch TC, Kim YJ. Assessment of osteoarthritis in hips with femoroacetabular impingement using delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zilkens C, Miese F, Bittersohl B et al. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), after slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Eur J Radiol. 2010 May 24. [Epub ahead of print]

  5. Zilkens C, Holstein A, Bittersohl B, et al. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage in the long-term follow-up after Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bittersohl B, Hosalkar HS, Hughes T, et al. Feasibility of T2* mapping for the evaluation of hip joint cartilage at 1.5T using a three-dimensional (3D), gradient-echo (GRE) sequence: a prospective study. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:896–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:1433–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sur S, Mamisch TC, Hughes T, Kim YJ. High resolution fast T1 mapping technique for dGEMRIC. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:896–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bittersohl B, Hosalkar HS, Werlen S, Trattnig S, Siebenrock KA, Mamisch TC. Intravenous versus intra-articular delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the hip joint: a comparative analysis. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:538–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Domayer SE, Mamisch TC, Kress I, Chan J, Kim YJ. Radial dGEMRIC in developmental dysplasia of the hip and in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary results. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Aug 18. [Epub ahead of print]

  11. Bharam S. Labral tears, extra-articular injuries, and hip arthroscopy in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25(2):279–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Kendall S, Chaudhuri R, Thomas P. A preliminary report on prevalence of acetabular labrum tears in sports patients with groin pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:403–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fricker PA. Management of groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31:97–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robertson WJ, Kadrmas WR, Kelly BT. Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kramer J, Recht MP. MR arthrography of the lower extremity. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40(5):1121–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McCarthy JC, Noble PC, Schuck MR, et al. The Otto E Aufranc Award the role of labral lesions to development of early degenerative hip disease. Clin Orthop. 2001;393:25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alvarez C, Chicheportiche V, Lequesne M, Vicaut E, Laredo JD. Contribution of helical computed tomography to the evaluation of early hip osteoarthritis: a study in 18 patients. J Joint Bone Spine. 2005;72:578–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Balkissoon A. MR imaging of cartilage: evaluation and comparison of MR imaging techniques. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;8:57–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Petersilge CA, Haque MA, Petersilge WJ, Lewin JS, Lieberman JM, Buly R. Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1996;200:231–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hodler J, Yu JS, Goddwin D, et al. MR arthrography of the hip: improved imaging of the acetabular labrum with histologic correlation in cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:887–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A, et al. Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology. 1996;200:225–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petersilge CA. MR arthrography for evaluation of the acetabular labrum. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:423–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nishii T, Tanaka H, Nakanishi K, Sugano N, Miki H, Yoshikawa H. Fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient- echo MRI and MDCT arthrography of articular cartilage in patients with hip dysplasia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:379–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kassarjian A, Yoon LS, Belzile E, Connolly SA, Millis MB, Palmer WE. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2005;236:588–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Czerny C, Hofmann S, Urban M, et al. MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:345–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:578–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Leary JA, Berend K, Vail TP. The relationship between diagnosis and outcome in arthroscopy of the hip. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:181–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelly BT, Weiland DE, Schenker ML, Philippon MJ. Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wenger DE, Kendell KR, Miner MR, Trousdale RT. Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:145–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sundberg TP, Toomayan GA, Major NM. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR Imaging compared with 1.5-T MR arthrography: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2006;238:706–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bruce W, Van Der Wall H, Storey G, Loneragan R, Pitsis G, Kannangara S. Bone scintigraphy in acetabular labral tears. Clin Nucl Med. 2004;29:465–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Andreisek G, Duc SR, Froehlich JM, Hodler J, Weishaupt D. MR arthrography of the shoulder, hip, and wrist: evaluation of contrast dynamics and image quality with increasing injection-to-imaging time. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1081–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ziegert AJ, Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Keene JS, Shinki K, Fine JP. Comparison of standard hip MR arthrographic imaging planes and sequences for detection of arthroscopically proven labral tear. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1397–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Poilvache P, Jamart J, Materne R, Lengele B, et al. Assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with dual-detector spiral CT arthrography and MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;222:430–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wyler A, Bousson V, Bergot C, et al. Comparison of MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in hyaline cartilage-thickness measurement in radiographically normal cadaver hips with anatomy as gold standard. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2009;17:19–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos Perdikakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perdikakis, E., Karachalios, T., Katonis, P. et al. Comparison of MR-arthrography and MDCT-arthrography for detection of labral and articular cartilage hip pathology. Skeletal Radiol 40, 1441–1447 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1111-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1111-9

Keywords

Navigation