Abstract
Objective
To demonstrate MR imaging findings in the cortical and trabecular bone as well as marrow changes in patients with disuse osteoporosis (DO).
Materials and Methods
Sixteen patients (14 men, 2 women, aged 27–86 years) with clinical and radiographic evidence of DO of a lower limb joint (10 knees, 6 ankles) with MR examination of the same joint performed within a 1-month period were selected, as well as 16 healthy volunteers (7 men, 9 women, aged 25–75 years, 10 knees and 6 ankles). MR imaging findings of the bone marrow were analyzed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus regarding: diffuse or focal signal alteration, reinforcement of vertical or longitudinal trabecular lines, and presence of abnormal vascularization.
Results
All patients (100%,16/16) with DO presented MR imaging abnormalities of the bone marrow, such as: accentuation of vertical trabecular lines (50%, 8/16), presence of subchondral lobules of fat (37.5%, 6/16), presence of horizontal trabecular lines (31%, 5/16), prominence of bone vessels (25%, 4/16), and presence of dotted areas of high signal intensity on T2-weighted fat-suppressed sequences (12.5%, 2/16). Such MR findings did not appear in the control individuals.
Conclusion
There are several MR imaging findings in bones with DO that range from accentuation of vertical and horizontal marrow lines, presence of subchondral lobules of fat, prominent bone vascularization and the presence of dotted foci of high signal intensity on T2-weighted fat-suppressed sequences. Recognition of these signs may prove helpful in the identification of DO as well as distinguishing these findings from other entities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Resnick D. Regional osteoporosis. In: Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders, 4th edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. p. 1795–98.
Takata S, Yasui N. Disuse osteoporosis. J Med Investig. 2001;48(3–4):147–56.
Allman R, Brower A. Circulatory patterns of deossification. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19:553.
Jones G. Radiological appearances of disuse osteoporosis. Clin Radiol. 1969;20:345.
Joyce JM, Keats T. Disuse osteoporosis: mimic of neoplastic disease. Skeletal Radiol. 1986;15(2):129–32.
Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson RN, Schwartz E. Continuous loss of bone during chronic immobilization: a monozygotic twin study. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:123–7.
Finsen V, Benum P. Osteopenia after ankle fractures. The influence of early weight-bearing and muscle activity. Clin Orthop. 1989;245:261–8.
Anderson SM, Nisson BE. Changes in bone mineral content following tibial shaft fractures. Clin Orthop. 1979;144:226–9.
Schneider VS, McDonald J. Skeletal calcium homeostasis and countermeasures to prevent disuse osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984;36(Suppl 1):S151–4.
Majumdar S, Genant HK. A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1995;5(2):79–92.
Jaworski ZFG, Uhthoff HK. Reversibility of nontraumatic disuse osteoporosis during its active phase. Bone. 1986;7:431–9.
Ito M, Matsumoto T, Enomoto H, Tsurusaki K, Hayashi K. Effect of nonweight bearing on tibial bone density measured by QCT in patients with hip surgery. J Bone Miner Metab. 1999;17:45–50.
Kursunoglu S, Pate D, Resnick D, Haghighi P, Tyson R, Pitt M. Bone reinforcement lines in chronic adult osteopenia: a hypothesis. Radiology. 1986;158(2):409–15.
Nishida Y, Saito Y, Yokota T, Kanda T, Mizusawa H. Skeletal muscle MRI in complex regional pain syndrome. Intern Med. 2009;48(4):209–12.
Darbois H, Boyer B, Dubayle P, Lechevalier D, David H, Aït-Ameur A. MRI symptomology in reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the foot. J Radiol. 1999;80(8):849–54.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Abreu, M.R., Wesselly, M., Chung, C.B. et al. Bone marrow MR imaging findings in disuse osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol 40, 571–575 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-1042-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-1042-x