Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiation-induced pseudotumor following therapy for soft tissue sarcoma

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence and imaging appearance of radiation induced pseudotumors in patients following radiation therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the serial magnetic resonance (MR) images of 24 patients following radiation therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. A total of 208 exams were reviewed (mean, 8.7 exams per patient) and included all available studies following the start of radiation therapy. Exams were analyzed for the identification of focal signal abnormalities within the surgical bed suggesting local tumor recurrence. Histopathologic correlation was available in nine patients suspected of having local tumor recurrence. Additional information recorded included patient demographics, tumor type and location, radiation type, and dose.

Results

The study group consisted of 12 men and 12 women, having an average age of 63 years (range, 39–88 years). Primary tumors were malignant fibrous histiocytoma (n = 13), leiomyosarcoma (n = 6), liposarcoma (n = 3), synovial sarcoma (n = 1), and extraskeletal chondrosarcoma (n = 1). All lesions were high-grade sarcomas, except for two myxoid liposarcomas. Average patient radiation dose was 5,658 cGy (range, 4,500–8,040 cGy). Average follow-up time was 63 months (range, 3–204 months). Focal signal abnormalities suggesting local recurrence were seen in nine (38%) patients. Three of the nine patients with these signal abnormalities were surgically proven to have radiation-induced pseudotumor. The pseudotumors developed between 11 and 61 months following the initiation of radiation therapy (mean, 38 months), with an average radiation dose of 5,527 cGy (range, 5,040–6,500 cGy). MR imaging demonstrated a relatively ill-defined ovoid focus of abnormal signal and intense heterogeneous enhancement with little or no associated mass effect.

Conclusion

MR imaging of radiation-induced pseudotumor typically demonstrates a relatively ill-defined ovoid mass-like focus of intense heterogeneous enhancement with little or no associated mass effect. Imaging follow-up or biopsy may be an alternative course of action to surgical re-exploration if this diagnosis is considered. The study revealed radiation-induced pseudotumor in 12.5% of patients in our extremity study group, suggesting that radiation-induced pseudotumor may be more prevalent than previously reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Imaging of soft tissue tumors. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 38–79.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vanel D, Shapeero LG, Tardivon A, Western A, Guinebretiere JM. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with subtraction of aggressive soft tissue tumors after resection. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27(9): 505–510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanel D, Shapeero LG, De Baere T, Gilles R, Tardivon A, Genin J, et al. MR imaging in the follow-up of malignant and aggressive soft-tissue tumors: results of 511 examinations. Radiology 1994;190(1): 263–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Glazer HS, Lee JK, Levitt RG, Heiken JP, Ling D, Totty WG, et al. Radiation fibrosis: differentiation from recurrent tumor by MR imaging. Radiology 1985;156(3): 721–726.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebner F, Kressel HY, Mintz MC, Carlson JA, Cohen EK, Schiebler M, et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the female pelvis: differentiation with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988;166(2): 333–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Daldrup-Link HE, Henning T, Link TM. MR imaging of therapy-induced changes of bone marrow. Eur Radiol 2007;17(3): 743–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Budach V, Stuschke M, Budach W, Molls M, Sack H. Radiation response in 10 high-grade human soft tissue sarcoma xenografts to photons and fast neutrons. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990;19(4): 941–943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laramore GE, Griffith JT, Boespflug M, Pelton JG, Griffin T, Griffin BR, et al. Fast neutron radiotherapy for sarcomas of soft tissue, bone, and cartilage. Am J Clin Oncol 1989;12(4): 320–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Panicek DM, Schwartz LH, Heelan TT, Caravelli JF. Non-neoplastic causes of high signal intensity at T2-weighted MR imaging after treatment for musculoskeletal neoplasm. Skeletal Radiol 1995;24(3): 185–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang S, Lefkowitz R, Landa J, et al. Local changes in bone marrow at MRI after treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 2009;38(1): 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanel D, Lacombe MJ, Couanet D, Kalifa C, Spielmann M, Genin J. Musculoskeletal tumors: follow-up with MR imaging after treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. Radiology. 1987;164(1): 243–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark J. Kransdorf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, L.F., Kransdorf, M.J., Buskirk, S.J. et al. Radiation-induced pseudotumor following therapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 38, 579–584 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0653-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0653-6

Keywords

Navigation