Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterolateral ankle impingement: findings and diagnostic accuracy with ultrasound imaging

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to evaluate the findings and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in antero-lateral ankle impingement (ALI) with clinical and arthroscopic correlation.

Design and patients

Seventeen elite footballers with chronic ankle pain were referred for ultrasound with a clinical diagnosis of ALI (n = 8) or a control condition (n = 9; lateral mechanical instability, osteochondral defect, intra-articular bodies and osteoarthritis). Ultrasound examination included the antero-lateral gutter for abnormal synovial tissue (synovitic lesion), lateral ligament integrity, tibiotalar joint and osseous spurs of the distal tibia and talus. Ultrasound findings were correlated with subsequent arthroscopic appearance.

Results

Ultrasound examination detected a synovitic mass in the antero-lateral gutter in all 8 footballers with clinical ALI (100%) and in 2 patients with a control diagnosis (22%). Arthroscopic correlation of antero-lateral synovitis and fibrosis was present in all 10 cases (100%). The synovitic lesion was seen at ultrasound as a nodular soft tissue mass of mixed echogenicity within the antero-lateral gutter, which extruded anteriorly with manual compression of the distal fibula against the tibia. Increased blood supply was detected using power Doppler imaging in only 1 patient. The synovitic lesion measured >10 mm in its maximum dimension in 7 footballers with clinical ALI and <10 mm in the control group. Additional ultrasound findings in patients with abnormal antero-lateral synovial tissue included an anterior talofibular ligament injury in all patients (n = 10), a tibiotalar joint effusion (n = 6) and osseous spurs (n = 4). Antero-lateral synovitic tissue was accurately identified at ultrasound in the absence of an effusion (n = 4). No synovitic lesion was detected at ultrasound or arthroscopy in the remaining 7 patients with a control diagnosis.

Conclusion

Ultrasound is accurate in detecting synovitic lesions within the antero-lateral gutter, demonstrating associated ligamentous injuries and in differentiating soft tissue from osseous impingement. Synovitic lesions in two control patients suggest that abnormal antero-lateral soft tissue does not necessarily imply the presence of symptomatic ALI. Synovitic lesions in excess of 10 mm were associated with symptoms. Ultrasound will not demonstrate osteocartilaginous lesions or stress fractures and may overlook some loose bodies. Ultrasound findings together with clinical correlation can be used to direct arthroscopic examination and surgical debridement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson P, White LM, Salonen DC, Daniels TR, Ogilvie-Harris D. Anterolateral ankle impingement: MR arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral recess. Radiology 2001; 221: 186–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan LK, Helms CA, Cooperman AE, Speer KP. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in anterolateral impingement of the ankle. Skelet Radiol 2000; 29: 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubin DA, Tishkoff NW, Britton CA, Conti SF, Towers JD. Anterolateral soft tissue impingement in the ankle: diagnosis using MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 829–835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Farooki S, Yao L, Seeger LL. Anterolateral impingement of the ankle: effectiveness of MR imaging. Radiology 1998; 207: 357–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerezal L, Abascal F, Canga A, et al. MR imaging of ankle impingement syndromes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 551–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu SH, Nuccion SL, Finerman G. Diagnosis of anterolateral ankle impingement: comparison between MRI and clinical examination. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 389–393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim SH, Ha KI. Arthroscopic treatment for impingement of the anterolateral soft tissues of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 1019–1021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeBerardino TM, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Arthroscopic treatment of soft-tissue impingement of the ankle in athletes. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 492–498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu SH, Raskin A, Osti L et al. Arthroscopic treatment of anterolateral ankle impingement. Arthroscopy 1994; 10: 215–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagnolesi P, Zampa V, Carafoli D, Cilotti A, Bartolozzi C. Anterolateral fibrous impingement of the ankle. Report of 14 cases. Radiol Med (Torino) 1998; 95: 293–297.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Messiou C, Robinson P, O’Connor PJ, Grainger A. Subacute posteromedial impingement of the ankle in athletes: MR imaging evaluation and ultrasound guided therapy. Skelet Radiol 2006; 35: 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergin D, Schweitzer ME. Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography. Skelet Radiol 2003; 32: 551–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haller J, Bernt R, Seeger T, Weissenback A, Tuchler H, Resnick D. MR imaging of anterior tibiotalar impingement syndromes: agreement, sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging and indirect MR arthrography. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58: 450–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarthy, C.L., Wilson, D.J. & Coltman, T.P. Anterolateral ankle impingement: findings and diagnostic accuracy with ultrasound imaging. Skeletal Radiol 37, 209–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0411-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0411-6

Keywords

Navigation