Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of MR arthrography with arthroscopy of the hip for the assessment of intra-articular loose bodies

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the specificity and sensitivity of MR arthrography of the hip in comparison with arthroscopy for the evaluation of intra-articular loose bodies.

Design

Over a 3-year period, 81 consecutive patients underwent a total of 82 hip arthroscopies by a single orthopedic surgeon for intractable hip pain. Of the 82 arthroscopies, 70 had pre-operative MR arthrograms. Of these, 57 were available for retrospective review, after which they were compared with the operative notes of the subsequent arthroscopies.

Results

Of 82 arthroscopies 16 (20%) demonstrated intra-articular loose bodies, while, in the study group, nine of 57 had loose bodies (16%). There was a total of seven discordant cases (five false negatives and two false positives). The sensitivity of MR arthrography for detection of intra-articular loose bodies was 44%, while the specificity was 96%.

Conclusion

While the specificity of MR arthrography for the detection of intra-articular loose bodies was high (96%), the sensitivity was not nearly as good (44%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toomayan GA, Holman WR, Major NM, Kozlowicz SM, Vail TP. Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 449–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Petersilge C. Imaging of the acetabular labrum. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13: 641–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Newberg AH, Newman JS. Imaging the painful hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 406: 19–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersilge CA. MR arthrography for evaluation of the acetabular labrum. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30: 423–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blankenbaker DG, Tuite MJ. The painful hip: new concepts. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35: 352–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krebs VE. The role of hip arthroscopy in the treatment of synovial disorders and loose bodies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 406: 48–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Milgram JW. The classification of loose bodies in human joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 124: 282–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Milgram JW. The development of loose bodies in human joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 124: 292–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rai NN, Siney PD, Fleming PA, Wroblewski BM. Incidence of loose bodies in an osteoarthritic hip. J R Coll Surg Edinb 2001; 46: 274–276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brosman J, Priedler KW, Daenen B, et al. Imaging of osseous and cartilaginous intraarticular bodies in the knee: comparison of MR imaging and MR arthrography with CT and CT arthrography in cadavers. Radiology 1996; 200: 509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankel DA, Bargiela A, Bouffard JA, et al. Synovial joints: evaluation of intraarticular bodies with US. Radiology 1998; 206: 41–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillis A, Gray M, Burstein D. Relaxivity and diffusion of gadolinium agents in cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 1068–1071.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew C. Neckers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neckers, A.C., Polster, J.M., Winalski, C.S. et al. Comparison of MR arthrography with arthroscopy of the hip for the assessment of intra-articular loose bodies. Skeletal Radiol 36, 963–967 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0331-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0331-5

Keywords

Navigation