Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vivo evaluation of early disease progression by X-ray phase-contrast imaging in the adjuvant-induced arthritic rat

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the early change of bone matrix and soft tissue around articulation in adjuvant-induced arthritic (AIA) rats non-invasively by X-ray phase-contrast imaging (XPCI), a new imaging method.

Materials and methods

Adjuvant-induced arthritis was established in male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (n=6, age 40 days) by subcutaneous injection of Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) into the left hindpaw. In vivo XPCI evaluation of the early soft tissue and bone changes in AIA rats was consecutively performed and correlated with changes in volumes of right hindpaws and body weights. In comparison, the changes in the AIA rats were also evaluated with absorption-contrast imaging using the same X-ray source as XPCI and conventional radiography at the same time. After the imaging evaluation, AIA rats were subjected to histological examination.

Results

There was significant difference between the score of XPCI and the other two methods in demonstrating soft tissue (P<0.01), bone details (P<0.01) and lesions (P<0.001). By day 10 after subcutaneous injection of FCA, bone changes in the right hindpaw were not obvious, but swelling of soft tissue appeared. By day 12, bone erosion in the articular facet and the area around the articular facet, was detected, along with osteoporosis, and swelling of soft tissue was aggravated. By day 14 bone erosions became fused and expanded, especially in the margin area around the articular facet. At day 16 bone erosion still existed. Joint interspaces seemed wider than normal, and swelling of soft tissue was significant. By day 18 periosteal new bone formation was seen definitely, destruction of bone decreased, bone density around the articular was enhanced, and swelling of soft tissue was relieved. XPCI could clearly distinguish all these alterations, which could not be demonstrated by absorption-contrast imaging and conventional radiography. During the test period, the volume of the right hindpaw and the body weight of the AIA rats also changed significantly compared with the normal rat. Histological examination confirmed that adjuvant-induced arthritis had occurred in all rats of the adjuvant group.

Conclusion

Osteoporosis, bone erosion and periosteal new bone formation take place at the early stage of adjuvant-induced arthritis. XPCI can evaluate non-invasively these subtle bone changes that are “blind areas” for conventional radiography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koch AE. Angiogenesis: implications for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:951–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuno H, Yudoh K, Morita I. Apoptosis is a novel therapeutic strategy for RA: investigations using an experimental arthritis animal model. Mech Loading Bone Joints 1999;34:215–26

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalden JR, Sieper J. Oral collagen in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:191–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, et al. New radiographic bone erosions in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are detectable with magnetic resonance imaging a median of two years earlier. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2128–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gylys-Morin VM, Graham TB, Blebea JS, et al. Knee in early juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: MR imaging findings. Radiology 2001;220:696–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkins SW, Gureyev TE, Gao D, et al. Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X rays. Nature 1996;384:335–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Menk RH. Interference imaging and its application to material and medical imaging. Nucl Phys B (Proc Suppl) 1999;78:604–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gureyev TE, Stevenson AW, Paganin D, et al. Quantitative methods in phase-contrast X-ray imaging. J Digit Imaging 2000;13:121–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baruchel J, Lodini A, Romanzetti S, et al. Phase-contrast imaging of thin biomaterials. Biomaterials 2001;22:1515–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Takeda T, Momose A, Hirano K, et al. Human carcinoma: early experience with phase-contrast X-ray CT with synchrotron radiation—comparative specimen study with optical microscopy. Radiology 2000;214:298–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cloetens P, Pateyron-Salome M, Buffiere JY, et al. Observation of microstructure and damage in materials by phase sensitive radiography and tomography. J Appl Phys 1997;81:5878–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Sandrock D, et al. Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:895–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, et al. Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1232–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobson PB, Borgan SJ, Wilcox DM, et al. A new spin on an old model: in vivo evaluation of disease progression by magnetic resonance imaging with respect to standard inflammatory parameters and histopathology in the adjuvant arthritic rat. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:2060–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones RS, Ward JR. Studies on adjuvant-induced polyarthritis in rats. II. Histogenesis of joint and visceral lesions. Arthritis Rheum 1963;6:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. König H, Sieper J, Wolf KJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1990;176:473–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Østergaard M, Lorenzen I, Henriksen O. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in active and inactive immunoinflammatory gonarthritis. Acta Radiol 1994;35:275–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamato M, Tamai K, Yamaguchi T, Ohno W. MRI of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis: Gd-DTPA perfusion dynamics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:781–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongqiang Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Xiong, Z., Lv, Y. et al. In vivo evaluation of early disease progression by X-ray phase-contrast imaging in the adjuvant-induced arthritic rat. Skeletal Radiol 35, 156–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0026-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0026-8

Keywords

Navigation