Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of technical conditions of X-ray imaging on reproducibility and precision of digital computer-assisted X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR)

  • Newer Technology
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the reproducibility of imaging and analysis for bone mineral density (BMD) determination using digital computer-assisted X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR; Pronosco X-posure, version V.2, Sectra Pronosco, Denmark); to verify potential factors that influence BMD extrapolation such as tube voltage, film-focus distance (FFD), film quality and brand (Kodak T-MAT-Plus, Konika SRH, Agfa Scopix), imaging technology (conventional, digital), imaging system (Kodak, Agfa) and exposure level (mAs); and to clarify whether DXR analysis based on printouts of digital images is comparable to analysis of conventional images.

Design and patients

The hand of a cadaver was X-rayed using varied parameters: 4–8 mAs, 40–52 kV, 90–130 cm FFD. Radiographs under standardised conditions were performed 10 times using a conventional machine (Philips Super 80 CP) and the printouts of a digital system (Digital Diagnost Philips Optimus) for the analysis of reproducibility. One image was scanned and analysed 10 times additionally for imaging reproducibility.

Results

Reliability error of the system for the imaging process using conventional radiographs-rays was 0.49% (standard conditions: 6 mAs, 40 kV, 1 m FFD), using printouts of digital images was 2.89% (4 mAs, 42 kV, 1 m FFD) and regarding the analysis process was 0.22%. BMD calculation is not affected by alterations in FFD (precision error 1.21%), mAs (0.83%) or film quality/brand (0.38%), but differs significantly depending on tube voltage (2.70%). The system was not able to analyse conventional images with tube voltages of 49/52 kV.

Conclusion

DXR technology is stable with most of the tested parameters. Normative data should exclusively be used for calculations using similar tube voltage or correction factors. All other parameters had no significant influence on the BMD calculation. Reproducibility is high. For technical reasons it is not recommended to use the printouts of digital images for BMD determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnett E, Nordin B. The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 1960; 11:166–174.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Virtama P, Mahonen H. Thickness of the cortical layer as an estimate of mineral content of human finger bones. Br J Radiol 1960; 6:60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wishart JM, Horowitz M, Bochner M, Need AG, Nordin BEC. Relationship between metacarpal morphometry, forearm and vertebral bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:435–440.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosholm A, Hylsdrup L, Baeksgaard L, Grunkin M, Thodberg HH. Estimation of bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry: theoretical background and clinical testing. Osteoporosis Int 2001; 12:961–969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardin DS, Sy JP. Effects of growth hormone treatment in children with cystic fibrosis: the National Cooperative Growth Study experience. J Pediatr 1997; 131:65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black DM, Palermo L, Sorensen T, et al. A normative reference database study for the Pronosco X-posure radiogrammetry system. J Clin Densitom 2001; 4:5-12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anon. EXPO/DK-04: a clinical study to establish a normative reference database for the Pronosco X-posure system for Scandinavian Caucasian women. Clinical report V.2 20-11-2000

  8. Wüster C, Wenzler M, Kappes J, Rehm C, Gühring T, Arnbjerg C. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry as a clinical method for estimating bone mineral density: a German reference database. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15:298.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maffei L, Venarotti H, Treviso J, Sorensen TK, Nissen D. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a Hispanic normative reference database for the Pronosco X-posure system. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15:304.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yan J, Li M, Zhonhou L, et al. Normal values of forearm bone BMD and incidence of primary osteoporosis in Chinese women. Chinese J Osteoporos 2000; 6:30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anon. XPO/TECH-016: reproducibility study for X-posure V.2: conventional image capture. Technical report 24-7-2000.

  12. Malich A, Azhari T, Boehm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Reproducibility of a commercially available computer aided detection (CAD) system. Eur J Radiol 2000; 36:170–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glastre C, Braillon P, David L, Cochat P, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Measurement of bone mineral content of the lumbar spine by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal children: correlations with growth parameters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 70:1330–1333.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, Genant HK. Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isot 1999; 50:215–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wünsche K, Wünsche B, Fähnrich H, et al. Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 2000; 67:349–355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malich A, Mainz J, John S, Böttcher K, Vogt S, Kaiser WA. Ultrasound based bone densitometry of the os calcis measured on asthmatic children using regional normative data. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(Suppl 1):284.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Helboe AB, Juul K, Rosholm A, Andersen PB, Bjarnason NH. High short-term in-vivo precision of the Pronosco X-posure System on hand X-rays. J Bone Miner Soc 2001; 28(Suppl):335.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malich A, Freesmeyer MG, Mentzel HJ, et al. Normative values of bone parameters of children and adolescents using digital computer-assisted radiogrammetry (DXR). J Clin Densitom 2003; 6:103–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Felsenberg D, Gowin W, Diessel E, Armbrust S, Mews J. Recent developments in DXA. Quality of new DXA/MXA-devices to densitometry and morphometry. Eur J Radiol 1995; 20:179–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boonen S, Cheng X, Nicholson PH, Verbeke G, Broos P, Dequeker J. The accuracy of peripheral skeletal assessment at the radius in estimating femoral bone density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a comparative study of single-photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. J Intern Med 1997; 242:323–328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nordin BEC. Calcium, phosphate and magnesium metabolism. In: Clinical physiology and diagnostic procedures. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1976:391–397, 512–516, 570–572.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Bachstrasse 18, 07740, Jena, Germany

    A. Malich, J. Boettcher, A. Pfeil, D. Sauner, J. P. Heyne, A. Petrovitch, A. Hansch & W. A. Kaiser

  2. Institute of Anatomy I, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Bachstrasse 18, 07740, Jena, Germany

    W. Linss

Authors
  1. A. Malich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Boettcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Pfeil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Sauner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. P. Heyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Petrovitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Hansch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. W. Linss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. W. A. Kaiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Malich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malich, A., Boettcher, J., Pfeil, A. et al. The impact of technical conditions of X-ray imaging on reproducibility and precision of digital computer-assisted X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR). Skeletal Radiol 33, 698–703 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0861-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0861-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation