Abstract
Objective
To compare MR images of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) using microscopy coils with those using a conventional surface coil qualitatively and quantitatively.
Design and patients
Proton density-weighted images and T2*-weighted images of the TFCC from ten normal volunteers were obtained with a conventional surface coil (C4 coil; 80 mm in diameter), a 47-mm microscopy surface coil and a 23-mm microscopy surface coil) at 1.5 T. Qualitative image analysis of MR images with three coils was performed by two radiologists who assigned one of five numerical scores (0, nonvisualization; 1, poor; 2, average; 3, good; 4, excellent) for five TFCC components, which were disc proper, triangular ligament, meniscus homologue, ulnotriquetral and ulnolunate ligament. Quantitative analysis included the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the disc proper of TFCC, the lunate cartilage, the lunate bone and the contrast-noise-ratio (C/N) between articular cartilage and disc proper or bone marrow were measured.
Results
All structures show higher scores qualitatively on MR with microscopy coils than those with a C4 coil, and the difference was significant with the exception of the ulnolunate ligament. MR with microscopy coils showed significantly higher S/N values than those with a conventional surface coil (P<0.05 to P<0.001). T2*-weighted images using microscopy coils showed significantly higher cartilage-disc proper C/N and cartilage-bone marrow C/N (P<0.01 to P<0.001). On proton density-weighted images, the C/N between cartilage and disc proper with two microscopy coils was significantly higher (P<0.01) than that with a conventional coil.
Conclusion
High-resolution MR images of the normal wrist using microscopy coils were superior to those using a conventional surface coil qualitatively and quantitatively. High-resolution MR imaging with a microscopy coil would be a promising method to diagnose TFCC lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Timins ME, O'Connell SE, Erickson SJ, Oneson SR (1996) MR imaging of the wrist: normal findings that may simulate disease. Radiographics 16:987–995
Totterman SMS, Miller R, Wasserman B, Blebea JS, Rubens DJ (1993) Intrinsic and extrinsic carpal ligaments: evaluation by three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. AJR 160:117–123
Horton MG, Timins ME (1997) MR imaging of injuries to small joints. Radiol Clin North Am 3:671–700
Imaeda T, Nakamura R, Shinoyama K, Makino N (1996) Ulnar impaction syndrome: MR imaging findings. Radiology 201:495–500
Ashman CJ, Farooki S, Abduljalil AM, Chakeres DW (2002) In vivo high-resolution coronal MRI of the wrist at 8.0 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:387–391
Lewis AR, Noran MJ, Hodgson RJ et al (1996) High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal interphalangeal joints. Correlation with histology and production of a three-dimensional data set. J Hand Surg Br 21:288–495
Nakamura T, Makita A (2000) The proximal ligamentous component of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Functional anatomy and three-dimensional changes in length of the radioulnar ligament during pronation and supination. J Hand Surg Br 25:479–486
Totterman SMS, Miller RJ (1995) Triangular fibrocartilage complex: normal appearance on coronal three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo MR images. Radiology 195:521–527
Totterman SMS, Miller RJ, McCance SE, Meyers SP (1996) Lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex: MR findings with a three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo sequence. Radiology 199:227–232
Oneson SR, Timins ME, Scales LM, Erickson SJ, Chamoy L (1997) MR imaging diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage pathology with arthroscopic correlation. AJR 168:1513–1518
Potter HG, Anis-Ernberg L, Weiland AJ, Hotchkiss RN, Peterson MGE, McCormack RR Jr (1997) The utility of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1675–1684
Schweitzer ME, Brahme SK, Holdler J, et al (1992) Chronic wrist pain: spin-echo and short tau inversion recovery MR imaging and conventional and MR arthrography. Radiology 182:205–211
Oneson SR, Scales LM, Timins ME, Erickson SJ, Chamoy L (1996) MR imaging interpretation of the Palmer classification of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions. Radiographics 16:97–106
Morley J, Bidwell J, Bransby-Zachary M (2001) A comparison of the findings of wrist arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in the investigation of wrist pain. J Hand Surg Br 26:544–546
Haims AH, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, et al (2002) Limitations of MR imaging in the diagnosis of peripheral tears of the triangular fibrocartilage of the wrist. AJR 178:419–422
Kato H, Nakamura R, Shionoya K, Makino N, Imaeda T (2000) Does high-resolution MR imaging have better accuracy than standard MR imaging for evaluation of the triangular fibrocartilage complex? J Hand Surg Br 25:487–491
Shinoyama K, Nakamura R, Imaeda T, Makino N (1998) Arthrography is superior to magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage. J Hand Surg Br 23:402-405
Johnstone DJ, Thorogood S, Smith WH, Scott TD (1997) A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the investigation of chronic wrist pain. J Hand Surg Br 22:714–718
Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Takayama S, Makita A (1998) Dynamic changes of the triangular fibrocartilage complex during rotation—an experimental study using high-resolution MRI. J Jpn Soc Surg Hand 14:907–912
Yoshioka H, Kujiraoka Y, Ueno T, Tanaka T, Mishima H, Itai Y (2002) High-resolution MR imaging of the hand and wrist using a microscopy surface coil at clinical 1.5 T MR machine. Radiology [Suppl] 225:734
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshioka, H., Ueno, T., Tanaka, T. et al. High-resolution MR imaging of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC): comparison of microscopy coils and a conventional small surface coil. Skeletal Radiol 32, 575–581 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-003-0672-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-003-0672-7