Skip to main content
Log in

Biodegradation effects over different types of coastal rocks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Modern coastal areas have natural and transported rocks (armourstone) on which various types of organisms live. Burrowing, boring and feeding by these organisms can destroy or modify the coastal rocks and hence change the coastal morphology. Two rock types and three dominant types of organisms have been studied in Mersin Bay, Eastern Mediterranean of southern Turkey. In this study area, Plio-Quaternary conglomerates and variously aged limestone armourplates have been affected by Phoronida worms, bivalve Brachidontes pharaonis (Fischer P. 1870) and the limpet Patella sp. Phoronida colonies were found covering the hard substratum as a mat and form tubular endolithes of 35.0 mm depth and 1.5 mm diameter, whilst Brachidontes pharaonis (Fischer P. 1870) form 44 mm deep vase-shaped gastrochaenolites. The bioerosive activity of Limpet Patella sp., found intertidal and within the spray zone, cannot be significantly observed on the rocks over short time periods. The soft sandy matrix of the conglomerates present were found to disintegrate by bioerosional processes, with the released gravels being transported and deposited onto the beach. Within the armourstone limestone blocks, a maximum of 44.0 mm deep holes developed after 50–60 years. However, these biological activities do not threaten the stability of the blocks due to their hard and homogeneous internal structure. Furthermore, the organism colonies that cover these rocks as a strong mat (maximum 29.0 mm) act to protect their surfaces from further biological attack and wave action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews C, Williams RBG (2000) Limpet erosion of chalk shore platforms in southeast England. Earth Surf Process Landf 25–12:1371–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babic L, Zupanic J (2000) Borings in mobile clasts from Eocene conglomerates of northern Dalmatia (Coastal Dinarides, Croatia). Facies 42:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrano C, Bavestrello G, Calcinai B, Cattaneo-Vietti R, Chiantore M, Guidetti M, Sara A (2001) Bioerosive processes in Antarctic seas (short note). Polar Biol 24:790–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies JL (1973) Geographical variation in coastal development. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirtaşlı E, Turhan N, Bilgin AZ, Selim M (1984) Geology of the Bolkar Mountains. In: International symposium on the geology of the Taurus Belt, Ankara, pp 125–141

  • DSİ (1978) Hydrogeological investigation report of Mersin-Berdan and Efrenk Plains. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, p 60 (unpublished, in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham RJ (1962) Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham WG (ed) Classification of carbonate rocks. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Mem 1:108–121

  • Ekdale AA, Bromley RG (2001) Bioerosional innovation for living in carbonate hardgrounds in the Early Ordovician of Sweden. Lethaia 34:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emig CC, De Mittelwihr C (1999) What is a Phoronid? http://paleopolis.rediris.es/Phoronida/WHAT/EPho.htm. Accessed 20 March 2007

  • Eren M, Kadir S, Hatipoğlu Z, Gül M (2004) Caliche development in Mersin region. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Research Project No: YDABAG-102Y036, p 55 (unpublished, in Turkish with English abstract)

  • Erentöz C, Ternek Z (1962) 1/500.000 scaled general geological map of the Adana region. MTA (Institute of Mineral Research and Exploration), Ankara. http://www.mta.gov.tr/mta_web/500.000/image/adana.asp. Accessed 24 April 2007

  • Ergen Z, Öztürk B (1999) Patella species (Archaeogastropoda) distributed in Saros Bay (Northeast Aegean Sea). Turk J Zool 23–2:513–519 (in Turkish with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk RL (1962) Spectral subdivisions of limestone types. In: Ham WG (ed) Classification of carbonate rocks. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Mem 1:62–84

  • Guidetti P, Fraschetti S, Terlizzi A, Boero F (2003) Distribution patterns of sea urchins and barrens in shallow Mediterranean rocky reefs impacted by the illegal fishery of the rock-boring mollusc Lithophaga lithophaga. Marine Biol 143:1135–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürbüz K (1999) Regional implications of structural and eustatic controls in the evolution of submarine fans: an example from the Miocene Adana Basin, Southern Turkey. Geol Mag 136–3:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İşler F (1990) Geology of the ophiolite in the Fındıkpınarı (Mersin). Cumhuriyet University. J Eng, Series A, Geosound 6–7(1–2):45–53 (in Turkish with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karayakar F (2005) Seasonal changes in levels of heavy metal, total protein and MDA together with some enzymes activities in Brachidontes Pharanois. Çukurova University, Institute of Basic and Applied Science, Adana,Turkey, p 80 (unpublished PhD Thesis, in Turkish with English abstract)

  • Kleeman K (2001) Marine bioerosion. University of Vienna, lecture notes, pp 1–28. http://www.sbg.ac.at/ipk/avstudio/pierofun/funpage.htm. Accessed on 15 December 2006

  • Özer E, Koç H, Özsayar T (2004) Stratigraphical evidence for the depression of the northern margin of the Menderes-Tauride block (Turkey) during the Late Cretaceous. J Asian Earth Sci 22:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özgül N (1976) Some basic geologic properties of the Taurides. Geol Bull Turk 19:65–79 (in Turkish with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlak O, Delaloye M (1996) Geochemistry and timing of post-metamorphic dyke emplacement in the Mersin Ophiolite (southern Turkey): New age constraints from 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. Terranova 8:585–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Safriel UN, Gilboa A, Felsemburg T (1980) Distribution of rocky intertidal mussels in the Red Sea coasts of Sinai, the Suez Canal and the Mediterranean coast of Israel with special references to recent colonisers. J Biogeogr 7:39–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin Ş, Böke N, Yalçın N, Mengeloğlu MK (2003) The geologic properties of the İçel Province. General Directorate of Mineral and Exploration Institute, Eastern Mediterranean District Office (Adana, South Turkey), research project, p 18 (unpublished, in Turkish)

  • Şenol M, Şahin Ş, Duman T, Albayrak Ş, Akça İ, Taşkın Ş (1998) The geological investigation report of Adana-Mersin region. General Directorate of Mineral and Exploration Institute, Eastern Mediterranean District Office (Adana, South Turkey), research project, p 46 (unpublished, in Turkish)

  • Taylor PD, Wilson MA (2003) Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth Sci Rev 62:1–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill ST, Viles HA (1998) Field and laboratory approaches to limestone weathering. Q J Eng Geol 31:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ünlügenç UC, Kelling G, Demirkol C (1990) Aspects of basin evolution in the Neogene Adana Basin, SE Turkey. In Savaşçın MY, Eronat AH (eds) Proceedings of the international earth science congress on Aegean Region, İzmir, vol 1, pp 353–370

  • Wilson MA (2006) Bioerosion. Department of Geology, The College of Wooster. http://www.wooster.edu/geology/Bioerosion/Bioerosion.html. Accessed 18 December 2006

  • Yetiş C, Demirkol C (1986) Detailed geologic investigation of the western side of the Adana Basin. General Directorate of Mineral and Exploration Institute Report No: 8037–8037a, p 70 (unpublished, in Turkish)

  • Young ME, Urguhart DCM (1998) Algal growth on building sandstones: effects of chemical stone cleaning methods. Q J Eng Geol 31:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth google. http://www.earth.google.com. Accessed 27 April 2007

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors warmly thank Luke Mortimer (Centre for Groundwater Studies, Flinders University, Australia) and Dr. Schwarzbauer (Aachen University, Germany) for their editorial reviews of the manuscript. The authors also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their critical scientific review of an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Gül.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gül, M., Özbek, A., Karayakar, F. et al. Biodegradation effects over different types of coastal rocks. Environ Geol 55, 1601–1611 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-1110-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-1110-2

Keywords

Navigation