Skip to main content
Log in

Identification, prediction, and mitigation of sinkhole hazards in evaporite karst areas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Sinkholes usually have a higher probability of occurrence and a greater genetic diversity in evaporite terrains than in carbonate karst areas. This is because evaporites have a higher solubility and, commonly, a lower mechanical strength. Subsidence damage resulting from evaporite dissolution generates substantial losses throughout the world, but the causes are only well understood in a few areas. To deal with these hazards, a phased approach is needed for sinkhole identification, investigation, prediction, and mitigation. Identification techniques include field surveys and geomorphological mapping combined with accounts from local people and historical sources. Detailed sinkhole maps can be constructed from sequential historical maps, recent topographical maps, and digital elevation models (DEMs) complemented with building-damage surveying, remote sensing, and high-resolution geodetic surveys. On a more detailed level, information from exposed paleosubsidence features (paleokarst), speleological explorations, geophysical investigations, trenching, dating techniques, and boreholes may help in investigating dissolution and subsidence features. Information on the hydrogeological pathways including caves, springs, and swallow holes are particularly important especially when corroborated by tracer tests. These diverse data sources make a valuable database—the karst inventory. From this dataset, sinkhole susceptibility zonations (relative probability) may be produced based on the spatial distribution of the features and good knowledge of the local geology. Sinkhole distribution can be investigated by spatial distribution analysis techniques including studies of preferential elongation, alignment, and nearest neighbor analysis. More objective susceptibility models may be obtained by analyzing the statistical relationships between the known sinkholes and the conditioning factors. Chronological information on sinkhole formation is required to estimate the probability of occurrence of sinkholes (number of sinkholes/km2 year). Such spatial and temporal predictions, frequently derived from limited records and based on the assumption that past sinkhole activity may be extrapolated to the future, are non-corroborated hypotheses. Validation methods allow us to assess the predictive capability of the susceptibility maps and to transform them into probability maps. Avoiding the most hazardous areas by preventive planning is the safest strategy for development in sinkhole-prone areas. Corrective measures could be applied to reduce the dissolution activity and subsidence processes. A more practical solution for safe development is to reduce the vulnerability of the structures by using subsidence-proof designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Fares RA (2005) The utility of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) Interferometry in monitoring sinkhole subsidence: subsidence of the devil’s throat sinkhole area (Nevada, USA). In: Beck BF (ed) Sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia pp 541–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson NL, Hinds RC (1997) Glacial loading and unloading: a possible cause of rock salt dissolution in the Western Canada Basin. Carbonates Evaporites 12(1):43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejchuk V, Klimchouk A (2002) Mechanisms of karst breakdown formation in the gypsum karst of the fore-Ural region, Russia (from observations in the Kungurskaja Cave). Int J Speleol 31:89–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer G, Schattner U, Wachs D, Sandwell D, Wdowinsli S, Frydman S (2002) The lowest place on earth is subsiding. An InSAR (interferometric synthetic aperture radar) perspective. Geol Soc Am Bull 114:12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck BF (1991) On calculating the risk of sinkhole collapse. In: Appalachian karst Kastning EH, Kastning KM (eds) Proceedings of the Appalachian karst symposium. National Speleological Society, Radford, VA, USA, pp 231–236

  • Beck BF (2004) Soil piping and sinkhole failures. In: White WB (ed) Enyclopedia of caves. Elsevier, New York, pp 523–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Benito G, Gutiérrez F, Pérez-González A, Machado MJ (2000) Morpho-sedimentological features in quaternary fluvial systems affected by solution-induced subsidence in the Ebro Basin, NE Spain. Geomorphology 33:209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC, Kaufmann RD (2001) Characterization of a highway sinkhole within the gypsum karst of Michigan. In: Beck BF, Herring JG (eds) Geotechnical and environmental applications of Karst geology and hydrology. Balkema, Lisse, pp 103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezuidenhout CA, Enslin JF (1970) Surface subsidence and sinkholes in the dolomitic areas of the Far West Rand, Transvaal, Republic of South Africa. Land Subsidence. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication 89, pp 482–495

  • Buskirk ED, Pavelk MD, Strasz R (1999) Education about and management of sinkholes in karst areas: initial efforts in Lebanon. In: Beck BF (ed) Hydrogeology and engineering geology of sinkholes and karst. Proceedings of the 7th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of Karst. Harrisburg/Hershey, Pennsylvania, April 10–14, 1999. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 263–266

  • Cater F (1970) Geology of the salt anticline region in southwestern Colorado. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 637, p 80

  • Cendrero A (2003) De la comprensión de la historia de la Tierra al análisis y predicción de las interacciones entre seres humanos y medio natural. Discurso de recepción. Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Madrid, p 60

  • Christiansen EA (1967) Collapse structures near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Can J Earth Sci 4:757–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AH (1986) Foundered strata and subsidence resulting from the dissolution of Permian gypsum in the Ripon and Bedale areas, North Yorkshire. In: Harwood GM, Smith DB (eds) The English Zechstein and related topics. Geological Society of London, Bath No. 22, pp 127–139

  • Cooper AH (1989) Airborne multispectral scanning of subsidence caused by Permian gypsum dissolution at Ripon, North Yorkshire. Q J Eng Geol 22:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AH (1998) Subsidence hazards caused by the dissolution of Permian gypsum in England: geology, investigation and remediation. In: Maund JG, Eddleston M (eds) Geohazards in engineering geology. Geological Society. Engineering Geology Special Publication 15, London, pp 265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AH (2002) Halite karst geohazards (natural and man-made) in the United Kingdom. Environ Geol 42:505–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AH (2008) The GIS approach to evaporite-karst geohazards in Great Britain. Environ Geol (this issue)

  • Cooper AH, Farrant AR, Adlam KAM, Walsby JC (2001) The development of a national geographic information system (GIS) for British karst geohazards and risk assessment. In Beck BF, Herring JG (eds) Geotechnical and environmental applications of karst geology and hydrogeology. Proceedings of the 8th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of Karst, April 1–4th Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Rotterdam, pp 125–130

  • Cooper AH, Calow RC (1998) Avoiding gypsum geohazards: guidance for planning and construction. British Geological Survey Technical Report WC/98/5, p 57. http://www.bgs.ac.uk/dfid-kar-geoscience/database/reports/colour/WC98005_COL.pdf

  • Cooper AH, Saunders JM (2002) Road and bridge construction across gypsum karst in England. Eng Geol 65:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AH, Waltham AC (1999) Subsidence caused by gypsum dissolution at Ripon, North Yorkshire. Q J Eng Geol 32:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides. Investigation and mitigation. Transportation research board. Natl Res Counc spec rep 247:36–75

  • Doelling HH (2000) Geology of arches national park, Grand County, Utah. In: Sprinkel DA, Chidsey TC, Anderson PB (eds) Geology of Utah’s parks and Monuments, vol 28, Utah Geological Association Publication, Salt Lake City, pp 11–36

  • Eraso A, Trzhtsinskij Y, Castrillo A (1995) Dolinas de colapso y karst en yeso en la plataforma cámbrica del este de Siberia. Boletín Geológico y Minero 106:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford DC (1997) Principal features of evaporite karst in Canada. Carbonates Evaporites 12(1):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford DC, Williams P (1989) Karst geomorphology and hydrology. Unwin Hyman, London, p 601

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin A, Raz E (2001) Collapse and subsidence associated with salt karstification along the Dead Sea. Carbonates Evaporites 16(2):117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galve JP, Bonachea J, Remondo J, Gutiérrez F, Guerrero J, Lucha P, Cendrero A, Gutiérrez M, Sánchez JA (2006) Development and validation of sinkhole susceptibility models in mantled karst settings. A case study from the Ebro valley evaporite karst (NE Spain). Eng Geol (in press)

  • Guerrero J, Gutiérrez F, Lucha P (2004) Paleosubsidence and active subsidence due to evaporite dissolution in the Zaragoza city area (Huerva River valley, NE Spain). Processes, spatial distribution and protection measures for linear infrastructures. Eng Geol 72:309–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero J, Gutiérrez F, Lucha P (2007) The impact of halite dissolution subsidence on fluvial terrace development. The case study of the Huerva River in the Ebro Basin (NE Spain). Geomorphology (in press)

  • Gustavson TC (1986) Geomorphic development of the Canadian River Valley, Texas Panhandle: an example of regional salt dissolution and subsidence. Geol Soc Am Bull 97:459–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez F (1996) Gypsum karstification induced subsidence: effects on alluvial systems and derived geohazards (Calatayud Graben, Iberian Range, Spain). Geomorphology 16:277–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez F (1998) Fenómenos de subsidencia por disolución de formaciones evaporíticas en las fosas neógenas de Teruel y Calatayud (Cordillera Ibérica). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Zaragoza, p 569

  • Gutiérrez F (2004) Origin of the salt valleys in the Canyon Lands section of the Colorado Plateau. Evaporite dissolution collapse versus tectonic subsidence Geomorphology 57:423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez F, Cooper AH (2002) Evaporite dissolution subsidence in the historical city of Calatayud, Spain: damage appraisal and prevention. Nat Hazards 25:259–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez F, Desir G, Gutiérrez M (2002) Causes of the catastrophic failure of an earth dam built on gypsiferous alluvium and dispersive clays (Altorricón, Huesca Province, NE Spain). Environ Geol 43(7):842–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez F, Lucha P, Guerrero J (2004) La dolina de colapso de la casa azul de Calatayud (noviembre de 2003) Origen, efectos y pronóstico In: Benito G, Díez-Herrero A (eds) Riesgos naturales y antrópicos en Geomorfología, VII Reunión Nacional de Geomorfología, Toledo, pp 477–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Santolalla F, Acosta E, Ríos S, Guerrero J, Lucha P (2005a) Geomorphology and geoarcheology of sackung features (uphill-facing scarps) in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Geomorphology 69:298–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Santolalla F, Gutiérrez-Elorza M, Marín C, Desir G, Maldonado C (2005b) Spatial distribution, morphometry and activity of La Puebla de Alfindén sinkhole field in the Ebro river valley (NE Spain). Applied aspects for hazard zonation. Environ Geol 48:360–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez F, Galve JP, Guerrero J, Lucha P, Cendrero A, Remondo J, Bonachea J, Gutiérrez M, Sánchez JA (2007a) Typology, spatial distribution, origin and detrimental effects of the sinkholes developed in the alluvial evaporite karst of the Ebro River valley downstream Zaragoza city (NE Spain). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms (in press)

  • Gutiérrez F, Guerrero J, Lucha P (2007b) Quantitative sinkhole hazard assessment. A case study from the Ebro Valley evaporite alluvial karst (NE Spain). Natural Hazards (in press)

  • Gutiérrez F, Calaforra JM, Cardona F, Ortí F, Duran JJ, Garay P (2006c) Geological and environmental implications of evaportie karst in Spain. Environ Geol (this issue)

  • Gutiérrez F, Guerrero J, Lucha P (2008b) A genetic classification of sinkholes illustrated from evaportie paleokarst exposures in Spain. Environ Geol (this issue)

  • Gutiérrez M, Gutiérrez F (1998) Geomorphology of the Tertiary gypsum formations in the Ebro depression (Spain). Geoderma 87:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill C (1996) Geology of the Delaware basin, Guadalupe, Apache, and Glass Mountains, New Mexico and West Texas. Permian Basin Section-SEPM, Publication 96–39, p 440

  • Hill C (2003) Intrastratal karst at the waste isolation pilot plant site, southeastern New Mexico. In: Johnson KS, Neal JT (eds) Evaporite karst and engineering/environmental problems in the United States, vol 109, Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular, Norman, Oklahoma, pp 197–209

  • Hoover RA (2003) Geophysical choices for karst investigations. In: Beck BF (ed) Sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 529–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt J, Wilkes H, Jacobs P (1999) Spatial relationship between new and old sinkholes in covered karst, Albany, Georgia, USA. In: Beck BF, Pettit AJ, Herring JG (eds) Hydrogeology and engineering geology of Sinkholes and Karst- 1999. Proceedings of the 7th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of Karst. Harrisburg/Hershey, Pennsylvania, April 10–14, 1999. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 37–44

  • Jeschke AA, Vosbeck K, Dreybrodt W (2001) Surface controlled dissolution rates of gyppsum in aqueous solutions exhibit nonlinear dissolution kinetics. Geochim Cosmichim Acta 65:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KS (1989) Development of the Wink Sink in Texas, USA, Due to salt dissolution and collapse. Environ Geol Water Sci 14(2):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KS (2008a) Evaporite-karst problems and studies in the United States. Environ Geol (this issue)

  • Johnson KS (2008b) Gypsum-karst problems in constructing dams in the United States. Environ Geol (this issue)

  • Kasting KM, Kasting EH (2003) Site characterization of sinkholes based on resolution of mapping. In: Beck BF (eds) Sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst. ASCE, Reston, pp 72–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerly PR (1982) Spatial analysis of a karst depression population: clues to genesis. Geol Soc Am Bull 93:1078–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham RM, Streufert RK, Kunk MJ, Budahn JR, Hudson MR, Perry W Jr (2002) Evaporite tectonism in the lower roaring fork river valley, west-central Colorado. In: Kirkham RM, Scott RB, Judkins W (eds) Late cenozoic evaporite tectonism and volcanism in west-central Colorado, vol 366, Geological Society of America special paper, Boulder, Colorado, pp 73–99

  • Klimchouk A (2000) Dissolution and conversions of gypsum and anhydrite. In: Klimchouk A, Ford DC, Palmer AN, Dreybrodt W (eds) Spelogenesis. Evolution of karst aquifers. National Speleological Society, Hunstville, pp 160–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimchouk A, Lowe D, Cooper A, Sauro U (1996) Gypsum karst of the World. Int J Speleol 25(3–4):1–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimchouk AB, Andrejchuk (2005) Karst breakdown mechanisms from observations in the gypsum caves of the Western Ukraine: implications for subsidence hazard assessment. Environ Geol 48:336–359

  • Klimchouk AB, Aksem SD (2005) Hydrochemistry and solution rates in gypsum karst: case study from the Western Ukraine. Environ Geol 48:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont-Black J, Baker A, Younger PL, Cooper AH (2005) Utilising seasonal variations in hydrogeochemistry and excitation-emission fluorescence to develop a conceptual groundwater flow model with implications for subsidence hazards: an example from Co. Durham, UK. Environ Geol 48:320–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux PE, Newton JG (1986) Catastrophic subsidence: an environmental hazard, Shelby county, Alabama. Environ Geol Water Sci 8:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llamas MR (1962) Estudio geológico-técnico de los terrenos yesíferos de la Cuenca del Ebro y de los problemas que plantean en los canales. Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Boletín 12, p 192

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucha P, Gutiérrez F, Iturbe J (2008) Natural and human-induced dissolution and subsidence processes in the salt outcrop of the Cardona Diapir (NE Spain). Environ Geol (this issue)

  • McCalpin JP (1996) Field techniques in paleoseismology. In: McCalpin JP (ed) Paleoseismology, Academic, San Diego, pp 33–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michetti AM, Audemard FA, Marco S (2005) Future trends in paleoseismology: integrated study of the seismic landscape as a vital toll in seismic hazard analysis. Tectonophysics 408:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.C.B. (1975) Subsidence engineers’ handbook. National Coal Board Mining Department, UK, p 111

  • Milanovic PT (2000) Geological engineering in karst. Zebra, Belgrade, p 347

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson D, Davey JC, Cooper AH, Ferris JK (1995) The application of microgravity geophysics in a phased investigation of dissolution subsidence at Ripon, Yorkshire. Q J Eng Geol (London) 28:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Paukstys WJ, Narbutas V (1996) Gypsum Karst of the Baltic Republics. In: Klimchouk A, Lowe D, Cooper A, Sauro U (eds) Gypsum karst of the World. Int J Speleol 25(3–4):279–284

  • Paukstys B, Cooper AH, Arustiene J (1999) Planning for gypsum geohazard in Lithuania and England. Eng Geol 52:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson R (1999) Geology and safety of dams case histories in gypsum karst for Horsetooth Dam and Reservoir and Carter Lake Dam No. 2, Colorado Big Thompson Project, Ft. Collins and Loveland, Colorado. US Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation. USBR Technical Service Center D-8321, Denver, Colorado, USA

  • Reuter F, Stoyan D (1993) Sinkholes in carbonate, sulphate, and chloride karst regions: Principles and problems of engineering geological investigations and predictions, with comments for the construction and mining industries. In Beck BF (ed) Applied karst geology. Proceedings of the 4th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst, Panama City/Florida/ 25-27 January 1993. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 3–25

  • Reuter F, Tolmacev N (1990) Bauen und Bergbau in Senkungs und Erdfallgebieten, Eine Ingenieurgeologie des Karstes. Schriftenreihe für Geologische Wissenschaften, vol 28. Academie-Verlag, Berlin

  • Remondo J, González A, Díaz de Terán JR, Cendrero A, Fabbri A, Chung CH-JF (2003) Validation of landslide susceptibility maps; examples and applications from a case study in Northern Spain. Nat Hazards 30:437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JJ (2003) Local land use regulation of karst in the United States. In: Beck BF (ed) Sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst. ASCE special publication 112, pp 492–501

  • Sowers GF (1996) Building on sinkholes. American Society of Civil Engineers Press, New York, p 202

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarou L, Cooper AH (1997) Gypsum karst geohazards in China. In: Beck BF, Stephenson JB (eds) The engineering geology and hydrogeology of karst terranes. Proceedings of the 6th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of Karst Springfield/Missouri/6–9 April 1997. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 117–125

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and partice. UNESCO, Paris, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadge G, Wislocki A, Pearson EJ, Whittow JB (1993) Mapping natural hazards with spatial modelling systems. In: Mather P (ed) Geographical information handling—research and applications, Wiley, NY, pp 239–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltham T, Bell F, Culshaw M (2005) Sinkholes and subsidence. Springer, Chichester, p 382

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren J (1999) Evaporites. Their evolution and economics. Blackwell, Oxford, p 438

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P (1972) Morphometric analysis of polygonal karst in New Guinea. Geol Soc Am Bull 83:761–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P (2003) Dolines. In: Gunn J (ed) Encyclopedia of caves and karst science. Fitzroy Dearborn, New York, pp 304–310

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Andrew Farrant, Dr. Andrew Gibson, and Mr. Dave Bridge are thanked for reviewing the paper. AHC publishes with the permission of the Executive Director, British Geological Survey (NERC). This work has been partially co-financed by the Spanish Education and Science Ministry and the FEDER (project CGL2004-02892/BTE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Gutiérrez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gutiérrez, F., Cooper, A.H. & Johnson, K.S. Identification, prediction, and mitigation of sinkhole hazards in evaporite karst areas. Environ Geol 53, 1007–1022 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0728-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0728-4

Keywords

Navigation