Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

The assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution aims at highlighting areas at a high risk of being polluted. This study presents a methodology, to estimate the risk of an aquifer to be polluted from concentrated and/or dispersed sources, which applies an overlay and index method involving several parameters. The parameters are categorized into three factor groups: factor group 1 includes parameters relevant to the internal aquifer system’s properties, thus determining the intrinsic aquifer vulnerability to pollution; factor group 2 comprises parameters relevant to the external stresses to the system, such as human activities and rainfall effects; factor group 3 incorporates specific geological settings, such as the presence of geothermal fields or salt intrusion zones, into the computation process. Geographical information systems have been used for data acquisition and processing, coupled with a multicriteria evaluation technique enhanced with fuzzy factor standardization. Moreover, besides assigning weights to factors, a second set of weights, i.e., order weights, has been applied to factors on a pixel by pixel basis, thus allowing control of the level of risk in the vulnerability determination and the enhancement of local site characteristics. Individual analysis of each factor group resulted in three intermediate groundwater vulnerability to pollution maps, which were combined in order to produce the final composite groundwater vulnerability map for the study area. The method has been applied in the region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace (Northern Greece), an area of approximately 14,000 km2. The methodology has been tested and calibrated against the measured nitrate concentration in wells, in the northwest part of the study area, providing results related to the aggregation and weighting procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr HJ, Petty JR, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. In: Ada OK, Robert S (eds) Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-600/2-87-035, pp 622

  • Bekesi G, McConchie J (2002) The use of aquifer-media characteristics to model vulnerability to contamination, Manawatu region, New Zealand. Hydrogeol J 10:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civita M (1994) Le carte della vulnerabilità degli acquiferiall’ inquinamento. Teoria and practica (Aquifer vulnerability maps to pollution). Pitagora, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita M, De Regibus C (1995) Sperimentazione di alcune metodologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilità degli aquiferi. Q Geol Appl Pitagora Bologna 3:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafis S, Papastergiadou E, Georgiou K, Babaloas D, Georgiadis T, Papageorgiou M, Lazaridou T, Tsiaousi V (1997) Directive 92/43/EEC. The Habitats project in Greece: Natura 2000 network. Contract B4-3200/84/756. DG Xi. Commission of the European Communities, Goulandris Museum of Natural History—Greek Biotope Wetland Center, p 932

  • Daly D, Dassargues A, Drew D, Dunne S, Goldscheider N, Neale S, Popescu IC, Zwahlen F (2002) Main concepts of the ‘European approach’ to karst-groundwater-vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeol J 10:340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantis I (1993) Investigation of water supply possibilities of coastal settlements of Thrace from coastal aquifers. Democritus University of Thrace, Division of geotechnical engineering, Laboratory of Engineering Geology, Research project 1989–1993

  • Dimadis E, Gemitzi A, Karmis P (2001) Hydrogeological study of Rodopi’s district mountainous area, Greece. Institute of Geological and Mining Exploration, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B (2005) Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis. J Hydrol 309:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B, Scott HD, Dixon JC, Steele KF (2002) Prediction of aquifer vulnerability to pesticides using fuzzy rule-based models at the regional scale. Phys Geogr 23:130–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerflinger N, Zwahlen F (1998) Praxishilfe: Kartierungder Vulnerabilität in Karstgebieten (Methode EPIK) BUWAL, Bern, pp 56

  • Doerfliger N, Jeannin PY, Zwahlen F (1999) Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environ Geol 39:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR (2003) IDRISI Kilimanjaro: Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, USA, pp 328

  • Eastman JR, Jiang H (1996) Fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation, Proceedings, Second International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, May 21–23, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp 527–534

  • Fetter CV (1994) Applied hydrogeology, 3rd edn. Macmillan College Publishing Company, New York, NY, pp 91

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvenbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, Proc Inf 38:69–86

  • Gogu RC, Dassargues A (2000) Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ Geol 39:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogu RC, Hallet V, Dassargues A (2003) Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Néblon river basin (Belgium). Environ Geol 44:881–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greek Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works (1986) Law 1650 for the Protection of the Environment. Official Gazette 160/A/1986

  • Greek Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works (1996) Joint ministerial Decision 5796/23-3-96, Official Gazette 854/B/16-9-1996

  • Jenson SK, Domingue JO (1998) Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information systems analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54:1593–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993) Ground water vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. Common Techniques for Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability, Water Science Technology Board, Committee for Geosciences and Environmental Resources, National Academy of Sciences, pp 204

  • Northwood Technologies Inc (2001) Vertical Mapper: Tutorial. Northwood Technologies Inc. and Marconi Mobile Limited, Canada, pp 133

  • Panilas CS (1998) Hydrogeological problems from the exploitation of black coal deposits with the method of open pit: the case of the black coal mineral deposit of Drama. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Patras, Department of Geology, Patra, Greece

  • Papadopoulos K, Romaidis I (2002) Hydrogeological Research of Arda’s Watershed. Institute of Geological and Mining Exploration, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos K, Favas N, Anastasiadis I, Papadopoulos P, Gemitzi A (2001) Hydrological research of Makri-Maronia area, Greece. Institute of Geological and Mining Exploration, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlikakis GE, Tsihrintzis VA (2000) Ecosystem management: a review of a new concept and methodology. Water Resour Manage 14:257–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlikakis GE, Tsihrintzis VA (2003) A quantitative method for accounting human opinion, preferences and perceptions in ecosystem management. J Environ Manage 68:193–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlikakis GE, Tsihrintzis VA (2005) Perceptions and preferences of the local population in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace National Park in Greece. Landsc Urban Planning (in press)

  • Petalas C (1997) Analysis of aquifer systems in the heterogeneous coastal plain of Rhodope region. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Thrace, Department of Civil Engineering, Xanthi, Greece

  • Petalas C, Panilas SC, Diamantis J, Pliakas F (2001) Calculation and evaluation of the hydraulic parameters of two aquifers in different sedimentary environment in mass of Rhodope. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of the Geological Society of Greece, Athens, pp 1913–1932

  • Pliakas F, Diamantis I, Petalas C (1999) Environmental effects of a proposed groundwater artificial recharge project in Orfanon region of Kavala. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology. Pythagorion, Samos, pp 381–390

  • Rao M, Sastry SVC, Yadar PD, Kharod K, Pathan SK, Dhinwa PS, Majumdar PS, Sampat Kumar D, Patkar VN, Phatak VK (1991) A weighted index model for urban suitability assessment—a GIS approach. Bombay Metropolitan Regional Development Authority, Bombay, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Math Psychol 15:234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stempvoort, Ewert L, Wassenaar L (1993) Aquifer vulnerability index: GIS-compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Resour 18:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergis E (2000) Hydrogeological study of West Thrace and East Macedonia district, Greece. Institute of Geological and Mining Exploration, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hoyer M, Sofner B (1998) Groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) areas of Germany, Federal institute for geosciences and natural resources, Archive no 117854, Hanover, Germany

  • Voogd H (1983) Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyssling L (1979) Eine neue Formel zur Berechnung der Zustromungsdauer (Laufzeit) des Grundwassers zu einem Grundwasser-Pumpwerk. Eclogae geol Helv 72:401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(1):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges the Regional Authority of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace for its support during the time needed for the completion of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Gemitzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gemitzi, A., Petalas, C., Tsihrintzis, V.A. et al. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environ Geol 49, 653–673 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0104-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0104-1

Keywords

Navigation