Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sensitivity of predatory bacteria to different surfactants and their application to check bacterial predation

  • Applied microbial and cell physiology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the toxicity of surfactants against different predatory bacteria. Tests with Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 and SDS, an anionic surfactant, showed the predator was very sensitive; 0.02% SDS completely killed the predatory population (7-log loss; < 10 PFU/ml remaining) both when free-swimming or within the bdelloplast, i.e., intraperiplasmic. Similar results were also observed with B. bacteriovorus 109J and Peredibacter starrii. In contrast, none of the prey (E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, or Pseudomonas sp. DSM 50906) viabilities were negatively affected by SDS. Triton X-100, a nonionic surfactant, was slightly less toxic towards B. bacteriovorus HD100 (viability loss of only 4-log), while two cationic surfactants, i.e., benzalkonium chloride (BZC) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), were toxic towards both the predator and prey. Based on the above findings, we tested the potential use of SDS as a means to control predation. Addition of 0.02% SDS immediately halted predation based upon the prey bioluminescence, which leveled off and remained steady. This was confirmed using the predator viabilities; no predators were found in any of the samples where SDS was added. Consequently, low concentrations of SDS can be used as a simple means to control B. bacteriovorus HD100 activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the UNIST Central Research Facilities (ucrf.unist.ac.kr), specifically Jin-Hoe Hur at the UNIST Olympus Bioimaging Center, for use of the microscopes and imaging software. We would also like to thank Dr. Ajay K. Monnappa for discussions related to this study.

Funding

Funding for this study was from the National Research Foundation of Korea within the Korea-Israel Collaborative Research Program (Grant No. 2016K1A3A1A31913217) and under the Space Core Technology Development Project (Grant No. 2017M1A3A3A02016642).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GC, JK, and RJM conceived the idea; GC, JK, HJ, and SMS conducted experiments; GC, JK, and RJM performed statistical analyses; and GC, JK, SMS, and RJM wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Mitchell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 562 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, G., Kwon, J., Soh, S.M. et al. Sensitivity of predatory bacteria to different surfactants and their application to check bacterial predation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103, 8169–8178 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10069-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10069-w

Keywords

Navigation