Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Differentiation of entC1 from entC2/entC3 with a single primer pair using simple and rapid SYBR Green-based RT-PCR melt curve analysis

  • Environmental biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In spite of their involvement in foodborne illness, the epidemiological relevance of staphylococcal enterotoxin C (SEC) subtypes is poorly documented may be due to high sequence similarity. Among subtypes, SEC1, SEC2, and SEC3 exhibit more than 97 % homology because of which specific detection tools are seldom available to identify and differentiate them. In this study, a SYBR Green-based RT-PCR followed by melt curve analysis was developed for differentiation of entC1 from entC2/entC3 using a single primer pair. Nucleotide sequences of all three subtypes were analyzed using Clustal Omega program and the region with significant sequence variation/heterogeneity (where utmost SNPs were closely located and accessible for RT-PCR) was selected for amplification by designing a single primer pair that could amplify all three subtypes. In spite of same amplicon size, entC1 showed distinct melt peak at 76 °C. However, due to high similarity between entC2 and entC3, the developed format was deficient to discriminate between them and both showed melt peak at 82 °C. Reliability of developed RT-PCR was evaluated using various naturally contaminated samples and 91 food and clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates where satisfactory results were obtained in comparison with commercial immunoassay kit and conventional PCRs using validated primers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method being reported to differentiate entC1 from entC2/entC3 using single primer pair which is unachievable by conventional PCR due to same amplicon size. As benefits, the method is sensitive, rapid, and inexpensive with no requirement of fluorescent probes, multiple primers, and post-PCR procedures. Thus, the assay might find its utility as a detection tool in epidemiological survey of foodborne outbreaks for simultaneous identification and differentiation of entC1 from entC2/entC3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ataee RA, Mohammad HA, Gholam HA, Davoud E (2014) Staphylococcal enterotoxin C in synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Iran Red Crescent Med J 16(10):e16075

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Balaban N, Rasooly A (2000) Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Int J Food Microbiol 61(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Betley MJ, Borst DW, Regassa LB (1992) Staphylococcal enterotoxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins: a comparative study of their molecular biology (part 1 of 2). Chem Immunol 55:1–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beuret C (2004) Simultaneous detection of enteric viruses by multiplex real-time RT-PCR. J Virol Methods 115(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohach GA, Dinges MM, Mitchell DT, Ohlendorf DH, Schlievert PM (1997) Exotoxins. The staphylococci in human disease. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp. 83–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohach GA, Fast DJ, Nelson RD, Schlievert PM (1990) Staphylococcal and streptococcal pyrogenic toxins involved in toxic shock syndrome and related illnesses. Crit Rev Microbiol 17(4):251–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohach GA, Schlievert PM (1989) Conservation of the biologically active portions of staphylococcal enterotoxins C1 and C2. Infect Immun 57(7):2249–2252

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bru D, Martin-Laurent F, Philippot L (2008) Quantification of the detrimental effect of a single primer-template mismatch by real-time PCR using the 16S rRNA gene as an example. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(5):1660–1663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TZ (2001) The exploitation of HAS and its application in tumor therapy. Prog Microbiol Immun China 29:63–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TR, Hsiao MH, Chiou CS, Tsen HY (2001) Development and use of PCR primers for the investigation of C1, C2 and C3 enterotoxin types of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from food-borne outbreaks. Int J Food Microbiol 71(1):63–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chu C, Yu C, Lee Y, Su Y (2012) Genetically divergent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and sec-dependent mastitis of dairy goats in Taiwan. BMC Vet Res 8(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva ER, do Carmo LS, Da Silva N (2005) Detection of the enterotoxins A, B, and C genes in Staphylococcus aureus from goat and bovine mastitis in Brazilian dairy herds. Vet Microbiol 106(1):103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deringer JR, Ely RJ, Stauffacher CV, Bohach GA (1996) Subtype-specific interactions of type C staphylococcal enterotoxins with the T-cell receptor. Mol Microbiol 22(3):523–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dong S, Luo G, Feng J, Li Q, Gao H (2001) Immunoassay of staphylococcal enterotoxin C1 by FTIR spectroscopy and electrochemical gold electrode. Electroanalysis 13(1):30–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Z, Chao F, Chao Z, Li G (2000) Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 employing a piezoelectric crystal immunosensor. Sensors Actuators B Chem 66(1):193–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guy RA, Xiao C, Horgen PA (2004) Real-time PCR assay for detection and genotype differentiation of Giardia lamblia in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 42(7):3317–3320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao MH, Chen TR, Tsen HY (2003) Novel PCR primers for specific detection of C1, C2 and C3 enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus. J Food Drug Anal 11:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmillo MD, Jeong YJ, Kim HJ, Collantes TM, Alfajaro MM, Park JG, Kim HH, Kwon HJ, Park SJ, Kang MI, Park SI (2010) Development of universal SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR for the rapid detection and quantitation of bovine and porcine toroviruses. J Virol Methods 168(1):212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hovde CJ, Hackett SP, Bohach GA (1990) Nucleotide sequence of the staphylococcal enterotoxin C3 gene sequence comparison of all three type C staphylococcal enterotoxins. Mol Gen Genomics 220:329–333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Chen X, Duan N, Wu S, Wang Z, Wei X, Wang Y (2015) Selection and characterization of DNA aptamers against Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin C1. Food Chem 166:623–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hun X, Zhujun Z (2007) A novel sensitive staphylococcal enterotoxin C1 fluoroimmunoassay based on functionalized fluorescent core-shell nanoparticle labels. Food Chem 105:1623–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr JC, Lyon JD, Roberson JR, Lupher M, Davis WC, Bohach GA (1993) Characterization of novel type C staphylococcal enterotoxins: biological and evolutionary implications. Infect Immun 61(10):4254–4262

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marrack P, Kappler J (1990) The staphylococcal enterotoxins and their relatives. Science 248(4956):705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ming-Kai X, Cheng-Gang Z (2006) Gene expression and function study of fusion immunotoxin anti-Her-2-scFv—SEC2 in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 70(1):78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mizukane R, Nakatomi M, Futsuki Y, Araki J, Asai S, Sawatari K, Hirakata Y, Maesaki S, Tomono K, Kohno S (1998) A study of virulence factors produced by MRSA strains isolated from blood samples. Kansesshogaku Zasshi Jansenshogaku Zasshi 72(8):788–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraj S, Ramlal S, Sripathy MH, Batra HV (2014) Development and evaluation of a novel combinatorial selective enrichment and multiplex PCR technique for molecular detection of major virulence-associated genes of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in food samples. J Appl Microbiol 116(2):435–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Normanno G, Firinu A, Virgilio S, Mula G, Dambrosio A, Poggiu A, Decastelli L, Mioni R, Scuota S, Bolzoni G, Di Giannatale E (2005) Coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus in food products marketed in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol 98(1):73–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser RF, Robbins RN, Noleto AL, Khoe GP, Bergdoll MS (1984) Identification, purification, and some physicochemical properties of staphylococcal enterotoxin C3. Infect Immun 45(3):625–630

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Richards GP, Watson MA, Kingsley DH (2004) A SYBR Green, real-time RT-PCR method to detect and quantitate Norwalk virus in stools. J Virol Methods 116(1):63–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ririe KM, Rasmussen RP, Wittwer CT (1997) Product differentiation by analysis of DNA melting curves during the polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 245(2):154–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, vol 3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz FJ, Steiert M, Hofmann B, Verhoef J, Hadding U, Heinz HP, Köhrer K (1998) Development of a multiplex-PCR for direct detection of the genes for enterotoxin B and C, and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Med Microbiol 47(4):335–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theron J, Cilliers J, Du Preez M, Brözel VS, Venter SN (2000) Detection of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae from environmental water samples by an enrichment broth cultivation–pit-stop semi-nested PCR procedure. J Appl Microbiol 89(3):539–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tibana A, Rayman K, Akhtar M, Szabo R (1987) Thermal stability of staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B and C in a buffered system. J Food Prot 50(3):239–242

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varga A, James D (2005) Detection and differentiation of plum pox virus using real-time multiplex PCR with SYBR Green and melting curve analysis: a rapid method for strain typing. J Virol Methods 123(2):213–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JY, Huang TP, Chang YC, Shih DYC (2003) Subtyping of enterotoxin C strains isolated from food poisoning outbreaks in Taiwan. J Food Drug Anal 11(3):239–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Xu M, Zhang H, Liu J, Li X, Zhang C (2009) Enhancement of superantigen activity and antitumor response of staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 by site-directed mutagenesis. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58 (5):677–686

  • Wehrle E, Didier A, Moravek M, Dietrich R, Martlbauer E (2009) Detection of Bacillus cereus with enteropathogenic potential by multiplex real-time PCR based on SYBR Green I. Mol Cell Probes 24(3):124–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Liu L, Xu M, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Zhang C (2013) T-cell proliferation and antitumour activities of a truncated mutant of staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 with decreased cytokine secretion. J Med Microbiol 62(3):451–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zorgani A, Essery SD, Madani O, Bentley AJ, James VS, MacKenzie DA, Keeling JW, Rambaud C, Hilton J, Blackwell CC, Weir DM (1999) Detection of pyrogenic toxins of Staphylococcus aureus in sudden infant death syndrome. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 25(1–2):103–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to DRDO for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Microbiology Division, Defence Food Research Laboratory, Siddarthanagar, Mysore, Karnataka, 570011, India

    Sowmya Nagaraj, Shylaja Ramlal, Bhavani Peddayelachagiri Venkataswamachari, Soumya Paul, Joseph Kingston & Harsh Vardhan Batra

Authors
  1. Sowmya Nagaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shylaja Ramlal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bhavani Peddayelachagiri Venkataswamachari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Soumya Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseph Kingston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Harsh Vardhan Batra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shylaja Ramlal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 274 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagaraj, S., Ramlal, S., Venkataswamachari, B.P. et al. Differentiation of entC1 from entC2/entC3 with a single primer pair using simple and rapid SYBR Green-based RT-PCR melt curve analysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100, 8495–8506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7637-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7637-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation