Abstract
The agar diffusion bioassay is the most widely used method for the quantification of nisin, due to its high sensitivity, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness. This method is based on the measurement of the inhibition zone produced in nisin-sensitive microorganisms. The size of the zone is affected by many factors, such as nisin-sensitive strain, amount of added agar and surfactant, and pre-diffusion step. This research aims to evaluate the effects of nisin-sensitive strains and pre-diffusion on the accuracy and precision of nisin quantification. Three strains of nisin-sensitive microorganisms (Micrococcus luteus, Lactobacillus sakei, Brochothrix thermosphacta) were tested along with three different incubation processes. The best combination was the method using L. sakei as an indicator strain with pre-diffusion at 4 °C for 24 h. Compared with M. luteus and B. thermosphacta, L. sakei gave more accurate and reproducible results. Moreover, the pre-diffusion step resulted in larger inhibition zones and more precise results. Finally, the best combination was validated and compared with the method that is usually used and the result showed that the method using L. sakei with pre-diffusion gave more accurate and precise results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berridge NJ, Barrett J (1952) A rapid method for the turbidimetric assay of antibiotics. J Gen Microbiol 6:14–20
Bouksaim M, Fliss I, Meghrous J, Simard RE, Lacroix C (1998) Immunodot detection of nisin Z in milk and whey using enhanced chemiluminescence. J Appl Microbiol 84:176–184
Bouksaim M, Lacroix C, Bazin R, Simard RE (1999) Production and utilization of polyclonal antibodies against nisin in an ELISA and for immuno-location of nisin in producing and sensitive bacterial strains. J Appl Microbiol 87:500–510
Budde BB, Rasch M (2001) A comparative study on the use of flow cytometry and colony forming units for assessment of the antibacterial effect of bacteriocins. Int J Food Microbiol 63:65–72
Cheigh CI, Choi HJ, Park H, Kim SB, Kook MC, Kim TS, Hwang JK, Pyun YR (2002) Influence of growth conditions on the production of a nisin-like bacteriocin by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis A164 isolated from kimchi. J Biotechnol 95:225–235
Cutter CN, Siragusa GR (1994) Decontamination of beef carcass tissue with nisin using a pilot scale model carcass washer. Food Microbiol 11:481–489
Davies EA, Delves-Broughton J (2000) Nisin. In: Batt CA, Patel PD (eds) Encyclopedia of food microbiology. Academic Press, London, pp 191–198
Delves-Broughton J (1990) Nisin and its uses as a food preservative. Food Technol 11:110–117
De Vuyst L, Vandamme EJ (1992) Influence of the carbon source on nisin production in Lactococcus lactis supsp. lactis batch fermentations. J Gen Microbiol 138:571–578
Falahee MB, Adams MR, Dale JW, Morris BA (1990) An enzyme immunoassay for nisin. Int J Food Sci Technol 25:590–595
Federal Register (1988) Nisin preparation: affirmation of GRAS status as direct human food ingredient. (Federal Register 53) US Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C.
Hirsch A (1950) The assay of the antibiotic nisin. J Gen Microbiol 4:70–74
Hirsch A (1951) Growth and nisin production of a strain of Streptococcus lactis. J Gen Microbiol 5:208–221
Kim WS, Hall RJ, Dunn NW (1997) The effect of nisin concentration and nutrient depletion on nisin production of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48:449–453
Leung PP, Khadre M, Shellhammer TH, Yousef AE (2002) Immunoassay method for quantitative determination of nisin in solution and on polymeric films. Lett Appl Microbiol 34:199–204
Linton AH (1958) Influence of inoculum size on antibiotic assays by the agar diffusion technique with special reference to Klebsiella pneumoniae and streptomycin. J Bacteriol 76:94–103
McMullen LM, Stiles ME (1996) Potential for use of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria in the preservation of meats. J Food Prot 64–71
Mocquot G, Lefebvre E (1956) A simple procedure to detect nisin in cheese. J Appl Bacteriol 19:322–323
Parente E, Ricciardi A, Villani V (1993) Evaluation of two methods for the measurement of bacteriocin activity. In: Zamorani A, Manachini PL, Bottazzi V, Coppola S (eds) Biotechnology and molecular biology of lactic acid bacteria for the improvement of foods and feeds quality. Instituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Rome, pp 318–327
Piddock LJV (1990) Techniques used for the determination of antimicrobial resistance and sensitivity in bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 68:307–318
Rogers AM, Montville TJ (1991) Improved agar diffusion assay for nisin quantification. Food Biotechnol 5:161–168
Rossana R, Del Fiore A, D’Elia A, Pesole G, Parente E, Riccio P (1998) New procedure for the determination of nisin in milk. Biotechnol Techn 12:783–786
Saurez AM, Rodriguez JMP, Morales P, Hernandez PE, Azcona-Olivera JI (1996) Development of monoclonal antibodies to the lantibiotic nisin A. J Agric Food Chem 44:2936–2940
Tramer J, Fowler GG (1964) Estimation of nisin in foods. J Sci Food Agric 15:522–528
Wahlstrom G, Saris PEJ (1999) A nisin bioassay based on bioluminescence. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3742–3745
Wolf CE, Gibbons WR (1996) Improved method for quantification of the bacteriocin nisin. J Appl Bacteriol 80:453–457
Acknowledgements
Funding for this project was provided by the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station and by a scholarship to T.P. from the Royal Thai Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pongtharangkul, T., Demirci, A. Evaluation of agar diffusion bioassay for nisin quantification. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65, 268–272 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1579-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1579-5