Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidence for three distinct hydrogenase activities in Rhodospirillum rubrum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Inducer, inhibitor, and mutant studies on three hydrogenase activities of Rhodospirillum rubrum indicate that they are mediated by three distinct hydrogenase enzymes. Uptake hydrogenase mediates H2 uptake to an unknown physiological acceptor or methylene blue and is maximally synthesized during autotrophic growth in light. Formate-linked hydrogenase is synthesized primarily during growth in darkness or when light becomes limiting, and links formate oxidation to H2 production. Carbon-monoxide-linked hydrogenase is induced whenever CO is present and couples CO oxidation to H2 evolution. The enzymes can be expressed singly or conjointly depending on growth conditions, and the inhibitor or inducer added. All three hydrogenases can use methyl viologen as the mediator for both the H2 evolution and H2 uptake reactions while displaying distinct pH optima, reversibility, and sensitivity to C2H2 gas. Yet, we present evidence that the CO-linked hydrogenase, unlike the uptake hydrogenase, does not link to methylene blue as the electron acceptor. These differences allow conditions to be established to quantitatively assay each hydrogenase independently of the others both in vivo and in vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received revision: 27 August 2001

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maness, .PC., Weaver, .P. Evidence for three distinct hydrogenase activities in Rhodospirillum rubrum . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57, 751–756 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-001-0828-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-001-0828-0

Keywords

Navigation