Skip to main content
Log in

Annual and Seasonal Variation in the Phyllosphere Bacterial Community Associated with Leaves of the Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora)

  • Plant Microbe Interactions
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phyllosphere contains a diverse bacterial community that can be intimately associated with the host plant; however, few studies have examined how the phyllosphere community changes over time. We sampled replicate leaves from a single magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) tree in the winter of three consecutive years (2007–2009) as well as during four seasons of 1 year (2008) and used molecular techniques to examine seasonal and year-to-year variation in bacterial community structure. Multivariate analysis of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of 16S rRNA gene fragments revealed minimal leaf to leaf variation and much greater temporal changes, with the summer (August 2008) leaf community being most distinct from the other seasons. This was confirmed by sequencing and analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries generated for each sample date. All phyllosphere communities were dominated by Alphaproteobacteria, with a reduction in the representation of certain Beijerinckiaceae during the summer and a concurrent increase in the Methylobacteriaceae being the most significant seasonal change. Other important components of the magnolia phyllosphere included members of the Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria, with the latter two lineages also showing differences in their representation in samples collected at different times. While the leaf-associated bacterial community sampled at the same time of year in three separate years showed some similarities, generally these communities were distinct, suggesting that while there are seasonal patterns, these may not be predictable from year to year. These results suggest that seasonal differences do occur in phyllosphere communities and that broad-leafed evergreen trees such as M. grandiflora may present interesting systems to study these changes in the context of changing environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews JH, Harris RF (2000) The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces. Ann Rev Phytopathol 38:145–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bent SJ, Forney LJ (2008) The tragedy of the uncommon: understanding limitations in the analysis of microbial diversity. ISME J 2:689–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (2005) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Volume Two: the Proteobacteria. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brewer JS (2001) Current and presettlement tree species composition of some upland forests in northern Mississippi. J Torrey Bot Soc 128:332–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture–recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohan FM (2001) Bacterial species and speciation. Syst Biol 50:513–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Jager ES, Wehner FC, Korsten L (2001) Microbial ecology of the mango phylloplane. Microb Ecol 42:201–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Delmotte N, Knief C, Chaffron S, Innerebner G, Roschitzki B, Schlapbach R, von Mering C, Vorholt JA (2009) Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:16428–16433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5069–5072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Keller K, Brodie EL, Larsen N, Piceno YM, Phan R, Andersen GL (2006) NAST: a multiple sequence alignment server for comparative analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W394–W399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doronina NV, Ivanova EG, Suzina NE, Trotsenko YA (2004) Methanotrophs and methylobacteria are found in woody plant tissues within the winter period. Mikrobiologiya 73:817–824

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunfield PF, Khmelenina VN, Suzina NE, Trotsenko YA, Dedysh SN (2003) Methylocella silvestris sp. nov., a novel methanotroph isolated from an acidic forest cambisol. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1231–1239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis RJ, Thompson IP, Bailey MJ (1999) Temporal fluctuations in the pseudomonad population associated with sugar beet leaves. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28:345–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ercolani GL (1991) Distribution of epiphytic bacteria on olive leaves and the influence of leaf age and sampling time. Microb Ecol 21:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferris MJ, Muyzer G, Ward DM (1996) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of 16S rRNA-defined populations inhabiting a hot spring microbial mat community. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:340–346

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holland MA (1997) Methylobacterium and plants. Rec Res Dev Plant Physiol 1:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson CR, Roden EE, Churchill PF (2000) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis can fail to separate 16S rDNA fragments with multiple base differences. Mol Biol Today 1:49–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson CR, Weeks AQ (2008) Influence of particle size on bacterial community structure in aquatic sediments as revealed by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5237–5240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson CR, Vallaire SC (2009) Effects of salinity and nutrients on microbial assemblages in Louisiana wetland sediments. Wetlands 29:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson CR, Langner HW, Donahoe-Christiansen J, Inskeep WP, McDermott TR (2001) Molecular analysis of microbial community structure in an arsenite-oxidizing acidic thermal spring. Environ Microbiol 3:532–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson CR, Liew KC, Yule CM (2009) Structural and functional changes with depth in microbial communities in a tropical Malaysian peat swamp forest. Microb Ecol 57:402–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson EF, Echlin HL, Jackson CR (2006) Changes in the phyllosphere community of the resurrection fern, Polypodium polypodioides, associated with rainfall and wetting. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:236–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacques M-A, Kinkel LL, Morris CE (1995) Population sizes, immigration, and growth of epiphytic bacteria on leaves of different ages and positions of field-grown endive (Cichorium endivia var. latifolia). Appl Environ Microbiol 61:899–906

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kadivar H, Stapleton AE (2003) Ultraviolet radiation alters maize phyllosphere bacterial diversity. Microb Ecol 45:353–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kemp PF, Aller JY (2004) Estimating prokaryotic diversity: when are 16S rDNA libraries large enough? Limnol Oceanog Methods 2:114–125

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kinkel LL (1997) Microbial population dynamics on leaves. Ann Rev Phytopathol 35:327–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinkel LL, Wilson M, Lindow SE (2000) Plant species and plant incubation conditions influence variability in epiphytic bacterial population size. Microb Ecol 39:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kutschera U (2007) Plant-associated Methylobacteria as co-evolved photosymbionts. Plant Signaling Behav 2:74–78

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lindow SE, Brandl MT (2003) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1875–1883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lozupone CA, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228–8235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R (2006) UniFrac—an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinform 7:371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar BA, Lai T, Steppi S, Jobb G, Förster W, Brettske I, Gerber S, Ginhart AW, Gross O, Grumann S, Hermann S, Jost R, König A, Liss T, Lüßmann R, May M, Nonhoff B, Reichel B, Strehlow R, Stamatakis A, Stuckmann N, Vilbig A, Lenke M, Ludwig T, Bode A, Schleifer K-H (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1363–1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moissl C, Osman S, La Duc MT, Dekas A, Brodie E, DeSantis TZ, Venkateswaran K (2007) Molecular bacterial community analysis of clean rooms where spacecraft are assembled. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:509–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Monier J-M, Lindow SE (2005) Aggregates of resident bacteria facilitate survival of immigrant bacteria on leaf surfaces. Microb Ecol 49:343–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rappé MS, Giovannoni SJ (2003) The uncultured microbial majority. Ann Rev Microbiol 57:369–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Redford A, Fierer N (2009) Bacterial succession on the leaf surface: a novel system for studying successional dynamics. Microb Ecol 58:189–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson IP, Bailey MJ, Fenlon JS, Fermor TR, Lilley AK, Lynch JM, McCormack PJ, McQuilken MP, Purdy KJ, Rainey PB, Whipps JM (1993) Quantitative and qualitative seasonal changes in the microbial community from the phyllosphere of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Soil 150:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Whipps JM, Hand P, Pink D, Bending GD (2008) Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype. J Appl Microbiol 105:1744–1755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang CH, Crowley DE, Borneman J, Keen NT (2001) Microbial phyllosphere populations are more complex than previously realized. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3889–3894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou J, Bruns ME, Tiedje JM (1996) DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:316–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College at The University of Mississippi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin R. Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, C.R., Denney, W.C. Annual and Seasonal Variation in the Phyllosphere Bacterial Community Associated with Leaves of the Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora). Microb Ecol 61, 113–122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9742-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9742-2

Keywords

Navigation