Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Musculoskeletal computed radiography in children: scatter reduction and improvement in bony trabecular sharpness using air gap placement of the imaging plate

  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of various air gaps on computed radiographic musculoskeletal images was investigated using a knee phantom. Scatter to primary radiation ratios were measured using the beam stop method at air gaps ranging from 0 to 30 in. (0-762-mm). Bony trabecular sharpness, line pair resolution, quantum mottle and visualization of low-contrast beads in the soft tissues were evaluated. A significant reduction of scatter to primary radiation ratio, from a value of almost 1 at table top to about 0.4 at 10-in. (254-mm) air gap and about 0.2 at 25-in. (635-mm) air gap placement of the computed radiography (CR) imaging plate, was obtained. A progressive improvement in bony trabecular sharpness and line pair resolution, compared with the table top and Bucky images was observed on 10-in. (254-mm) through 25-in. (635-mm) air gap images. Sharpness of the bony trabeculae and line pair resolution were best on the 25-in. (635-mm) air gap images. The skin entrance radiation dose does not have to be increased for air gap digital radiography. The radiographic noise or quantum mottle is highest on the Bucky image, higher on air gap images and minimal on the table top images, despite a high scatter to primary radiation ratio at the table top. The lower quantum mottle on the table top images allowed for maximal visualization of low contrast densities in the soft tissues. Air gap radiography further improves musculoskeletal computed imaging by reducing the scatter to primary radiation ratio without an increase in the skin entrance dose. For significant reduction of the scatter to primary radiation ratio and best evaluation of line pair spatial resolution and bony trabeculae, a 25-in. (635-mm) air gap with digital radiography would be optimal. For evaluation of low contrast densities in the soft tissues, table top placement would be the technique of choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorenson JA, Nelson JA, Niklason LT, Jacobsen SC (1980) Rotating disk device for slit radiography of the chest. Radiology 134: 227–231

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Michel M, Ter-Pogossian (1969) The physical aspects of diagnostic radiology, Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Landes JR, Koch GG (1974) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tucker DM, Souto M, Barnes GT (1993) Scatter in computed radiography. Radiology 188: 271–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhns LR, Kottamasu SR (1995) Pediatric air-gap chest digital imaging: an experimental study. Pediatr Radiol 25: S99-S201

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neitzel U (1992) Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. Med Phys 19: 475–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphey MD, Bramble JM, Cook LT, Martin NL, Dwyer SJ (1990) Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 174: 865–870

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wegryn SA (1990) Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study. Radiology 175: 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murphey MD (1989) Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption. AJR 152: 541–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Richmond BJ, Powers C, Piraino DW, Freed H, Meziane MA, Hale JC, Schluchter MD, Schils J, Gragg LA (1992) Diagnostic efficacy of digitized images vs. plain films: a study of the joints of the fingers. AJR 158: 437–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson AJ (1991) Photostimulable phosphor digital radiography of the extremities: diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional radiography. AJR 157: 533–538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphey MD, Quale JL, Martin NL, Bramble JM, Cook LT, Dwyer SJ III (1992) Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art. AJR 158: 1071–1080

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Imaging, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, 3901 Beaubien Blvd., 48201-2196, Detroit, MI, USA

    Sam R. Kottamasu

  2. Department of Radiology, Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Lawrence R. Kuhns

Authors
  1. Sam R. Kottamasu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lawrence R. Kuhns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kottamasu, S.R., Kuhns, L.R. Musculoskeletal computed radiography in children: scatter reduction and improvement in bony trabecular sharpness using air gap placement of the imaging plate. Pediatr Radiol 27, 119–123 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050081

Keywords

Search

Navigation