Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of CXR for the diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia

  • Original article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) continues to be prevalent, despite new treatment, in part because of increased survival in less mature infants. Investigations of new treatments have been hampered by a lack of universally accepted diagnostic criteria. Radiographic scoring systems have been developed to provide objective assessment of lung injury and risk for chronic lung disease. Objective. We sought to test the reliability of a recently reported system using chest radiography as the main tool for diagnosis of BPD. Materials and methods. One hundred chest radiographs, half demonstrating BPD and the other half without BPD, were analyzed by pediatric radiologists and by a neonatologist, using the Weinstein score (1–6, depending on increasing radiographic severity). The reliability of this scoring system was tested by kappa (k) statistics. Results. Reliability at the lowest threshold (dividing score 1 from score ≥ 2) was unacceptably low in this population. Reliability increased with inclusion of higher BPD scores in the comparison groups: 1–3 versus 4–6. Conclusion. Using the chest radiograph for the prediction of BPD is not reliable between different observers except at the two extremes of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 22 May 2000 Accepted: 30 October 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moya, M., Bisset III, G., Auten Jr., R. et al. Reliability of CXR for the diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatric Radiology 31, 339–342 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470000420

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470000420

Keywords

Navigation