Abstract
Background
Head computed tomography (CT) is the current standard of care for evaluating infants at high risk of abusive head trauma.
Objective
To both assess the feasibility of using a previously developed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain injury screen (MRBRscreen) in the acute care setting in place of head CT to identify intracranial hemorrhage in high-risk infants and to compare the accuracy of a rapid imaging pulse sequence (single-shot T2 fast spin echo [ssT2FSE]) to a conventional pulse sequence (conventional T2 fast spin echo [conT2FSE]).
Materials and methods
This was a quality improvement initiative to evaluate infants <12 months of age who were screened for intracranial hemorrhage using an MRBRscreen as part of clinical care. The MRBRscreen included axial conT2FSE, axial gradient recalled echo, coronal T1-weighted inversion recovery, axial diffusion-weighted image and an axial ssT2FSE. A comparison of ssT2FSE to conT2FSE with respect to lesion detection was also performed.
Results
Of 158 subjects, the MRBRscreen was able to be completed in 155 (98%); 9% (14/155) were abnormal. Ninety-four percent (137/145) of subjects underwent only an MRBRscreen and avoided both radiation from head CT and sedation from MRI. The axial ssT2FSE and conT2FSE results were congruent 99% of the time.
Conclusion
An MRBRscreen in place of a head CT is feasible and potentially could decrease head CT use by more than 90% in this population. Using a rapid ssT2FSE in place of a conT2FSE can reduce total scan time without losing lesion detection. If an MRBRscreen is readily available, physicians’ threshold to perform neuroimaging may be lowered and lead to earlier detection of abusive head trauma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Bilo RA, van Duurling LL et al (2013) Abusive head trauma in young children in the Netherlands: evidence for multiple incidents of abuse. Acta Paediatr 102:e497–e501
Petska HW, Sheets LK, Knox BL (2013) Facial bruising as a precursor to abusive head trauma. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 52:86–88
Oral R, Yagmur F, Nashelsky M et al (2008) Fatal abusive head trauma cases: consequence of medical staff missing milder forms of physical abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care 24:816–821
Ricci L, Giantris A, Merriam P et al (2003) Abusive head trauma in Maine infants: medical, child protective, and law enforcement analysis. Child Abuse Negl 27:271–283
Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A et al (1999) Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA 281:621–626
Letson MM, Cooper JN, Deans KJ et al (2016) Prior opportunities to identify abuse in children with abusive head trauma. Child Abuse Negl 60:36–45
Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Boos S, Spivack B et al (2012) Abusive head trauma part II: radiological aspects. Eur J Pediatr 171:617–623
Ginde AA, Foianini A, Renner DM et al (2008) Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 15:780–783
Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW et al (2004) A population-based comparison of clinical and outcome characteristics of young children with serious inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics 114:633–639
Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Boos S, Spivack B et al (2012) Educational paper: abusive head trauma part I. clinical aspects. Eur J Pediatr 171:415–423
Menoch MJ, Hirsh DA, Khan NS et al (2012) Trends in computed tomography utilization in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 129:e690–e697
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284
Bressan S, Romanato S, Mion T et al (2012) Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 19:801–807
Hennelly KE, Mannix R, Nigrovic LE et al (2013) Pediatric traumatic brain injury and radiation risks: a clinical decision analysis. J Pediatr 162:392–397
Foerster BR, Petrou M, Lin D et al (2009) Neuroimaging evaluation of non-accidental head trauma with correlation to clinical outcomes: a review of 57 cases. J Pediatr 154:573–577
Yu CK, Yuen VM, Wong GT, Irwin MG (2013) The effects of anaesthesia on the developing brain: a summary of the clinical evidence. F1000Res 2:166
Kemp AM, Rajaram S, Mann M et al (2009) What neuroimaging should be performed in children in whom inflicted brain injury (iBI) is suspected? A systematic review. Clin Radiol 64:473–483
Patel DM, Tubbs RS, Pate G et al (2014) Fast-sequence MRI studies for surveillance imaging in pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:440–447
Iskandar BJ, Sansone JM, Medow J, Rowley HA (2004) The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 101:147–151
Rozovsky K, Ventureyra EC, Miller E (2013) Fast-brain MRI in children is quick, without sedation, and radiation-free, but beware of limitations. J Clin Neurosci 20:400–405
Young JY, Duhaime AC, Caruso PA, Rincon SP (2016) Comparison of non-sedated brain MRI and CT for the detection of acute traumatic injury in children 6 years of age or less. Emerg Radiol 23:325–331
Ryan ME, Jaju A, Ciolino JD, Alden T (2016) Rapid MRI evaluation of acute intracranial hemorrhage in pediatric head trauma. Neuroradiology 58:793–799
Flom L, Fromkin J, Panigrahy A et al (2016) Development of a screening MRI for infants at risk for abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 46:519–526
Christian CW, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics (2015) The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics 135:e1337–e1354
Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170
American College of Radiology (2016) ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of Skeletal Surveyshttps://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Skeletal-Survey.pdf. Accessed 17 December 2018
Meyer JS, Gunderman R, Coley BD et al (2011) ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected physical abuse-child. J Am Coll Radiol 8:87–94
Berger RP, Panigrahy A, Gottschalk S, Sheetz M (2016) Effective radiation dose in a skeletal survey performed for suspected child abuse. J Pediatr 171:310–312
King MA, Kanal KM, Relyea-Chew A et al (2009) Radiation exposure from pediatric head CT: a bi-institutional study. Pediatr Radiol 39:1059–1065
Kanal KM, Graves JM, Vavilala MS et al (2015) Variation in CT pediatric head examination radiation dose: results from a national survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W293–W301
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Tom Sutcavage, who pulled the data, and Julia Wallace and Eleanor Zinn, who assisted with data cleaning and provided administrative assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berger, R.P., Furtado, A.D., Flom, L.L. et al. Implementation of a brain injury screen MRI for infants at risk for abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 50, 75–82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04506-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04506-1