Skip to main content
Log in

Endovascular treatment of surgical mesoportal and portosystemic shunt dysfunction in pediatric patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Published data describing the endovascular treatment of dysfunctional mesoportal and portosystemic shunts in the pediatric population are limited.

Objective

We sought to describe the treatment and follow-up of such shunts managed by interventional radiology at a single pediatric hospital. We hypothesized that stenotic and occluded pediatric portosystemic and mesoportal shunts can be maintained patent by interventional radiology in the moderate term.

Materials and methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study at a tertiary pediatric hospital. We included children with surgical mesoportal (meso-Rex) or portosystemic (mesocaval, splenorenal or splenocaval) shunts treated with attempted angioplasty or stenting from 2010 to 2018. Technical success was defined as catheterization and intervention upon the shunt with venographic evidence of flow improvement. The primary outcome variables were shunt patency at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure and freedom from reintervention.

Results

Twenty pediatric patients (11 boys, 9 girls; mean age 8.25 years, range 1.3–17 years) met inclusion criteria. Fifty-two interventions (primary and reintervention) on 13 splenorenal, 3 meso-Rex, 2 mesocaval and 2 splenocaval shunts were performed because of evidence of shunt failure, including gastrointestinal bleeding, hypersplenism, or radiographic evidence of a flow defect. The 11 stenotic shunts were treated with 100% technical success, while the remaining 9 occluded shunts were treated with 66.7% technical success. The mean number of reinterventions was 1.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.1) per child, which did not differ between stenotic and occluded shunts (P=0.24). Primary patency at 1-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-months follow-up visits was 17/17 (100%), 10/16 (62.5%), 7/15 (46.7%) and 4/10 (40%), respectively. However, 100% of shunts were either primary patent or primary-assisted patent by endovascular reintervention. There were no cases of shunt occlusion following initial technical success. Finally, the median freedom from reintervention duration was 387 days (SD=821 days).

Conclusion

Dysfunctional portosystemic surgical shunts are effectively managed by endovascular methods. While many shunts require reintervention, combined primary patency and assisted primary patency rates are excellent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shneider BL, Bosch J, De Franchis R et al (2012) Portal hypertension in children: expert pediatric opinion on the report of the Baveno v consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. Pediatr Transplant 16:426–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gauthier F (2005) Recent concepts regarding extra-hepatic portal hypertension. Semin Pediatr Surg 14:216–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuchs J, Warmann S, Kardorff R et al (2003) Mesenterico-left portal vein bypass in children with congenital extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis: a unique curative approach. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 36:213–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mishra PK, Patil NS, Saluja S et al (2016) High patency of proximal splenorenal shunt: a myth or reality? — a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 27:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel N, Grieve A, Hiddema J et al (2017) Surgery for portal hypertension in children: a 12-year review. S Afr Med J 107:12132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dasgupta R, Roberts E, Superina RA, Kim PC (2006) Effectiveness of rex shunt in the treatment of portal hypertension. J Pediatr Surg 41:108–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ketelsen D, Warmann SW, Schaefer JF et al (2012) Percutaneous revascularization of reoccluded meso-rex shunts in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 47:E23–E28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prasad a S, Gupta S, Kohli V et al (1994) Proximal splenorenal shunts for extrahepatic portal venous obstruction in children. Ann Surg 219:193–196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Thornton RH, Kerlan RK, Gordon RL et al (2005) Percutaneous salvage of a failing rex shunt. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:399–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bambini DA, Superina R, Almond PS et al (2000) Experience with the rex shunt (mesenterico-left portal bypass) in children with extrahepatic portal hypertension. J Pediatr Surg 35:13–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sancak T, Karagulle AT, Bilgic S et al (2002) Stent angioplasty of closed mesocaval shunt in a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25:332–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruff RJ, Chuang VP, Alspaugh JP et al (1987) Percutaneous vascular intervention after surgical shunting for portal hypertension. Radiology 164:469–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lautz TB, Kim ST, Donaldson JS, Superina RA (2012) Outcomes of percutaneous interventions for managing stenosis after meso-rex bypass for extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lillegard JB, Hanna AM, McKenzie TJ et al (2010) A single-institution review of portosystemic shunts in children: an ongoing discussion. HPB Surg 2010:964597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Orloff MJ, Orloff MS, Rambotti M (1994) Treatment of bleeding esophagogastric varices due to extrahepatic portal hypertension: results of portal-systemic shunts during 35 years. J Pediatr Surg 29:142–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shim DJ, Ko G-Y, Sung K-B et al (2018) Long-term outcome of portal vein stent placement in pediatric liver transplant recipients: a comparison with balloon angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 29:800–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Woerner A, Shivaram G, Koo KSH et al (2018) Clinical and imaging predictors of surgical splenorenal shunt dysfunction in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 66:e139–e145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The drawings in Fig. 1 were created by Kate Sweeney, medical illustrator, Seattle, WA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Monroe.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stein, E.J., Shivaram, G.M., Koo, K.S.H. et al. Endovascular treatment of surgical mesoportal and portosystemic shunt dysfunction in pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1344–1353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04458-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04458-6

Keywords

Navigation