Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying intestinal malrotation on magnetic resonance examinations ordered for unrelated indications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anatomical imaging findings indicating normal bowel rotation can be identified on cross-sectional imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed for non-related indications.

Objective

The goal of our study was to assess whether non-targeted MRI can accurately assess intestinal malrotation.

Materials and methods

Four anatomical landmarks were assessed on MRIs of the chest, spine or abdomen performed from January 2006 to June 2014, on patients who also had upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) performed within 10 years of the MRI date: 1) retroperitoneal duodenum, 2) left upper quadrant duodenojejunal junction, 3) superior mesenteric artery to the left of the superior mesenteric vein, and 4) right lower quadrant cecum. Two attending radiologists, one pediatric and one abdominal radiologist, independently reviewed the MR images. The pediatric radiologist reviewed images from UGI (considered the gold standard) to determine the intestinal rotation for each case. Validation of the criteria was performed on new patients imaged through January 2016.

Results

The original cohort included 109 MRIs (15 chest, 41 spine and 53 abdomen) done on 109 patients (42% males, mean age: 10.2 years). If each of the 4 anatomical questions were answered “yes” (4-YES), specificity was 100% for each radiologist and malrotation was appropriately excluded. Using the 4-YES criteria, the pediatric radiologist excluded malrotation in 71 patients (65%) and the abdominal radiologist excluded it in 65 (60%), with concurrence for 57 patients. Validation of the 4-YES criteria in 23 new patients appropriately proved the 4-YES rule, with neither labeling the one new malrotation case 4-YES.

Conclusion

If a radiologist can confidently answer “yes” to the four questions evaluated in this study, then intestinal rotation can be safely considered normal. Normal bowel rotation should be commented upon in MRI reports when these four anatomical locations are imaged, thus helping patients avoid unnecessary UGI and radiation exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Applegate K (2009) Evidence-based diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus. Pediatr Radiol 39:S161–S163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lampl B, Levin T, Berdon W et al (2009) Malrotation and midgut volvulus: a historical review and current controversies in diagnosis and management. Pediatr Radiol 39:359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Newman B, Koppolu R, Murphy D et al (2014) Heterotaxy syndromes and abnormal bowel rotation. Pediatr Radiol 44:542–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larson-Nath CM, Wagner AJ, Goday PS (2014) Use of upper gastrointestinal series before gastrostomy tube placement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 58:613–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strouse P (2008) Malrotation. Semin Roentgenol 43:7–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yousefzadeh D (2009) The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 39:S172–S177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Emigh B, Gordon CL, Connolly BL et al (2013) Effective dose estimation for pediatric upper gastrointestinal examinations using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology. Pediatr Radiol 43:1108–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ritenour ER (2013) Answer to question #10655 submitted to “ask the experts.” Health Physics Society. https://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q10655.html#. Accessed 18 Mar 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill S. Fay.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fay, J.S., Chernyak, V. & Taragin, B.H. Identifying intestinal malrotation on magnetic resonance examinations ordered for unrelated indications. Pediatr Radiol 47, 1477–1482 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3903-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3903-0

Keywords

Navigation