Abstract
There is a lack of standardized approach and terminology to classify the diverse spectrum of manifestations in tuberculosis. It is important to recognize the different clinical and radiographic patterns to guide treatment. As a result of changing epidemiology, there is considerable overlap in the radiologic presentations of primary tuberculosis and post-primary tuberculosis. In this article we promote a standardized approach in clinical and radiographic classification for children suspected of having or diagnosed with childhood tuberculosis. We propose standardized terms to diminish confusion and miscommunication, which can affect management. In addition, we present pitfalls and limitations of imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Numerous articles have been published regarding childhood tuberculosis but there is still a lack of standardized approach and terminology to classify the diverse spectrum of manifestations in tuberculosis. It is important to recognize the different clinical and radiographic patterns because management of each condition is varied. A classification of disease manifestation that is common to all will help to facilitate communication and understanding among scientific communities.
Generally the pathological changes in childhood tuberculosis are pauci-bacillary, and thus the diagnosis of intrathoracic tuberculosis depends largely on chest imaging [1]. Pulmonary tuberculosis has been classically classified as primary tuberculosis in children and post-primary tuberculosis in adults. However, because of the changing epidemiology there is a considerable overlap in the radiologic presentations of these entities [2].
In this article we promote a standardized combined clinical and radiographic approach for children suspected of having or diagnosed with childhood tuberculosis. We propose standardized terms to diminish confusion and miscommunication, which can affect management. In addition, we present pitfalls and limitations of imaging in childhood tuberculosis diagnosis. The atypical radiologic patterns seen in immunocompromised children, however, are not discussed in this article.
Clinical categories for intrathoracic tuberculosis in children [3,4,5]
Intrathoracic tuberculosis has been classified based on clinical, laboratory and radiologic evidence. The child should present at least one sign or symptom suggestive of tuberculosis but without any other plausible etiology. These signs and symptoms include any of (a) persistent cough; (b) weight loss/failure to thrive; (c) persistent unexplained fever, or (d) persistent, unexplained lethargy or reduced activity. The following sections are definitions that have been proposed to indicate the degree of certainty of the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Confirmed tuberculosis
Tuberculosis is confirmed when the culture from a specimen representative of intrathoracic disease (e.g., sputum, nasopharyngeal/gastric aspirate, pleural fluid) is positive, and more recently when Xpert MTB/RIF — a rapid test to simultaneously detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin — from any specimen is positive.
The Xpert MTB/RIF is not only sensitive and specific for diagnosing pediatric pulmonary mycobacterial tuberculosis but is also effective in detecting rifampicin resistance [6, 7]. The World Health Organization in 2013 [8] strongly recommended Xpert MTB/RIF for use rather than conventional microscopy, culture and drug-susceptibility testing as the initial diagnostic test in children suspected of having multidrug-resistant-tuberculosis or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculosis. This test can also be used (conditional recommendation) rather than conventional microscopy and culture as the initial diagnostic test in all children suspected of having tuberculosis.
Probable tuberculosis
Children in this category have chest radiographs showing findings consistent with intrathoracic tuberculosis disease, and at least one of the following:
-
(a)
positive clinical response to anti-tuberculosis therapy,
-
(b)
documented exposure/close contact with a known tuberculosis patient, or
-
(c)
positive tuberculin skin test or interferon-gamma release assay.
Possible tuberculosis
There are two scenarios in this category. One is when the chest radiograph is not consistent with tuberculous disease, but at least one of the criteria in the prior section is present. The other possibility is when the chest radiography is consistent with tuberculosis disease but none of the criteria in the prior section is present.
Some children are symptomatic but have chest radiography findings that are not consistent with tuberculous disease and have none of the criteria mentioned in probable tuberculosis. These children are categorized as either unlikely tuberculosis if no alternative diagnosis is established or not tuberculosis if an alternative diagnosis is established such as cardiac disease, foreign body aspiration or asthma. Those who have documented exposure or close contact with a known tuberculosis patient but are asymptomatic and have negative tuberculin skin test and chest radiography are considered tuberculosis exposed. No treatment is necessary for these children.
Tuberculous infection and tuberculous disease have to be differentiated because treatments for these two entities are different. We propose simple definitions. When a child has a positive tuberculin skin test but does not show any of the probable tuberculosis symptoms and has a normal chest radiograph, this might be classified as tuberculous infection and could be treated with one-drug therapy [9]. However when the findings in the chest radiographs are consistent with tuberculosis, this is considered tuberculous disease and warrants treatment with at least three drugs [9,10,11]. In the next sections we discuss chest radiography findings that are consistent with tuberculous disease seen in possible or probable tuberculosis.
Primary pulmonary tuberculous disease
The major route of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is by inhalation [1]. Infection begins when infected droplets are deposited in the terminal airway or alveoli, followed by a localized parenchymal inflammation or pneumonic process called the primary (Ghon) focus. There is then spread via draining lymphatic vessels, usually to the ipsilateral central or regional lymph nodes, which then enlarge. The upper lobes drain to the ipsilateral paratracheal nodes, while the rest of the lung drains to the perihilar nodes. The parenchymal focus and the enlarged lymph nodes are called the primary (Ranke or Ghon) complex [1, 2, 12,13,14,15,16,17] (Figs. 1 and 2).
Incubation can be up to 6 weeks from exposure, during which time chest radiographs are normal. After 1–3 months from exposure, hilar or mediastinal adenopathy can be visualized in 50–70% of cases [18,19,20]. Primary tuberculosis reflects a patient’s conversion from insensitivity to having the antigens of the tubercle bacilli [2, 14].
Regional (perihilar or paratracheal) lymphadenopathy is the radiologic hallmark of primary infection in childhood [1, 13] (Figs. 3 and 4). Anteroposterior and lateral views are required for optimal lymph node visualization [13, 21], but it can remain difficult to visualize enlarged lymph nodes with certainty [1, 22]. The most common sites of nodal involvement are the right paratracheal and hilar regions [13, 17].
The prevalence of adenopathy decreases with age; it is 100% in children <3 years of age and 88% in older children. The prevalence of parenchymal involvement detectable on radiographs, however, is significantly lower in children <3 years of age (51%) as compared with that in older children (78%) [13].
If the child is immunocompetent, the lesions heal and become dormant while still causing continuous antigenic stimulation for maintenance of hypersensitivity to tuberculous antigen. Thus the tuberculin skin test is positive in 95% of cases. This has been referred to as latent tuberculous infection. The caseating necrosis within the Ghon focus and infected lymph node frequently calcifies [1, 2]. Calcification can occur from 6 months to 4 years after infection, occurring earlier in young children [1]. The parenchymal focus, called pulmonary tuberculomas (Fig. 5), which are identified radiographically, represent sharply defined ovoid granulomas, solitary or multiple, ranging in size from 0.4 cm to 5 cm in diameter [2, 23]. Children with latent tuberculous infection can be treated with a one-drug therapy provided there was no prior treatment.
If immunity is inadequate, the disease progresses either locally or in other parts of the lung or body, with spread of infection via the airways, lymphatics or bloodstream [15, 16]. Clinically active tuberculous disease can develop within 5 years after infection. This is called progressive primary tuberculosis [2, 24].
Progressive primary tuberculous disease
Progression from infection to disease usually occurs within 1 year after the primary infection in more than 90% of cases. It is bimodal in age distribution, with children younger than 5 years and adolescents being at increased risk [1, 17, 25].
Early disease progression can happen 2–6 months from exposure, when homogeneous consolidation can occur (Fig. 6). Obstructive atelectasis or overinflation can result from compression by an adjacent enlarged node. Distribution is typically on the right side at the level of the right lobar bronchus or bronchus intermedius. Fibrosis and destruction of the lung parenchyma result in traction bronchiectasis and formation of cavities (Fig. 7), respectively [2]. This is known as progressive Ghon focus [18,19,20].
Primary progressive tuberculous disease in a 15-month-old boy. Axial contrast-enhanced CT image shows progressive Ghon focus (asterisk) in the right middle lobe and progressive hilar lymphadenopathy (arrow). The enlarged lymph node demonstrates the characteristic central necrosis with peripheral enhancement (rim sign)
Three possible mechanisms are involved in the formation of cavities: (1) progressive primary spread of disease with extensive and bilateral pulmonary cavities, (2) cavities caused by bronchial obstruction by lymph nodes or (3) post-primary tuberculosis showing cavities that are usually single and unilateral in the upper lobe. These have fairly equal incidence [26].
Lymph nodes can continue to enlarge 4–12 months from exposure and can cause progression of the disease affecting the airways, pleura and pericardium, which are discussed in the next sections. On contrast-enhanced CT, involved lymph nodes often measure more than 2 cm and show a very characteristic, but not pathognomonic, rim sign consisting of a low-density center surrounded by a peripheral enhancing rim [17, 22, 27] (Fig. 6). The esophagus, lymphatic duct and phrenic nerve might also be affected, producing tracheoesophageal fistula, chylothorax and diaphragmatic palsy, respectively [1, 18,19,20]. Hematogenous miliary dissemination can also occur in this stage.
Miliary tuberculosis
Miliary tuberculosis is seen in 8% of cases [25], usually in the younger age group because of immature immune function [28]. It is an acute hematogenously disseminated infection presenting as innumerable ≤2-mm non-calcified nodules scattered in both lungs [1, 2, 18,19,20, 28,29,30] (Figs. 8 and 9). There is no pathognomonic finding for tuberculosis except for miliary tuberculosis [28], and it can be seen in primary and post-primary disease [2].
In 25–40% cases, chest radiographs are initially normal [1, 30]. CT is more sensitive for miliary disease before it becomes radiographically apparent. The tiny nodules can be sharply or poorly defined, and are seen in a diffuse, random distribution, often with intra- and interlobular septal thickening [16].
Lymphobronchial/lymphotracheobronchial tuberculosis
Lymphobronchial or lymphotracheobronchial involvement is a complication in 2–4% of tuberculosis cases [2, 31]. Lymphadenopathy is seen in chest radiographs in 63–95% [26] and on CT in up to 96–100% of tracheobronchial tuberculosis cases [32, 33]. The enlarged nodes compress the adjacent trachea or bronchi, causing luminal narrowing and resulting in lung hyperinflation from partial obstruction with check-valve effect (Fig. 10), or atelectasis due to a complete obstruction (Figs. 11 and 12). These nodes subsequently erode, perforate and discharge caseous material into the airways manifesting as obstructive pneumonia [1, 2, 13, 14, 17,18,19,20, 33,34,35,36]. Lymphogenic and hematogenous spread into the large airways have also been reported [2].
Radiographic manifestations in lymphotracheobronchial tuberculosis are nonspecific, and a normal chest radiograph does not rule out airway involvement. Involvement of the central airways can be easily missed on radiographs. Persistent segmental or lobar collapse, lobar hyperinflation and obstructive pneumonia are seen as complications of the airway compression [31, 33].
Enhancement and enlargement (usually >2 cm) of adjacent mediastinal lymph nodes are common findings at CT in the active stage of stenosis. The enlarged lymph nodes are commonly identified in the subcarinal [37], paratracheal and perihilar (infrahilar) regions closely abutting or compressing the airways [33].
The most commonly involved airway is the bronchus intermedius, followed by the left main bronchus and trachea [37]. Bronchial narrowing can be smooth or irregular, with mural thickening [33, 38]. Smooth bronchial narrowing is caused by compression by an adjacent node, and the irregular narrowing correlates with significant mucosal irregularity, caseation, granuloma formation or even perforation [33].
The obstructive infiltrates can be resorbed or calcify, fibrose with traction bronchiectasis (Fig. 13) or cause lung destruction [2]. There is often excessive inflammation, which can result in dense alveolar consolidation and eventual parenchymal breakdown [1]. Cicatricial bronchostenosis can manifest as concentric narrowing, uniform wall thickening, and involvement of a long bronchial segment after healing [31].
Pleural tuberculous disease
Another site of extrapulmonary involvement, aside from lymph nodes, is the pleurae [25]. Its prevalence increases with age. Pleural effusion (Figs. 14 and 15) most often results from obstruction of the lymphatic drainage or hypersensitivity reaction than from direct seeding into the pleura. This explains why pleural fluid cultures are mostly negative [28]. Spread to the pleura might also come from a caseating granuloma near the pleura or via hematogenous dissemination [2].
Pleural effusion and cardiac involvement in a 10-year-old girl with primary progressive tuberculous disease. a Posteroanterior chest radiograph shows an enlarged cardiac shadow (arrowheads) with pleural effusion (asterisk) on the left. b Follow-up axial contrast-enhanced CT image demonstrates bilateral pleural effusions (asterisks) and pericardial effusion (arrows)
As a complication of primary tuberculosis, pleural involvement is most frequently observed in older children and adolescents. It can occur 3–6 months after infection and is sometimes asymptomatic [2]. It is also typically appreciated in association with parenchymal or nodal disease [39]. Pleural effusions are associated with air-space consolidation in 29% and could be bilateral or loculated in 6% of cases [17]. This is usually self-limiting and prognosis is good. Residual pleural calcifications appear in some cases [2].
The effusion can complicate into an exudative effusion, empyema or infiltration of the thoracic duct [18,19,20]. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows smooth thickening of visceral and parietal pleura (“split-pleura” sign) [40]. An Air-fluid level in the pleural space indicates presence of bronchopleural fistula [41]. The empyema can also spread beyond the parietal pleura to produce a subcutaneous abscess, called empyema necessitatis [42].
Pericardial disease
Tuberculous pericarditis is a relatively uncommon complication of primary tuberculosis. It has been reported in 1% of cases. It is commonly caused by direct extension of lymph nodes into the posterior pericardial sac [28], although miliary spread has been reported [28, 43]. CT shows lymphadenopathy and pericardial thickening with or without effusion. Constrictive pericarditis with fibrous or calcified pericardial thickening of usually >3 mm occur in about 10% of patients [43]. Pericardial effusion (Figs. 15, 16 and 17), commonly serous type [28], can result in globular enlargement of the heart shadow (water bottle sign) [1].
Post-primary tuberculosis
Post-primary tuberculosis is also known as adult-type, reactivation or secondary tuberculosis and sometimes phthisis [2]. This results from the reactivation of dormant foci. It is further observed in the pediatric age group, mostly in adolescents [2, 13]. It is considered a late disease progression of the primary infection, which can occur 8–24 months from exposure and in children as young as 8 years [18,19,20].
The most commonly affected locations are the apical and posterior segments of the upper lobes and the apical segment of the lower lobes because of higher oxygen tension (Fig. 18). Initially there might be cloudy opacification in a segment before coalescence and parenchymal breakdown. Complications include cavitation, bronchogenic spread with bronchopneumonic consolidation, exudative pleuritis, cicatrization atelectasis of the upper lobe with retraction of hilum and formation of traction bronchiectasis [1, 2, 44,45,46]. Lymph node enlargement is not common in comparison to primary tuberculosis [18,19,20].
Cavitation is radiographically evident in 40% of cases of post-primary disease. The walls of the cavities might appear thin and smooth or thick and nodular. It is difficult to distinguish thin-walled cavities from bullae, cysts or pneumatoceles. Cystic bronchiectasis should also be considered when multiple cavities are present [47] (Figs. 18 and 19).
In 20% of post-primary tuberculosis cases, bronchogenic spread appears on radiographs as multiple, ill-defined micronodules in a segmental or lobar distribution, typically in the lower-lung zones [48]. High-resolution CT, the modality of choice, demonstrates centrilobular nodules ranging 2–4 mm with linear branching opacities (“tree-in-bud” sign) which represent caseous necrosis at and around terminal and respiratory bronchioles [49] (Fig. 20). Complete destruction of the entire lung or a large part of a lung is not uncommon in the end stage of tuberculosis. Secondary pyogenic or fungal infection can occur [47]. Miliary tuberculosis and tuberculomas might also be encountered in post-primary tuberculosis [2, 50].
Post-primary tuberculous disease with bronchogenic spread in a 15-year-old girl. a Posteroanterior chest radiograph of shows ill-defined infiltrates in the left upper lobe (encircled). b Coronal reconstruction CT image demonstrates multiple centrilobular nodules (arrows) with linear branching opacities (tree-in-bud sign)
Approach to classification of intrathoracic tuberculosis
We adapted the clinical and laboratory components of the classification from Graham et al. [3], Moyo et al. [4] and Triasih [5]. An imaging approach to interpretation is summarized in Fig. 21. The radiologic side of the algorithm is based on the pathological processes that occur in tuberculosis that result in various complications.
This is the proposed approach to classify intrathoracic tuberculosis in children. It includes clinical, laboratory and radiologic (in black background) components. The imaging characteristics follow the pathological processes and the possible complications that occur. The impression of the imaging findings should contain the main pathology (i.e. primary tuberculosis infection, primary progressive tuberculous disease or post-primary tuberculous disease) followed by the various complications present (e.g., primary progressive tuberculosis with lymphobronchial involvement and pleural disease). CXR chest radiograph, IGRA interferon-gamma release assay, LTBI latent tuberculous infection, TB tuberculosis/tuberculous, TST tuberculin skin test, Xpert MTB/RIF test to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin [8]
Whenever a child comes in for workup for a possible tuberculous infection or disease, it is important to be aware of the terminology and pathological pathways. The diagnosis or impression of the imaging findings should contain the main pathology (i.e. primary tuberculous infection, primary progressive tuberculous disease or post-primary tuberculous disease), followed by the various complications present (e.g., primary progressive tuberculosis with tracheobronchial involvement and pleural disease; Fig. 21).
Pitfalls and limitations of imaging
Chest radiography is the primary screening tool in children suspected of having tuberculosis. It has, however, high intra- and inter-observer variability, with 74% specificity and 39% sensitivity [51] even in the best technical quality radiographs. A normal chest radiograph does not rule out tuberculosis [52]. CT offers excellent anatomical visualization [53], but because of its high cost and the higher radiation exposure, it is reserved for complicated cases [18].
Lymphadenopathy is the most common abnormality noted in children with primary tuberculosis [13], but it is not pathognomonic of tuberculosis because other infectious processes can present with lymphadenopathy. Large pulmonary vessels are sometimes erroneously identified as lymph nodes, leading to over-diagnosis. The inter-observer agreement is low (kappa −0.03 to 0.25) [5]. Knowledge and familiarization of the hilar anatomy are prerequisites prior to interpretation [52].
The abnormalities seen on chest radiographs resolve gradually and can worsen despite clinical improvement. Lymphadenopathy and parenchymal disease without or with calcifications can also persist for many months and even years even after proper treatment. Re-treatment might not be necessary, especially if the child is asymptomatic. Moreover, the calcifications do not equate with healed tuberculosis because these can indicate latency [52].
Conclusion
Radiologic interpretation of pulmonary tuberculosis remains challenging. Classically, tuberculosis is classified as primary and post-primary tuberculosis, but the typical radiologic patterns are now complicated by overlapping imaging characteristics as well as occurrence of atypical features seen in immunocompromised children. It is important to differentiate infection and disease because treatments are different. The proposed standardized clinical and radiographic classification presented in this paper aims to provide helpful guides in the proper nomenclature of suspected tuberculosis patients. The pitfalls and limitations of imaging likewise caution both clinicians and radiologists to avoid erroneous interpretations and over-diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis.
References
Marais BJ, Gie RP, Simon Schaaf H et al (2004) A proposed radiological classification of childhood intra-thoracic tuberculosis. Pediatr Radiol 34:886–894
Van Dyck J, Vanhoenacker FM, Van den Brande P et al (2003) Imaging of pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur Radiol 13:1771–1785
Graham SM, Ahmed T, Amanullah F et al (2012) Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children: 1. Proposed clinical case definitions for classification of intrathoracic tuberculosis disease. Consensus from an expert panel. J Infect Dis 205:S199–S208
Moyo S, Verver S, Hawkridge A et al (2012) Tuberculosis case finding for vaccine trials in young children in high-incidence settings: a randomized trial. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 16:185–191
Triasih R, Robertson C, De campo J et al (2015) An evaluation of chest x-ray in the context of community-based screening of child tuberculosis contacts. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 19:1428–1434
Wang XW, Pappoe F, Huang Y et al (2015) Xpert MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in children: a meta-analysis. Clin Lab 61:1775–1785
Ardizzoni E, Fajardo E, Saranchuk P et al (2015) Implementing the Xpert1MTB/RIF diagnostic test for tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: outcomes and lessons learned in 18 countries. PLoS One 10:e0144656
World Health Organization (2013) Automated real-time nucleic acid amplification technology for rapid and simultaneous detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB in adults and children: policy update. World Health Organization, Geneva
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) TB treatment for children https://www.cdc.gov/tb/topic/treatment/children.htm. Accessed 9 Jan 2017
Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N et al (2016) Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines: treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 63:e147–e195
Lu-Fong MT, How CH, Bañez MAP et al (2003) Philippine pediatric Society handbook on childhood tuberculosis. Quezon City, Philippines
Goodwin RA, Des Prez RM (1983) Apical localization of pulmonary tuberculosis, chronic pulmonary histoplasmosis and progressive massive fibrosis of the lung. Chest 83:801–805
Leung AN, Muller NL, Pineda PR et al (1992) Primary tuberculosis in childhood: radiographic manifestations. Radiology 182:87–91
Agrons GA, Markowitz RI, Kramer SS et al (1993) Pulmonary tuberculosis in children. Semin Roentgenol 28:158–172
Miller WT, Miller WT Jr (1993) Tuberculosis in the normal host: radiological findings. Semin Roentgenol 28:109–118
Leung AN (1999) Pulmonary tuberculosis: the essentials. Radiology 210:307–322
Kim WS, Choi J II, Kim I-O et al (2006) Pulmonary tuberculosis in infants: radiographic and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1024–1033
Perez-Velez CM, Marais BJ (2012) Tuberculosis in children. N Engl J Med 367:348–361
Lincoln EM, Sewell EM (1963) Tuberculosis in children. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1–315
Wallgren A (1948) The time-table of tuberculosis. Tubercle 29:245–251
Lamont AC, Cremin BJ, Pelteret RM et al (1986) Radiological patterns of pulmonary tuberculosis in the paediatric age group. Pediatr Radiol 16:2–7
Andronikou S, Joseph E, Lucas S et al (2004) CT scanning for the detection of tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Radiol 34:232–236
Lee KS, Song KS, Lim TH et al (1993) Adult-onset pulmonary tuberculosis: findings on chest radiographs and CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:753–758
McAdams HP, Erasmus J, Winter JA et al (1995) Radiologic manifestations of pulmonary tuberculosis. Radiol Clin N Am 33:655–678
Sanchez MO, Mendoza AR, Laya BF et al (2011) Primary progressive tuberculosis in children: radiographic patterns in correlation with clinical presentation and microbiologic studies. St. Luke’s J Med 7:59–68
Griffith-Richards SB, Goussard P, Andronikou S et al (2007) Cavitating pulmonary tuberculosis in children: correlating radiology with pathogenesis. Pediatr Radiol 37:798–804
Kim WS, Moon WK, Kim IO et al (1997) Pulmonary tuberculosis in children: CT evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1005–1009
Pulido KGC, Laya BF, Villamor CP et al (2011) Radiographic patterns of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease in Filipino pediatric patients and their correlation with symptoms, length of hospital confinement and clinical dispositions. St. Luke’s J Med 7:21–32
Tuddenham WJ (1984) Glossary of terms of thoracic radiology: recommendations of the nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:509–517
Kwong JS, Carignan S, Kang EY et al (1996) Miliary tuberculosis: diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography. Chest 110:339–342
Lee KS, Kim YH, Kim WS et al (1991) Endobronchial tuberculosis: CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:424–428
Weber AL, Bird KT, Janower ML et al (1968) Primary tuberculosis in childhood with particular emphasis on changes affecting the tracheobronchial tree. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy, Nucl Med 103:123–132
Laya BF, Concepcion NDP, De la Eva RC et al (2011) Computed tomography with multiplanar reformation and 3D-volume rendering technique in correlation with fiberoptic tracheobronchoscopy for thoracic evaluation of children with primary progressive tuberculosis and tracheobronchial involvement. St Luke’s J Med 7:11–20
Kashyap S, Mohapatra PR, Saini V et al (2003) Endobronchial tuberculosis. Indian J Chest Dis Allied 45:247–256
Daly JF, Brown DS, Lincoln EM et al (1952) Endobronchial tuberculosis in children. Dis Chest 22:380–398
Smith LS, Schillaci RF, Sarlin RF et al (1987) Endobronchial tuberculosis: serial fiberoptic bronchoscopy and natural history. Chest 91:649–657
Lucas S, Andronikou S, Goussard P et al (2012) CT features of lymphobronchial tuberculosis in children, including complications and associated abnormalities. Pediatr Radiol 42:923–931
Moon WK, Im JG, Yeon KM et al (1997) Tuberculosis of central airways: CT findings of active and fibrotic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:649–653
Choyke PL, Sostman HD, Curtis AM et al (1983) Adult-onset pulmonary tuberculosis. Radiology 148:357–362
Yilmaz MU, Kumcuoglu Z, Utkaner G et al (1998) CT findings of tuberculous pleurisy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2:164–167
Woodring JH, Vandiviere HM, Fried AM et al (1986) Update: radiographic features of pulmonary tuberculosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:497–506
Glicklich M, Mendelson DS, Gendal ES et al (1990) Tuberculous empyema necessitatis: CT findings. Clin Imaging 14:23–25
Kim Y, Song KS, Goo JM et al (2001) Thoracic sequelae and complications of tuberculosis. Radiographics 21:839–858
Palmer PE (1979) Pulmonary tuberculosis: usual and unusual radiographic presentations. Semin Roentgenol 14:204–242
Im JG, Webb WR, Han MC et al (1991) Apical opacity associated with pulmonary tuberculosis: high-resolution CT findings. Radiology 178:727–731
Van den Brande P, Demedts M (1992) Pulmonary tuberculosis in the elderly: diagnostic difficulties. Eur J Med 1:224–229
Winer-Muram HT, Rubin SA (1990) Thoracic complications of tuberculosis. J Thorac Imaging 5:46–63
Hadlock FP, Park SK, Awe RJ et al (1980) Unusual radiographic findings in adult pulmonary tuberculosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 134:1015–1018
Im JG, Itoh H, Shim YS et al (1993) Pulmonary tuberculosis: CT findings — early active disease and sequential change with antituberculous therapy. Radiology 186:653–660
Sochocky S (1958) Tuberculoma of the lung. Am Rev Tuberc 78:403–410
De Villiers RVP, Andronikou S, Van de Westhuizen S et al (2004) Specificity and sensitivity of chest radiographs in the diagnosis of paediatric pulmonary tuberculosis and the value of additional high-kilovolt radiographs. Australas Radiol 48:148–153
Laya BF (2011) Thoracic tuberculosis in children: pitfalls and dilemma in chest radiograph interpretation. St. Luke’s J Med 7:69–76
Andronikou S, van Hoenacker FM, de Backer AI et al (2009) Advances in imaging chest tuberculosis: blurring of differences between children and adults. Clin Chest Med 30:717–744
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Concepcion, N.D.P., Laya, B.F., Andronikou, S. et al. Standardized radiographic interpretation of thoracic tuberculosis in children. Pediatr Radiol 47, 1237–1248 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3868-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3868-z