Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of missed appointments in patients referred for congenital or pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Congenital cardiac magnetic resonance is a limited resource because of scanner and physician availability. Missed appointments decrease scheduling efficiency, have financial implications and represent missed care opportunities.

Objective

To characterize the rate of missed appointments and identify modifiable predictors.

Materials and methods

This single-center retrospective study included all patients with outpatient congenital or pediatric cardiac MR appointments from Jan. 1, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2015. We identified missed appointments (no-shows or same-day cancellations) from the electronic medical record. We obtained demographic and clinical factors from the medical record and assessed socioeconomic factors by U.S. Census block data by patient ZIP code. Statistically significant variables (P<0.05) were included into a multivariable analysis.

Results

Of 795 outpatients (median age 18.5 years, interquartile range 13.4–27.1 years) referred for congenital cardiac MR, a total of 91 patients (11.4%) missed appointments; 28 (3.5%) missed multiple appointments. Reason for missed appointment could be identified in only 38 patients (42%), but of these, 28 (74%) were preventable or could have been identified prior to the appointment. In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of missed appointments were referral by a non-cardiologist (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.8, P=0.0002), referral for research (AOR 3.6, P=0.01), having public insurance (AOR 2.1, P=0.004), and having scheduled cardiac MR from November to April (AOR 1.8, P=0.01).

Conclusion

Demographic factors can identify patients at higher risk for missing appointments. These data may inform initiatives to limit missed appointments, such as targeted education of referring providers and patients. Further data are needed to evaluate the efficacy of potential interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valente AM, Cook S, Festa P et al (2014) Multimodality imaging guidelines for patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society for Pediatric Radiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:111–141

  2. Cohen MS, Eidem BW, Cetta F et al (2016) Multimodality imaging guidelines of patients with transposition of the great arteries: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29:571–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM et al (2008) ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation 118:2395–2451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kramer CM, Hundley WG, Kwong RY et al (2015) COCATS 4 task force 8: training in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:1822–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fratz S, Chung T, Greil GF et al (2013) Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wessman BV, Moriarity AK, Ametlli V et al (2014) Reducing barriers to timely MR imaging scheduling. Radiographics 34:2064–2070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman AS, Matlow A, Shroff M et al (2015) Factors impacting same-day cancellation of outpatient pediatric magnetic resonance imaging under anesthesia. Pediatr Radiol 45:99–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Norbash A, Yucel K, Yuh W et al (2016) Effect of team training on improving MRI study completion rates and no-show rates. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:1040–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. AlRowaili MO, Ahmed AE, Areabi HA (2016) Factors associated with no-shows and rescheduling MRI appointments. BMC Health Serv Res 16:679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan-Lewis E, Percac-Lima S (2013) No-show to primary care appointments: why patients do not come. J Prim Care Community Health 4:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Massin MM, Astadicko I, Dessy H (2007) Noncardiac comorbidities of congenital heart disease in children. Acta Paediatr 96:753–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeung E, Kay J, Roosevelt GE et al (2008) Lapse of care as a predictor for morbidity in adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 125:62–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heery E, Sheehan AM, While AE et al (2015) Experiences and outcomes of transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young people with congenital heart disease: a systematic review. Congenit Heart Dis 10:413–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luthy SK, Yu S, Donohue JE et al (2016) Parental preferences regarding outpatient management of children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 37:151–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Recht M, Macari M, Lawson K et al (2013) Impacting key performance indicators in an academic MR imaging department through process improvement. J Am Coll Radiol 10:202–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah SJ, Cronin P, Hong CS et al (2016) Targeted reminder phone calls to patients at high risk of no-show for primary care appointment: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 31:1460–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Katrice Yarrington, who performed the initial search of the electronic medical record for missed appointments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jimmy C . Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, J.C..., Lowery, R., Yu, S. et al. Predictors of missed appointments in patients referred for congenital or pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance. Pediatr Radiol 47, 911–916 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3851-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3851-8

Keywords

Navigation