Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging 4-D flow-based analysis of aortic hemodynamics in Turner syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular surveillance is important in Turner syndrome because of the increased risk of aortic dilation and dissection with consecutively increased mortality.

Objective

To compare 4-D flow MRI for the characterization of aortic 3-D flow patterns, dimensions and vessel wall parameters in pediatric patients with Turner syndrome and age-matched controls.

Materials and methods

We performed 4-D flow MRI measuring in vivo 3-D blood flow with coverage of the thoracic aorta in 25 patients with Turner syndrome and in 16 female healthy controls (age mean ± standard deviation were 16 ± 5 years and 17 ± 4 years, respectively). Blood flow was visualized by time-resolved 3-D path lines. Visual grading of aortic flow in terms of helices and vortices was performed by two independent observers. Quantitative analysis included measurement of aortic diameters, quantification of peak systolic wall shear stress, pulsatility index and oscillatory shear index at eight defined sites.

Results

Patients with Turner syndrome had significantly larger aortic diameters normalized to BSA, increased vortices in the ascending aorta and elevated helix flow in the ascending and descending aorta compared to controls (all P<0.03). Patients with abnormal helical or vortical flow in the ascending aorta had significantly larger diameters of the ascending aorta (P<0.03). Peak systolic wall shear stress, pulsatility index and oscillatory shear index were significantly lower in Turner patients compared to controls (p=0.02, p=0.002 and p=0.01 respectively).

Conclusion

Four-dimensional flow MRI provides new insights into the altered aortic hemodynamics and wall shear stress that could have an impact on the development of aortic dissections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford CE, Jones KW, Polani PE et al (1959) A sex-chromosome anomaly in a case of gonadal dysgenesis (Turner’s syndrome). Lancet 1:711–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemli L, Smith DW (1963) The X0 syndrome. A study of the differentiated phenotype in 25 patients. J Pediatr 63:577–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ho VB, Bakalov VK, Cooley M et al (2004) Major vascular anomalies in Turner syndrome: prevalence and magnetic resonance angiographic features. Circulation 110:1694–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutmark-Little I, Prahl Wittberg L, van Wyk S, Backeljauw P (2013) Aortic blood flow characteristics in Turner syndrome. Endocr Rev 34(3)

  5. Gutmark-Little I, Backeljauw PF (2013) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in Turner syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 78:646–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mortensen KH, Hjerrild BE, Andersen NH et al (2010) Abnormalities of the major intrathoracic arteries in Turner syndrome as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiol Young 20:191–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olivieri LJ, Baba RY, Arai AE et al (2013) Spectrum of aortic valve abnormalities associated with aortic dilation across age groups in Turner syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1018–1023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Matura LA, Ho VB, Rosing DR et al (2007) Aortic dilatation and dissection in Turner syndrome. Circulation 116:1663–1670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boileau C, Guo D, Hanna N et al (2012) TGFB2 mutations cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections associated with mild systemic features of Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet 44:916–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Loeys BL, Schwarze U, Holm T et al (2006) Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-beta receptor. N Engl J Med 355:788–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cameron D (2015) Surgery for congenital diseases of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149:S14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smiley DA, Khalil RA (2009) Estrogenic compounds, estrogen receptors and vascular cell signaling in the aging blood vessels. Curr Med Chem 16:1863–1887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baguet JP, Douchin S, Pierre H et al (2005) Structural and functional abnormalities of large arteries in the Turner syndrome. Heart 91:1442–1446

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson M, Airhart N, Lopez L et al (2012) Moderate aortic enlargement and bicuspid aortic valve are associated with aortic dissection in Turner syndrome: report of the international Turner syndrome aortic dissection registry. Circulation 126:2220–2226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bondy CA (2007) Care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:10–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gravholt CH, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Stochholm K et al (2006) Clinical and epidemiological description of aortic dissection in Turner’s syndrome. Cardiol Young 16:430–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Turtle EJ, Sule AA, Bath LE et al (2013) Assessing and addressing cardiovascular risk in adults with Turner syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 78:639–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ostberg JE, Brookes JA, McCarthy C et al (2004) A comparison of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging in cardiovascular screening of adults with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5966–5971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dulac Y, Pienkowski C, Abadir S et al (2008) Cardiovascular abnormalities in Turner’s syndrome: what prevention? Arch Cardiovasc Dis 101:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HK, Gottliebson W, Hor K et al (2011) Cardiovascular anomalies in Turner syndrome: spectrum, prevalence, and cardiac MRI findings in a pediatric and young adult population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:454–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen BD, van Ooij P, Barker AJ et al (2015) Thoracic aorta 3D hemodynamics in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:954–963

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK et al (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 255:53–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barker AJ, Markl M, Bürk J et al (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:457–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Geiger J, Arnold R, Herzer L et al (2012) Aortic wall shear stress in Marfan syndrome. Magn Reson Med 70:1137–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Geiger J, Markl M, Herzer L et al (2012) Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:594–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Frydrychowicz A, Arnold R, Hirtler D et al (2008) Multidirectional flow analysis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in aneurysm development following repair of aortic coarctation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bieging ET, Frydrychowicz A, Wentland A et al (2011) In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:589–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bürk J, Blanke P, Stankovic Z et al (2012) Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF, Russe MF et al (2009) Three-dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A (2011) Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:988–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Back M, Gasser TC, Michel J et al (2013) Biomechanical factors in the biology of aortic wall and aortic valve diseases. Cardiovasc Res 99:232–241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pasta S, Rinaudo A, Luca A et al (2013) Difference in hemodynamic and wall stress of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. J Biomech 46:1729–1738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Markl M, Harloff A, Bley TA et al (2007) Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:824–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bock J, Kreher BW, Hennig J, Markl M (2007) Optimized pre-processing of time-resolved 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI data. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 15. http://cds.ismrm.org/ismrm-2007/files/03138.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016

  35. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A et al (2008) Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 60:1218–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaiser T, Kellenberger CJ, Albisetti M et al (2008) Normal values for aortic diameters in children and adolescents — assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced CMR-angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bondy CA (2008) Congenital cardiovascular disease in Turner syndrome. Congenit Heart Dis 3:2–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Marin A, Weir-McCall JR, Webb DJ et al (2015) Imaging of cardiovascular risk in patients with Turner’s syndrome. Clin Radiol 70:803–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Stochholm K, Juul S, Juel K et al (2006) Prevalence, incidence, diagnostic delay, and mortality in Turner’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3897–3902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD et al (2008) Mortality in women with Turner syndrome in Great Britain: a national cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:4735–4742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cleemann L, Mortensen KH, Holm K et al (2010) Aortic dimensions in girls and young women with Turner syndrome: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Pediatr Cardiol 31:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mortensen KH, Erlandsen M, Andersen NH et al (2013) Prediction of aortic dilation in Turner syndrome — enhancing the use of serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:47

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hope TA, Markl M, Wigström L et al (2007) Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1471–1479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S et al (2012) 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:1015–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Frydrychowicz A, Berger A, Munoz Del Rio A et al (2012) Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla. Eur Radiol 22:1122–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sharma J, Friedman D, Dave-Sharma S et al (2009) Aortic distensibility and dilation in Turner’s syndrome. Cardiol Young 19:568–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Musunuru K (2012) Transforming growth factor β2 mutations and familial thoracic aortic aneurysms. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 5:593–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou J, Arepalli S, Cheng CM et al (2012) Perturbation of the transforming growth factor β system in Turner syndrome. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 44:720–724

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Raoul Arnold and Marie Neu have contributed equally to this work and are both first authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raoul Arnold.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Markl receives funding from the National Institutes of Health (grant number R01HL115828).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arnold, R., Neu, M., Hirtler, D. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging 4-D flow-based analysis of aortic hemodynamics in Turner syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 47, 382–390 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3767-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3767-8

Keywords

Navigation