Abstract
Background
Alagille syndrome is a rare disorder commonly associated with pulmonary artery stenosis. Studies exist discussing the cardiovascular sequela but no consistent phenotype, or pattern of pulmonary artery stenosis, has been described.
Objective
The objective of this study was to characterize the distribution and severity of pulmonary artery stenosis in patients with Alagille syndrome based on computed tomography angiography.
Materials and methods
A retrospective chart review identified patients with Alagille syndrome who had undergone CT angiography. Pulmonary trunk (MPA), left main pulmonary artery (LPA) and right main pulmonary artery (RPA) diameters in Alagille patients were compared with those from matched control subjects. Stenoses at lobar and segmental pulmonary arteries were categorized as: Grade 1 (<33% stenosis), Grade 2 (33-66% stenosis) or Grade 3 (>66% stenosis). Involvement among the different lung regions was then compared.
Results
Fifteen patients ages 6 months to 17 years were identified; one had surgical augmentation of the central pulmonary arteries and was excluded from the central (main, right and left) pulmonary artery analysis. The proximal LPA and RPA, but not the MPA, were significantly smaller than those of the control subjects (P<0.01). The proximal LPA was significantly smaller than the proximal RPA (P<0.01) in the Alagille group (0.55 LPA:RPA ratio). Within the Alagille group, 75% of the lobar and segmental branches showed mild or no stenoses (Grade 1), 17% showed moderate stenosis (Grade 2) and 8% showed severe stenosis (Grade 3). While not statistically significant, the right lung demonstrated a greater percentage of Grades 2 and 3 stenoses (28%, right vs. 20% left, P=0.1). The right middle and lingula lobes of both lungs showed more Grade 2 and 3 stenoses (33% upper/middle vs. 18% lower, P<0.01).
Conclusion
We describe a common pattern pulmonary artery stenosis in Alagille patients consisting of severe proximal LPA stenosis, heavy involvement of the lobar and segmental branches (more often right than left), and a greater involvement of the upper lobes. Knowledge of this phenotypic pattern can help in the diagnosis of Alagille syndrome in patients presenting with pulmonary artery stenosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. MIM Number: 118450: 1/30/2014. World Wide Web URL: http://omim.org/
Crosnier C, Attié-Bitach T, Encha-Razavi F et al (2004) JAGGED1 gene expression during human embryogenesis elucidates the wide phenotypic spectrum of Alagille syndrome. Hepatology 32:574–581
McElhinney DB, Krantz ID, Bason L et al (2002) Analysis of cardiovascular phenotype and genotype–phenotype correlation in individuals with a JAG1 mutation and/or Alagille syndrome. Circulation 106:2567–2574
Alagille D, Estrada A, Hadchouel M et al (1987) Syndromic paucity of interlobular bile ducts (Alagille syndrome or arteriohepatic dysplasia): review of 80 cases. J Pediatr 110:195–200
Kamath BM, Bason L, Piccoli DA et al (2003) Consequences of JAG1 mutations. J Med Genet 40:891–895
Oda T, Elkahloun AG, Pike BL et al (1997) Mutations in the human Jagged1 gene are responsible for Alagille syndrome. Nat Genet 16:235–242
Emerick KM, Rand EB, Goldmuntz E et al (1999) Features of Alagille syndrome in 92 patients: frequency and relation to prognosis. Hepatology 29:822–829
Tzakis AG, Reyes J, Tepetes K et al (1993) Liver transplantation for Alagille’s syndrome. Arch Surg 128:337–339
Bauer RC, Laney AO, Smith R et al (2010) Jagged1 (JAG1) mutations in patients with tetralogy of Fallot or pulmonic stenosis. Hum Mutat 31:594–601
Kamath BM, Spinner NB, Emerick KM et al (2004) Vascular anomalies in Alagille syndrome a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Circulation 109:1354–1358
Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166
Boone J, Strauss K, Cody D et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT exams. Report of AAPM Task Group 204
Sluysmans T, Colan SD (2009) Structural measurements and adjustment for growth. In: Lai WW, Cohen MS, Geva T, Mertens L (eds) Echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK, pp 53–63
Morrow D, Guha S, Sweeney C et al (2008) Notch and vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype. Circ Res 103:1370–1382
Tricarico F, Hlavacek AM, Schoepf UJ et al (2013) Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques. Eur Radiol 23:1306–1315
Mayo J, Thakur Y (2013) Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:522–528
Nawaz A, Litt HI, Stavropoulos SW et al (2008) Digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography versus multidetector CT in the detection of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1582–1588
Chandrashekhar G, Sodhi KS, Saxena AK et al (2012) Correlation of 64 row MDCT, echocardiography and cardiac catheterization angiography in assessment of pulmonary arterial anatomy in children with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Eur J Radiol 81:4211–4217
Lee EY, Jenkins KJ, Muneeb M et al (2013) Proximal pulmonary vein stenosis detection in pediatric patients: value of multiplanar and 3-D VR imaging evaluation. Pediatr Radiol 43:929–936
Monge MC, Mainwaring RD, Sheikh AY et al (2013) Surgical reconstruction of peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis in Williams and Alagille syndromes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:476–481
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodriguez, R.M., Feinstein, J.A. & Chan, F.P. CT-defined phenotype of pulmonary artery stenoses in Alagille syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 46, 1120–1127 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3580-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3580-4