Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deciding why and when to use CT in children: a radiologist’s perspective

  • Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defining what is appropriate or inappropriate with respect to CT scanning is challenging. There are a variety of influences on scan utilization in children, some more widely recognized and acknowledged than others. It is important to understand the contribution of these elements as we move toward improved utilization. This must be through partnerships and shared efforts and accountability. These efforts include improved resources such as consensus appropriateness criteria and guidelines including decision rules and support. But there also need to be trench-based strategies on the part of practicing radiologists to model cooperative behavior rather than blame-centered behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slovis TL, Berdon WE (2002) Panel discussion. Pediatr Radiol 32:242–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cascade PN, Webster EW, Kazerooni EA (1998) Ineffective use of radiology: the hidden cost. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:561–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Venkatesh AK, Kline JA, Courtney DM (2012) Evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department and consistency with a national quality measure: quantifying the opportunity for improvement. Arch Intern Med 172:1028–1032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Frush DP, Applegate K (2004) Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. J Am Coll Radiol 1:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dorfman AL, Fazel R, Einstein AJ et al (2011) Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 165:458–464

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sierzenski P, Brink J, Amis ES et al (2014) Application of justification and optimization in medical imaging: examples of clinical guidance for computed tomography use in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 63:25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Linscott LL, Kessler MM, Kitchen DR et al (2002) CT for pediatric, acute, minor head trauma: clinician conformity to published guidelines. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1252–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ABIM Foundation, ACP–ASIM Foundation, European Federation of Internal Medicine (2002) Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 136:243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ et al (2011) Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258:889–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Radiology (2013) ACR developing standards to support USPSTF recommended CT lung cancer screening programs. http://www.acr.org/about-us/media-center/press-releases/2013-press-releases/acr-developing-standards-to-support-uspstf-recommended-ct-lung-cancer-screening-programs. Accessed 2 Feb 2014

  11. American College of Radiology (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria. Accessed 2 Feb 2014

  12. American College of Radiology (2013) Practice guidelines and technical standards.http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Standards-Guidelines. Accessed 2 Feb 2014

  13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2014) National Guideline Clearinghouse http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guideline.gov%2F&ei=knXtUpGLB4WCyQGsi4DICQ&usg=AFQjCNFFnQCjAILj74mtVKsU7EMBpX3EeQ. Accessed 2 Feb 2014

  14. Williams CH, Frush DP (2012) Compendium of national guidelines for imaging of the pediatric patient. Pediatr Radiol 42:82–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SI, Krishnaraj A, Chatterji M et al (2012) When does a radiologist's recommendation for follow-up result in high-cost imaging? Radiology 262:544–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frush DP, Frush KS, Oldham KT (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S.or US versus CT? A North American perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:500–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Joynt KE, Le ST, Orav EJ et al (2014) Compensation of chief executive officers at nonprofit U.S. hospitals. JAMA Intern Med 174:61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L et al (2008) Ownership or leasing of CT scanners by nonradiologist physicians: a rapidly growing trend that raises concern about self-referral. J Am Coll Radiol 5:1206–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levin DC, Rao VM (2011) The effect of self-referral on utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:848–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Hughes DR (2011) Clarifying the relationship between nonradiologists’ financial interest in imaging and their utilization of imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W891–W899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hryhorczuk AL, Mannix RC, Taylor GA (2012) Pediatric abdominal pain: use of imaging in the emergency department in the United States from 1999 to 2007. Radiology 263:778–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM et al (2005) Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 293:2609–2617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Massachusetts Medical Society (2008) Investigation of defensive medicine in Massachusetts. Informational Report 1-08-02 November 2008. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCgQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.massmed.org%2Fdefensivemedicine%2F&ei=EnztUtbIE4XYyQHU2YCgDg&usg=AFQjCNHfcXfugPmSSyw4Wz6oi9HrPlRMzg&bvm=bv.60444564,d.aWc. Accessed 2 Feb 2014

  24. Bogdanich W (2011) West Virginia hospital overradiated brain scan patients, records show. The New York Times, 5 Mar 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/06/health/06radiation.html?_r=1. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

  25. Bogdanich W, McGinty JC (2010) Radiation worries for children in dentist’s chairs. The New York Times. 22 Nov 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/us/23scan.html?_r=1&pagewanted=allNY. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

  26. Bogdanich W (2009) Radiation overdoses point up dangers of CT scans. The New York Times, 15 Oct 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/us/16radiation.html?_r=1. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

  27. Redberg RF, Smith-Bindman R (2013) We are giving ourselves cancer. The New York Times (opinion page). http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/31/opinion/we-are-giving-ourselves-cancer.html?_r=0. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

  28. Lu MT, Tellis WM, Fidelman N et al (2012) Reducing the rate of repeat imaging: import of outside images to PACS. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:628–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP et al (2010) Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology 257:240–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boland GW, Thrall JH, Gazelle GS et al (2011) Decision support for radiologist report recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol 8:819–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Frush has no financial interests, investigational or off-label uses to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald P. Frush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frush, D.P. Deciding why and when to use CT in children: a radiologist’s perspective. Pediatr Radiol 44 (Suppl 3), 404–408 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3016-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3016-y

Keywords

Navigation