Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of bismuth breast shields in conjunction with automatic tube current modulation in CT imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are mechanisms within CT scanners and shielding that can be used to lower dose to patients.

Objective

The objective of our study was to evaluate the dose changes and image quality with and without a breast shield for multidetector CT of the chest with angular tube current modulation.

Materials and methods

An anthropomorphic 5-year-old phantom was scanned with and without bismuth breast shielding and with and without angular tube current modulation. Image quality was assessed by measuring signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio as well as measuring qualitatively. ANOVA single-factor p-value analysis of paired datasets was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

The breast shielding and angular tube current modulation resulted in a dose reduction to 85% for the breast and 90% overall. Although no qualitative differences were noted with and without the breast shielding used with angular tube current modulation, there were statistically significant differences in the contrast-to-noise ratio and CT numbers.

Conclusions

When used with angular tube current modulation, breast shields influence the contrast-to-noise ratio and CT numbers, and therefore should not be used for chest CT. Greater dose reduction can be obtained by reducing the reference mAs (or reference noise index).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts & figures 2012. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

  2. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Reiman RE et al (2006) Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1718–1722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostroumova E, Preston DL, Ron E et al (2008) Breast cancer incidence following low-dose rate environmental exposure: Techa River Cohort, 1956–2004. Br J Cancer 99:1940–1945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP et al (2003) In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:407–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL et al (2003) Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 228:15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aldrich JE, Chang SD, Bilawich AM et al (2006) Radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography: the role of patient size and the selection of tube current. Can Assoc Radiol J 57:152–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Angel E, Yaghmai N, Jude CM et al (2009) Dose to radiosensitive organs during routine chest CT: effects of tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1340–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colombo P, Pedroli G, Nicoloso M et al (2004) Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth shield during CT examinations. Radiol Med 108:560–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diederich S, Lenzen H (2000) Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and computed tomography techniques. Cancer 89:2457–2460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heaney DE, Norvill CA (2006) A comparison of reduction in CT dose through the use of gantry angulations or bismuth shields. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 29:172–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hohl C, Wildberger JE, Suss C et al (2006) Radiation dose reduction to breast and thyroid during MDCT: effectiveness of an in-plane bismuth shield. Acta Radiol 47:562–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCollough CH (2008) CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce. Health Phys 95:508–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Preston DL, Mattsson A, Holmberg E et al (2002) Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: a pooled analysis of eight cohorts. Radiat Res 158:220–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hrubec Z, Boice JD Jr, Monson RR et al (1989) Breast cancer after multiple chest fluoroscopies: second follow-up of Massachusetts women with tuberculosis. Cancer Res 49:229–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis FG, Boice JD Jr, Hrubec Z et al (1989) Cancer mortality in a radiation-exposed cohort of Massachusetts tuberculosis patients. Cancer Res 49:6130–6136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boice JD Jr (2001) Radiation and breast carcinogenesis. Med Pediatr Oncol 36:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yilmaz MH, Albayram S, Yasar D et al (2007) Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:138–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME et al (1997) The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT–shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology 205:853–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalra MK, Dang P, Singh S et al (2009) In-plane shielding for CT: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance. Korean J Radiol 10:156–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vollmar SV, Kalender WA (2009) Reduction of dose to the female breast as a result of spectral optimisation for high-contrast thoracic CT imaging: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 82:920–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA et al (2011) Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current. Med Phys 38:6084–6092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2003) Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:331–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coursey C, Frush DP, Yoshizumi T et al (2008) Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W54–W61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Geleijns J, Want J, McCollough C (2010) The use of breast shielding for dose reduction in pediatric CT: arguments against the proposition. Pediatr Radiol 40:1744–1747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Geleijns J, Salvado Artells M, Veldkamp WJ et al (2006) Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 16:2334–2340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leswick DA, Hunt MM, Webster ST et al (2008) Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT. Radiology 249:572–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA et al (2012) Bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and global reduction of tube current for dose reduction to the eye at head CT. Radiology 262:191–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2012) Use of bismuth shielding for the purpose of dose reduction in CT scanning. AAPM, College Park

  31. Siemens Healthcare (2010) Guide to low dose. Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Sabah Servaes & Xiaowei Zhu

Authors
  1. Sabah Servaes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaowei Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabah Servaes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Servaes, S., Zhu, X. The effects of bismuth breast shields in conjunction with automatic tube current modulation in CT imaging. Pediatr Radiol 43, 1287–1294 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2687-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2687-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation