Skip to main content
Log in

MRI findings in patients with defecatory dysfunction after surgical correction of anorectal malformation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative anorectal malformation patients frequently have defecatory dysfunction. MRI may be useful in the management of these patients.

Objective

To analyze static and dynamic MRI findings in patients with defecatory dysfunction after correction of anorectal malformation (ARM), and compare differences between patients with constipation and fecal incontinence.

Materials and methods

Pelvic MRI studies of 20 constipated and 32 incontinent postoperative ARM patients were analyzed retrospectively to determine the location and morphology of the neorectum, presence of peritoneal fat herniation, presence of scarring, development of the striated muscle complex (SMC) and any other abnormalities. The two groups were then compared using χ 2-test. Eighteen patients also underwent MRI defecography to evaluate pelvic floor function and abnormalities are reported.

Results

The children with incontinence were more likely to have abnormal location of the neorectum (P = 0.031), increased anorectal angle (ARA) (P = 0.031) and peritoneal fat herniation (P = 0.032), and less likely to have dilation of the neorectum (P = 0.027), than the children with constipation. There were no significant differences between the two groups in incidence of focal stenosis of the neorectum (P = 0.797), presence of extensive scarring (P = 0.591) and developmental agenesis of the SMC (P > 0.05). MRI defecography showed 6 anterior rectoceles, 6 cystoceles and 18 pelvic floor descents.

Conclusions

MRI is a helpful imaging modality in postoperative ARM patients with defecatory dysfunction, and it shows distinct differences between the children with constipation and incontinence and provides individualized information to guide further treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG (2001) Fecal continence in patients having undergone posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure for a high anorectal malformation improves at adolescence, as constipation disappears. J Pediatr Surg 36:1218–1221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boemers TM, Ludwikowski B, Forstner R et al (2006) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in children and adolescents with vesical and anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 41:1267–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McHugh K (1998) The role of radiology in children with anorectal anomalies; with particular emphasis on MRI. Eur J Radiol 26:194–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eltomey MA, Donnelly LF, Emery KH et al (2008) Postoperative pelvic MRI of anorectal malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1469–1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang DY, Qiu XH, Li L (1999) Morphological study of puborectalis and anal sphincter in anorectal anomaly with CT. Chin J Pediatr Surg 20:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  6. deVries PA, Cox KL (1985) Surgery of anorectal anomalies. Surg Clin North Am 65:1139–1169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. EI Sayed RF, EI Mashed SM, Farag A et al (2008) Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysis of static and dynamic MR imaging findings. Radiology 248:518–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levitt MA, Pena A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:33–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoker J (2009) Anorectal and pelvic floor anatomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 23:463–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goei R (1990) Anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders and asymptomatic subjects: evaluation with defecography. Radiology 174:121–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bajwa A, Emmanuel A (2009) The physiology of continence and evacuation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 23:477–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG et al (2004) Fecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubora M, Suita A (2002) Assessment of sphincter muscle function before and after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty using a magnetic spinal stimulation technique. J Pediatr Surg 37:617–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nievelstein RA, Vos A, Valk J et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging in children with anorectal malformations: embryologic implications. J Pediatr Surg 37:1138–1145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McHugh K, Dudley NE, Tam P (1995) Preoperative MRI of anorectal anomalies in the newborn period. Pediatr Radiol 25:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fukuya T, Honda H, Kubota M et al (1993) Postoperative MRI evaluation of anorectal malformation with clinical correlation. Pediatr Radiol 25:583–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fynes MM, Marshall K, Cassidy M et al (1999) A prospective, randomized study comparing the effect of augmented biofeedback with sensory biofeedback alone on fecal incontinence after obstetric trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 42:753–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, NO. ZR2010HL055.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao Guang-rui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yong, C., Ruo-yi, W., Yuan, Z. et al. MRI findings in patients with defecatory dysfunction after surgical correction of anorectal malformation. Pediatr Radiol 43, 964–970 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2639-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2639-8

Keywords

Navigation