Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of headphones on sevoflurane requirement for MRI

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acoustic noise may have adverse effects, even in patients under general anesthetic.

Objective

We aimed to determine the effect of headphones on sevoflurane requirements in children undergoing general anesthesia for an MRI scan.

Materials and methods

Children scheduled for MRI were enrolled in the study. Sevoflurane was used for general anesthesia in all children. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, one to wear headphones and the other none. After reaching a predetermined end-tidal concentration, the MRI scan was initiated, and the patient was evaluated by an observer blinded to the concentration of sevoflurane. Awakening was defined as eye opening, onset of continued purposeful movement or phonation. Using the Dixon up-and-down method, each target concentration was determined by the response of the previous child in the same group.

Results

The study included 28 children undergoing MRI. There was a significant difference in ED50 between the two groups (0.92, 0.81–1.02, vs. 0.47, 0.42–0.63; P < 0.001). The times to spontaneous arm and leg movements, eye opening and discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit were significantly shorter in patients with headphones than in those without (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in times to hospital discharge (P = 0.056).

Conclusion

Noise-concealing headphones decrease inhalational anesthetic requirements and facilitate recovery. We recommend the routine use of headphones in children undergoing an MRI scan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schulte-Uentrop L, Goepfert MS (2010) Anaesthesia or sedation for MRI in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 23:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Serafini G, Zadra N (2008) Anaesthesia for MRI in the paediatric patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:499–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beauve B, Dearlove O (2008) Sedation of children under 4 weeks of age for MRI examination. Paediatr Anaesth 18:892–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hattori Y, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T (2007) Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner. Nagoya J Med Sci 69:23–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harned RK 2nd, Strain JD (2001) MRI-compatible audio/visual system: impact on pediatric sedation. Pediatr Radiol 31:247–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oğurlu M, Orhan ME, Bilgin F et al (2010) Efficacy of different concentrations of sevoflurane administered through a face mask for magnetic resonance imaging in children. Paediatr Anaesth 20:1098–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McJury M, Shellock F (2000) Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:37–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Occupational noise exposure, 29 CFR, Part 1910.95 (1988)

  9. Food and Drug Administration (1988) Magnetic resonance diagnostic device: panel recommendation and report on petitions for MR reclassification. Federal Register 53:7575–7579

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brummett RE, Talbot JM, Charubas P (1988) Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. Radiology 169:3539–3540

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quirk ME, Letendre A, Ciottone RA et al (1989) Anxiety in patients undergoing imaging. Radiology 170:463–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brennan SC, Redd WH, Jacobsen PB et al (1988) Anxiety and panic during magnetic resonance scans. Lancet 2:512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemaire C, Moran GR, Swan H (2009) Impact of audio/visual systems on pediatric sedation in magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:649–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raschle NM, Lee M, Buechler R et al (2009) Making MR imaging child’s play – pediatric neuroimaging protocol, guidelines and procedure. J Vis Exp (29),e1309. doi:10.3791/1309

  15. de Bie HM, Boersma M, Wattjes MP et al (2010) Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 169:1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson AJ, Wong A, Knottenbelt G et al (2008) MAC-awake of sevoflurane in children. Paediatr Anaesth 18:702–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hui MT, Subash S, Wang CY (2011) The 50% and 95% effective doses of desflurane for removal of the classic laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adults. Anaesthesia 66:274–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alparslan Turan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oğurlu, M., Orhan, M.E., Çinar, S. et al. Effect of headphones on sevoflurane requirement for MRI. Pediatr Radiol 42, 1432–1436 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2463-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2463-6

Keywords

Navigation