Skip to main content
Log in

Chloral hydrate sedation in radiology: retrospective audit of reduced dose

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Chloral hydrate (CH) is safe and effective for sedation of suitable children.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess whether adequate sedation is achieved with reduced CH doses.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively recorded outpatient CH sedations over 1 year. We defined standard doses of CH as 50 mg/kg (infants) and 75 mg/kg (children >1 year). A reduced dose was defined as at least 20% lower than the standard dose.

Results

In total, 653 children received CH sedation (age, 1 month–3 years 10 months), 42% were given a reduced initial dose. Augmentation dose was required in 10.9% of all children, and in a higher proportion of children >1 year (15.7%) compared to infants (5.7%; P < 0.001). Sedation was successful in 96.7%, and more frequently successful in infants (98.3%) than children >1 year (95.3%; P = 0.03). A reduced initial dose had no negative effect on outcome (P = 0.19) or time to sedation. No significant complications were seen.

Conclusion

We advocate sedation with reduced CH doses (40 mg/kg for infants; 60 mg/kg for children >1 year of age) for outpatient imaging procedures when the child is judged to be quiet or sleepy on arrival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (1992) American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 89:1110–1115

    Google Scholar 

  2. Committee on Drugs. American Academy of Pediatrics (2002) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum. Pediatrics 110:836–838

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vade A, Sukhani R, Dolenga M et al (1995) Chloral hydrate sedation of children undergoing CT and MR imaging: safety as judged by American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. AJR 165:905–909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanborn PA, Michna E, Zurakowski D et al (2005) Adverse cardiovascular and respiratory events during sedation of pediatric patients for imaging examinations. Radiology 237:288–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Egelhoff JC, Ball WS Jr, Koch BL et al (1997) Safety and efficacy of sedation in children using a structured sedation program. AJR 168:1259–1262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg SB, Faerber EN, Aspinall CL et al (1993) High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. AJR 161:639–641

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs and Committee on Environmental Health (1993) American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs and Committee on Environmental Health: Use of chloral hydrate for sedation in children. Pediatrics 92:471–473

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haselkorn T, Whittemore AS, Udaltsova N et al (2006) Short-term chloral hydrate administration and cancer in humans. Drug Safety 29:67–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sury M, Bullock I, Rabar S et al (2010) Sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in children and young people: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 341:c6819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dearlove O, Corcoran JP (2007) Sedation of children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Anaesth 98:548–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fogel MA, Weinberg PM, Parave E et al (2008) Deep sedation for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with cardiac anesthesia. J Pediatr 152:534–539, e531

    Google Scholar 

  12. Low E, O’Driscoll M, MacEneaney P et al (2008) Sedation with oral chloral hydrate in children undergoing MRI scanning. Ir Med J 101:80–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Eldevik OP et al (2000) Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes. Br J Anaesth 84:743–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Prochaska G et al (2000) Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics 105:E42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ong HT, Lim KJ, Low PC et al (2004) Simple instructions for partial sleep deprivation prior to pediatric EEG reduces the need for sedation. Clin Neurophysiol 115:951–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shields CH, Johnson S, Knoll J et al (2004) Sleep deprivation for pediatric sedated procedures: not worth the effort. Pediatrics 113:1204–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sury MR, Hatch DJ, Deeley T et al (1999) Development of a nurse-led sedation service for paediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 353:1667–1671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the role of the radiology nurses who are principally responsible for the success of sedation in our department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Bracken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bracken, J., Heaslip, I. & Ryan, S. Chloral hydrate sedation in radiology: retrospective audit of reduced dose. Pediatr Radiol 42, 349–354 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2279-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2279-9

Keywords

Navigation