Skip to main content
Log in

Fetal genitourinary imaging

  • Advances in Fetal and Neonatal Imaging
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fetal urinary tract is routinely evaluated sonographically beginning in the first trimester with documentation of fetal bladder visualization. Fetal MR might be indicated to further clarify abnormalities found sonographically. The primary imaging modality for evaluation of the fetal kidney is US, which plays an important role in the detection of collecting system dilatation and parenchymal diseases that influence counseling and postnatal care. A commonly seen birth defect affecting the fetal kidney is pyelectasis. The significance of this finding has been extensively evaluated by a number of fetal imaging centers and will be presented in this review. Further topics of interest within the fetal genitourinary system include fetal renal parenchymal disorders and fetal bladder abnormalities. Characteristic imaging features, as well as developmental pathology and differential considerations, are discussed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herndon CDA, McKenna PH, Kolon TF et al (1999) A multicenter outcomes analysis of patients with neonatal reflux presenting with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 162:1203–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Persutte WH, Koyle M, Lenke RR et al (1997) Mild pyelectasis ascertained with prenatal ultrasonography is pediatrically significant. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10:12–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kent A, Cox D, Downey P et al (2000) A study of mild fetal pyelectasia: outcome and proposed strategy of management. Prenat Diagn 20:206–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sairam S, Al-Habib A, Sasson S et al (2001) Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid-trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ismaili K, Hall M, Donner C et al (2003) Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:242–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Odibo AO, Raab E, Elovitz M et al (2004) Prenatal mild pyelectasis evaluating the thresholds of renal pelvic diameter associated with normal postnatal renal function. J Ultrasound Med 23:513–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD et al (2006) Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 118:586–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koff SA (1987) Problematic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 138:390–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lebowitz RL, Olbing H, Parkkulainen KV et al (1985) International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Radiol 15:105–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maizels M, Reisman ME, Flom LS et al (1992) Grading nephroureteral dilatation detected in the first year of life: correlation with obstruction. J Urol 148:609–614, discussion 615–616

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blane CE, DiPietro MA, Zerin JM et al (1993) Renal sonography is not a reliable screening examination for vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 150:752–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tibballs JM, DeBruyn R (1996) Primary vesicoureteral reflux: how useful is postnatal ultrasound? Arch Dis Child 75:444–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aksu N, Yavascan O, Kangin M et al (2005) Postnatal management of infants with antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1253–1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mallik M, Watson AR (2008) Antenatally detected urinary tract abnormalities: more detection but less action. Pediatr Nephrol 23:897–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Benacerraf BR, Mandell J, Estroff J (1990) Fetal pyelectasis: a possible association with Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 76:58–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nyberg DA, Resta RG, Luthy DA et al (2001) Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 20:1053–1063

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bromley B, Lieberman E, Shipp TD et al (2002) The genetic sonogram: a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second trimester. J Ultrasound Med 21:1087–1096

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007) Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG practice bulletin; no. 77)

  20. Flashner SC, King LR (1976) Ureteropelvic junction. In: Clinical pediatric urology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, p 693

  21. Association AU (2010) Screening of the neonate/infant with prenatal hydronephrosis. American Urological Association Education and Research Inc., Bulletin Topic, 5

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ebel KD (1998) Uroradiology in the fetus and newborn: diagnosis and follow-up of congenital obstruction of the urinary tract. Pediatr Radiol 28:630–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Reilly P, Aurell M, Britton K et al (1996) Consensus on diuresis renography for investigating the dilated upper urinary tract. Radionuclides in Nephrourology Group. Consensus Committee on Diuresis Renography. J Nucl Med 37:1872–1876

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cullen-McEwen LA, Caruana G, Bertram JF (2005) The where, what and why of the developing renal stroma. Nephron Exp Nephrol 99:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenblum ND (2008) Developmental biology of the human kidney. Seminar Fetal Neonatal Med 13:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodriguez MM (2004) Developmental renal pathology: its past, present, and future. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 23:211–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ingraham SE, Saha M, Carpenter AR et al (2010) Pathogenesis of renal injury in the megabladder mouse: a genetic model of congenital obstructive nephropathy. Pediatr Res 68:500–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Zhou Y, Tan R et al (2010) Mice lacking the matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene reduce renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 299:973–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aslam M, Watson AR (2006) Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: long term outcomes. Arch Dis Child 91:820–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergmann C, Senderek J, Kupper F et al (2004) PKHD1 mutations in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). Hum Mutat 23:453–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bergmann C, Senderek J, Windelen E et al (2005) Clinical consequences of PKHD1 mutations in 164 patients with autosomal-recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). Kidney Int 67:829–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson PD (2004) Polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 350:151–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reuss A, Wladimiroff JW, Stewart PA et al (1990) Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound in pregnancies at risk for autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:355–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu YP, Cheng SJ, Shih SL et al (2006) Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: appearance on fetal MRI. Pediatr Radiol 36:169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mashiach R, Davidovits M, Eisenstein B et al (2005) Fetal hyperechogenic kidney with normal amniotic fluid volume: a diagnostic dilemma. Prenat Diagn 25:553–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsatsaris V, Gagnadoux MF, Aubry MC et al (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral isolated fetal hyperechogenic kidneys. Is it possible to predict long term outcome? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109:1388–1393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Woolf A (2008) Perspectives on human perinatal renal disease. Seminar Fetal Neonat Med 13:196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Decramer S, Parant O, Beaufils S et al (2007) Anomalies of the TCF2 gene are the main cause of fetal bilateral hyperechogenic kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:923–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sebire N, Kaisenberg CV, Rubio C et al (1996) Fetal megacystis at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 8:387–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bronshtein M, Kushnir O, Ben-Rafael Z et al (1990) Transvaginal sonographic measurement of fetal kidneys in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 18:299–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosati P, Guariglia L (1996) Transvaginal sonographic assessment of the fetal urinary tract in early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sepulveda W (2004) Megacystis in the first trimester. Prenatal Diagn 24:144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yiee J, Wilcox D (2008) Abnormalities of the fetal bladder. Semin Fetal Neonat Med 13:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The supplement this article is part of is not sponsored by the industry. Dr. Chapman has no financial interest, investigational or off-label uses to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Chapman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, T. Fetal genitourinary imaging. Pediatr Radiol 42 (Suppl 1), 115–123 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2172-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2172-6

Keywords

Navigation